Started By
Message

re: Will Baker’s Defense finally be able to stop a mobile QB?

Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:41 pm to
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
4765 posts
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

John Chavis


While Chavis DID stop Johnny Football with that solid zone read and react scheme, he did struggle against mobile QBs.

If you need a refresher, just watch the 2001 SECCG when a little known player named Matt Mauk came into the game after a cheap shot took out Davey. Watch how Matt was able to quickly stabilize that UT Defense with the same play over and over and over

ETA: Also, Chavis' scheme against JF was ultimately used by NFL teams to get him out of the league pretty quickly.
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Doby
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2014
2140 posts
Posted on 8/10/26 at 5:24 pm to
Baker hasn’t really impressed as DC but he has improved the defense every year. This year he’s has the most talent & depth throughout the center field so we should see an improved defense across all metrics.

He does give me 3rd and Chavis vibes though. What’s really weird is in some games he makes very good 2nd half adjustments and other games he seems to get hyper conservative. For example, he will run stunts or twists with delayed blitz and then go hyper conservative.

I’ve been very disappointed with his development & cohesiveness of the front 7. I also don’t really feel confident we will see a Q4 stop in the big gamewhen we need it from him.That’s just my opinion.
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
3168 posts
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

Ole Miss went 3 and out on their 1st two possessions, LSU had a TD drive and was up 7-0.
Ole Miss' 3rd possession was 18 plays for 83 yds, we did finally hold to a FG.


Ok. So 3 drives and lsu gave up a field goal to lane kiffin, Trinidad chambliss and company. Thats doing their freaking job.

Vandy.. who all did we even have playing against vandy?
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
14680 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 12:13 am to
No Whit, Butler, or Gooden
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23909 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 12:22 am to
quote:

Vandy.. who all did we even have playing against vandy?

I pulled up the page on espn, and looked at defensive stats. Outside of missing Whit Weeks, it looked like the guys we saw playing all year. Including, you know, a few guys who got drafted; Delane, Haulsey, Perkins.




Posted by foghat
Dallas
Member since Sep 2006
1115 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:32 am to
quote:

What DC doesn't struggle against a mobile quarterback?


Chavis and Aranda. Manziel and Jackson were both shut down.
Posted by AkronTiger
2025 NFL Survivor Champion
Member since May 2021
3172 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:34 am to
Every team struggles against mobile QBs. Shoot, look at what Plumlee did to us in 2019
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
36324 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I’ve been very disappointed with his development & cohesiveness of the front 7. I also don’t really feel confident we will see a Q4 stop in the big gamewhen we need it from him.That’s just my opinion.


It’s very, very simple. It comes down to overall talent, which the defense had fairly little of after the utter collapse in 23. Guys like Swinson, Weeks (when healthy), Delane, Alexander, Woodland, and Halsey have all thrived in his system, but they all have legit SEC talent.

Now look at the REST of the defense the last 3 seasons. Look up front the last 2 years- a whole lot of good to average inside 2 years ago and across the front 4 last year. 0 difference makers up front. Look at Safety and Penn at LB 2 years ago- not even close to SEC level. The CBs other than Zy 2 years ago- freshmen or not good enough.

We’ve been getting by on a lot of very average to frankly below average players by top SEC standards on defense, bolstered by a few very good ones and a decent scheme. But top offenses in this conference overcome scheme. You must have the talent to win on that side of the ball. This is by far the highest overall talent level we’ve had on defense since Baker got here, but even now we still have thin spots at DB and DE due to injuries.

If you want to knock the overall defensive recruiting, that’s valid. Now it’s improved dramatically over the last two years in both HS and the portal, but let’s be honest- that’s more about getting the money situation right than Baker or his staff in today’s world.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 1:03 pm
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
36324 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

And for everyone saying "Whit was hurt" as a reason why we struggled. Then you have forgotten Whit led the SEC in tackles in '24 and we still struggled with stopping a running QB. Go back and look at the South Carolina game in '24 if Sellers doesn't get hurt we likely lose that game. He gashed us on runs including at 75 yd td run. Bama embarrassed us running the QB lmfao.


Yeah, having slow as hell Penn in the middle, Perkins looking absolutely lost most of the time (before getting hurt), and playing 2 of the worst Safeties in the SEC really helped us defending mobile QBs in 24.

If this is who you are relying on to make the right reads and get guys on the ground, then there’s a ceiling on what any DC can accomplish. Thankfully the talent situation is better now, so the results need to follow.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
36324 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Other than Perkins freshman year we have not been able to pressure the QB against good team for at least five years


We actually did a better job pressuring the QB last year. The major issue was getting mobile QBs on the ground. We had a bunch of solid guys who played their roles, but we didn’t have guys who could finish off those plays in the backfield.

Reliford showed flashes before he got hurt, but we don’t know what he would have looked like vs a better offense, because it turned out that Clemson sucked.

I definitely agree with you about overall talent level. It REALLY bottomed out in 23 and it’s been a long climb to get back to some level of stability.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 1:23 pm
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
14086 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Yeah, having slow as hell Penn in the middle, Perkins looking absolutely lost most of the time (before getting hurt), and playing 2 of the worst Safeties in the SEC really helped us defending mobile QBs in 24.

If this is who you are relying on to make the right reads and get guys on the ground, then there’s a ceiling on what any DC can accomplish. Thankfully the talent situation is better now, so the results need to follow.


LMFAO so a DC having issues with mobile QBs before he was our DC and during and its the players fault not his.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23909 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:22 pm to
Baker, so far, seems to be a 1 scheme guy. Man coverage and heavy pass rush. Upfield pressure.
I haven't seen him adjust to try to contain if someone beats the pressure.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram