Started By
Message

re: Why not cap the amount an athlete can receive for their "likeness"

Posted on 10/2/19 at 10:44 am to
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

capping wages? sounds like some commie shite to me
I generally agree, but we need caps in certain areas - such as sport leagues.

The NBA and NFL have caps - to ensure that teams with more resources don't just outspend smaller market teams to get the best players. If that happens, the league isn't as competitive, interest from fans will decline, and the league will suffer.

Now out in the real world, I agree, no caps and let competition occur.

But sports leagues are a different beast.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12848 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 10:46 am to
Very odd OP.
why would anyone want to cap these revenues?
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:08 am to
quote:

why would anyone want to cap these revenues?
because without a cap, the schools with more booster money will pay more to the players. So the top players will go to those schools, and schools with less booster money won't get the good players. Kind of like it is now, but the money will make it even more pronounced.

You do realize that the NFL and NBA have salary caps for a reason, right.
Posted by StadiumDormRat'72
BR,LA
Member since Sep 2012
2942 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:36 am to
quote:

People scream bloody murder until they have their way and basically directly target anyone who disagrees and falsely labels them as some sort of tyrant.



i need to know what sort of tyrant you are before I can agree with you
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12848 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:47 am to
The NFL has no cap on what a player can get for his likeness.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

The NFL has no cap on what a player can get for his likeness.
true, but the cap is on what they can pay players, which is in place to prohibit high-dollar teams from simply outbidding lower dollar teams, in order to keep the league more competitive.

You know the boosters will find a way to pay players for their "likeness" and if there's no system in place (I'm not saying a hard cap is the right answer), it'll be a feeding frenzy for the top players with cash flying everywhere.

I don't think college football wants that.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Finally, your heartache about the "bloodsuckers from the NCAA that enjoy the profits" is way off base. The revenue doesn't go to this ambiguous NCAA company. The revenue goes to the LSU's of the world. You realize that, right? And, the revenue is pretty much completely put back into other athletic programs at these universities. That's how stadiums are paid for, womens sports and other non revenue athletics are funded, etc. And, with very few exceptions, universities take a loss when it comes to athletics. In other words, most of the time, there is no profit.
exactly right.

I think many people think there are a bunch of fat cats at the NCAA getting rich, buying mansions and yachts. That's not the way it works. The NCAA money gets distributed back to the universities. LINK
Posted by Barney Rubble
Hattiesburg MS
Member since Oct 2010
825 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

but feel like this will really peel back the curtain on shady recruiting and create a lot of controversy between athletes in profit generating teams vs athletes on teams operating at a loss.



I'm not sure I see the problem. If a car dealer in Monroe wants to pay their QB $20k for a car ad and some Twitter shout outs but LA Monroe is losing money and their football team is winless, $20k is still the market value of that player. And the money isn't coming from the tax payers, the athletic department or the school.
Posted by SlimChris1
Member since Apr 2018
62 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:30 pm to
Because this is America, and we live in a free market society. Life isn't fair. Some people will make millions a year, the rest of us will just write comments on Tiger Droppings.
Posted by Tiger_Style
The N.O.
Member since Apr 2019
808 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:38 pm to
This makes no sense at all. Is there a cap on how much money TAF can bring in?
Let the earners earn. Screw the NCAA and their BS sharecropper model.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Screw the NCAA and their BS sharecropper model.
hyperbole much?
Posted by Roymg
Covington
Member since Apr 2005
658 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:10 pm to
Wait a minute. Dont these football players that are on scholarships get a free education? If they succeed in getting agents, while in college and this results in receiving endorsements, then they need to pay to play. I've never like professional sports that much because they compete from their back pockets. In college it's always been from the heart, school, team, and state you lived in. I guess nothing last forever.
Posted by vl100butch
Ridgeland, MS
Member since Sep 2005
35976 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:16 pm to
I'm more concerned about the unintended consequences of paying for "likeness"

the things that no one is thinking about right now...
Posted by Ramsey Dardar 1982
Member since Apr 2019
893 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:50 pm to
My word. You are quite full of yourself, aren’t you. I hope that works out well for you.


GEAUX TIGERS!!!


Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12848 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:54 pm to
Such as...?
Posted by timm6971463
oakdale la
Member since Mar 2008
4385 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:01 pm to
!n the califonia law the cap would be illegal
Posted by timm6971463
oakdale la
Member since Mar 2008
4385 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:05 pm to
years of sweat , blood and hours of women chasing gone ,no their education is not free !
This post was edited on 10/2/19 at 2:07 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36970 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Because it's un-American.
Posted by coondaddy21
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
3222 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:10 pm to
I also feel like if this is something that’s inevitable, then players shouldn’t be able to benefit until after they are enrolled in college. It can’t be that the player goes to the highest bidder. I know a lot of that currently goes on but it will be bad for college football recruiting if it’s allowed before enrollment and during recruiting.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12848 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:24 pm to
Coondaddy, I think you misunderstand.
The right to sell one's likeness or goodwill isn't the same as selling one's services.
While there is a lot of confusion in this thread, the current debate is over whether a kid can sell his face or his endorsement or his autograph to the public or to firms that sell products or services.
Right now, the kid can not do this and remain an amateur. He has to enter into a modified indenture of servitude with a college for his football services and gets free tuition etc, in exchange.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram