- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wilson vs White hits side by side (We should NOT let up on this!)
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:08 pm to Buckshot24
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:08 pm to Buckshot24
quote:
His hit was not called targeting.
Wilson’s hits are never called targeting. See A&M game where he launched and lead with crown right to the head of the A&M returner. “Birmingham, aka, Tuscaloosa East, made up a similar excuse.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:17 pm to Macavity92
Yes it could have been called. Both could have been called and at worst should have been a 15 yard penalty or not called at all. They either need to do away with this ejection shite or only enforce it on serious, malicious cases. It's complete bull shite.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:31 pm to bigosports
quote:
Wilson hit him in the chest not the neck or head area
Moment of impact of both. Wilson leads with crown of helmet straight to neck area. White leads with hands to chest.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:31 pm to Macavity92
Let's also make it clear that any contact to the head and neck is targeting.
Got it?
Got it?
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:36 pm to LSUStar
quote:
Let's also make it clear that any contact to the head and neck is targeting.
Forcible contact
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:37 pm to LSUStar
quote:
Let's also make it clear that any contact to the head and neck is targeting.
Got it?
No, got damn it, it is not!
Read the rule!
First, it requires "forcible contact."
Second, it has to have one of the indicators of targeting! They are:
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
LINK
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:55 pm to RJL2
The rule allows for the booth ref to review all hits for targeting.
The Miami player thrown out in the first game and Battle being thrown out in the Auburn game came on plays not flagged by the on-field ref.
GEAUX TIGERS
The Miami player thrown out in the first game and Battle being thrown out in the Auburn game came on plays not flagged by the on-field ref.
GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:02 pm to Thorny
That A&M play should be put side by side with white’s hit and the Tennessee hit with the caption: “Only one of these received a flag. Can you guess which one?”
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:42 pm to JonTheTigerFan
Right. Wilson targeted without question. If the targeting rule is designed to protect players it is not working because the UT QB was injured, but the MSU QB was NOT. So there's that for the officious pedants on the rant. If Wilson was not targeting and White was under the current rule then the rule is nonsense and more than likely designed to allow games to be manipulated.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:43 pm to Macavity92
See my recent response. Geezus.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:51 pm to Lsuchampnj
Everybody debating this, to determine if the SEC is biased, and dirty. Should have figured this out after the bridge schedule, fiasco. They will do anything to assist Alabama, as if they really need any help.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:05 pm to Rougarou13
Updated the OP with the videos of both
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:23 pm to Lsuchampnj
You need to add the Auburn Targeting that was overturned.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:10 pm to Lsuchampnj
Maybe add the Bama Targeting on the aTm kick returner from this year. Also that was a no call.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 9:12 pm to Born to be a Tiger1
We should collect all of the best images and videos that prove the cause... I sense the momentum is building and the more examples we have the stronger the case...if we can buy billboards , we can buy ad spots on local media with these images as the proof. We comin’
Posted on 10/23/18 at 8:00 am to Lsuchampnj
Man the more I watch those hits the more pissed I get. Wilson dude launches helmet down and leading with helmet and white has his hands out and helmet is straight up. frick the refs and the sec offices
Popular
Back to top

0










