- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Baker’s Defense finally be able to stop a mobile QB?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:41 pm to hg
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:41 pm to hg
quote:
John Chavis
While Chavis DID stop Johnny Football with that solid zone read and react scheme, he did struggle against mobile QBs.
If you need a refresher, just watch the 2001 SECCG when a little known player named Matt Mauk came into the game after a cheap shot took out Davey. Watch how Matt was able to quickly stabilize that UT Defense with the same play over and over and over
ETA: Also, Chavis' scheme against JF was ultimately used by NFL teams to get him out of the league pretty quickly.
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 5:24 pm to misey94
Baker hasn’t really impressed as DC but he has improved the defense every year. This year he’s has the most talent & depth throughout the center field so we should see an improved defense across all metrics.
He does give me 3rd and Chavis vibes though. What’s really weird is in some games he makes very good 2nd half adjustments and other games he seems to get hyper conservative. For example, he will run stunts or twists with delayed blitz and then go hyper conservative.
I’ve been very disappointed with his development & cohesiveness of the front 7. I also don’t really feel confident we will see a Q4 stop in the big gamewhen we need it from him.That’s just my opinion.
He does give me 3rd and Chavis vibes though. What’s really weird is in some games he makes very good 2nd half adjustments and other games he seems to get hyper conservative. For example, he will run stunts or twists with delayed blitz and then go hyper conservative.
I’ve been very disappointed with his development & cohesiveness of the front 7. I also don’t really feel confident we will see a Q4 stop in the big gamewhen we need it from him.That’s just my opinion.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:43 pm to Scoob
quote:
Ole Miss went 3 and out on their 1st two possessions, LSU had a TD drive and was up 7-0.
Ole Miss' 3rd possession was 18 plays for 83 yds, we did finally hold to a FG.
Ok. So 3 drives and lsu gave up a field goal to lane kiffin, Trinidad chambliss and company. Thats doing their freaking job.
Vandy.. who all did we even have playing against vandy?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 12:22 am to Ebridg3
quote:I pulled up the page on espn, and looked at defensive stats. Outside of missing Whit Weeks, it looked like the guys we saw playing all year. Including, you know, a few guys who got drafted; Delane, Haulsey, Perkins.
Vandy.. who all did we even have playing against vandy?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:32 am to trussthetruzz
quote:
What DC doesn't struggle against a mobile quarterback?
Chavis and Aranda. Manziel and Jackson were both shut down.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:34 am to foghat
Every team struggles against mobile QBs. Shoot, look at what Plumlee did to us in 2019 
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:01 pm to Doby
quote:
I’ve been very disappointed with his development & cohesiveness of the front 7. I also don’t really feel confident we will see a Q4 stop in the big gamewhen we need it from him.That’s just my opinion.
It’s very, very simple. It comes down to overall talent, which the defense had fairly little of after the utter collapse in 23. Guys like Swinson, Weeks (when healthy), Delane, Alexander, Woodland, and Halsey have all thrived in his system, but they all have legit SEC talent.
Now look at the REST of the defense the last 3 seasons. Look up front the last 2 years- a whole lot of good to average inside 2 years ago and across the front 4 last year. 0 difference makers up front. Look at Safety and Penn at LB 2 years ago- not even close to SEC level. The CBs other than Zy 2 years ago- freshmen or not good enough.
We’ve been getting by on a lot of very average to frankly below average players by top SEC standards on defense, bolstered by a few very good ones and a decent scheme. But top offenses in this conference overcome scheme. You must have the talent to win on that side of the ball. This is by far the highest overall talent level we’ve had on defense since Baker got here, but even now we still have thin spots at DB and DE due to injuries.
If you want to knock the overall defensive recruiting, that’s valid. Now it’s improved dramatically over the last two years in both HS and the portal, but let’s be honest- that’s more about getting the money situation right than Baker or his staff in today’s world.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:11 pm to IM_4_LSU
quote:
And for everyone saying "Whit was hurt" as a reason why we struggled. Then you have forgotten Whit led the SEC in tackles in '24 and we still struggled with stopping a running QB. Go back and look at the South Carolina game in '24 if Sellers doesn't get hurt we likely lose that game. He gashed us on runs including at 75 yd td run. Bama embarrassed us running the QB lmfao.
Yeah, having slow as hell Penn in the middle, Perkins looking absolutely lost most of the time (before getting hurt), and playing 2 of the worst Safeties in the SEC really helped us defending mobile QBs in 24.
If this is who you are relying on to make the right reads and get guys on the ground, then there’s a ceiling on what any DC can accomplish. Thankfully the talent situation is better now, so the results need to follow.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:18 pm to mhc4tigers
quote:
Other than Perkins freshman year we have not been able to pressure the QB against good team for at least five years
We actually did a better job pressuring the QB last year. The major issue was getting mobile QBs on the ground. We had a bunch of solid guys who played their roles, but we didn’t have guys who could finish off those plays in the backfield.
Reliford showed flashes before he got hurt, but we don’t know what he would have looked like vs a better offense, because it turned out that Clemson sucked.
I definitely agree with you about overall talent level. It REALLY bottomed out in 23 and it’s been a long climb to get back to some level of stability.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:23 pm to misey94
quote:
Yeah, having slow as hell Penn in the middle, Perkins looking absolutely lost most of the time (before getting hurt), and playing 2 of the worst Safeties in the SEC really helped us defending mobile QBs in 24.
If this is who you are relying on to make the right reads and get guys on the ground, then there’s a ceiling on what any DC can accomplish. Thankfully the talent situation is better now, so the results need to follow.
LMFAO so a DC having issues with mobile QBs before he was our DC and during and its the players fault not his.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:22 pm to IM_4_LSU
Baker, so far, seems to be a 1 scheme guy. Man coverage and heavy pass rush. Upfield pressure.
I haven't seen him adjust to try to contain if someone beats the pressure.
I haven't seen him adjust to try to contain if someone beats the pressure.
Popular
Back to top


0





