Started By
Message
locked post

Why is Kelly so obsessed with shotgun formation, inside zone runs?

Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:12 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466271 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:12 am
I imagine at least 50% and probably closer to 65% of our runs are pure, simple, vanilla inside zone runs with very basic zone blocking.

Basically this:



The vast majority of the remainder of the run scheme is outside zone runs with basic, vanilla zone blocking.



The problem with this, other than the simplistic nature of the scheme (which makes it easy to scheme around), is we key exactly where we are going to run. Even if you switch from inside to outside, the gaps are still on the same side of the center. If you have no zone-option threat, then the DE on the weakside can always crash (this was a major issue against USCw late that I brought up constantly).


People on here criticize Nuss for not keeping it, but he doesn't have the option to do it. We're not running zone reads like we did with JD.

In 2022 I was highly critical of BK/Denbrock for constantly relying on this basic, vanilla bullshite run scheme. JD made it work b/c he was historically good, but it was clearly limited.

In 2023, JD became one of the best QBs in CFB history and he really made it work, BUT we also incorporated a lot of pistol looks to open things up. The non-QB rushing was still mostly based around Jayden magic, but we had a few wrinkles.

From the pistol, you can run like a traditional run scheme and not tip your running side, where you can incorporate man blocking, different types of zone blocking, counters, pulls, etc. Just an overall more complex and efficient running game.

Why is Kelly so stubborn about this "inside zone or death" running philosophy? This is clearly not a Denbrock or Sloan issue exclusively, as we are running BK's offense.

Also, it's clear Brad Davis has issues coaching this zone blocking scheme. Great recruiter but his coaching is kind of being exposed. This is 3 years in row of weak zone blocking by our OL. It was just hidden somewhat for 2 because of how amazing Jayden is. You put in a less efficient/skilled QB and it crumbles entirely (and that's not fully on Nuss).
Posted by alschroed
Member since Jul 2020
491 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:19 am to
Nuss should take more hikes under the center. It gives the RBs a running start and you can run play action. Nuss in the shotgun all the time doesn't work because Nuss can't run so the defensive team will Never go for the fake
in shotgun.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24144 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:21 am to
I’d kill for some Les Miles Toss Dives for 5 yards.
Posted by BearCrocs
Member since Aug 2013
8228 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:23 am to
The run option is stupid right now
Posted by FizzyPop
350 posts
Member since Jun 2024
794 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Nuss for not keeping it, but he doesn't have the option to do it.


I disagree. There are plenty of these where he rides the mesh point, so if all hell comes crashing down then he has the option to tuck and hit the edge. His simply chooses not to which makes us very predictable and our RBs get blown up in the teeth of the D.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
5971 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:24 am to
1) we run more than just IZ.

2) we seemed to be effective with it in 2019. It’s not a play call issue, it’s a we get no push and don’t get to the 2nd level issue.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20998 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Also, it's clear Brad Davis has issues coaching this zone blocking scheme. Great recruiter but his coaching is kind of being exposed. This is 3 years in row of weak zone blocking by our OL. It was just hidden somewhat for 2 because of how amazing Jayden is. You put in a less efficient/skilled QB and it crumbles entirely (and that's not fully on Nuss).


Serious questions need to be asked of him. Like you said beside Jayden being one of the best running QBs in SEC history we haven’t been able to establish any type of run with a RB for 3 seasons now
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24144 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:25 am to
In 2019 we had a qb who wasn’t afraid to keep it and run. We also had 3 all world receivers and a running back that has 2 Super Bowl rings.
Posted by JR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2005
1364 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:27 am to
You have dual OC's, one is a QB coach, the other is a WR coach. No input from OL coach to the offensive scheme.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
5971 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:27 am to
Still doesn’t address the problem our run game has now. It’s not a play call issue. Its a we get no push issue.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466271 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Nuss should take more hikes under the center. It gives the RBs a running start and you can run play action. Nuss in the shotgun all the time doesn't work because Nuss can't run so the defensive team will Never go for the fake

Yeah we should incorporate more formations under center.

Not I-form or anything (we don't need to go back to the Miles era), but 11 or 12 personnel.

Even if they refuse to go under center, like my OP says, we can use the pistol.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24144 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:28 am to
It makes a huge difference when a QB is willing to keep the ball every so often.


Also we don’t run RPO.

I can’t recall a single time Nuss has pulled the ball for a quick pass.
This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 8:50 am
Posted by JR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2005
1364 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:28 am to
You have dual OC's, one is a QB coach, the other is a WR coach. No input from OL coach to the offensive scheme.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8775 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:28 am to
Thanks for the diagrams and thorough explanation.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466271 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:29 am to
quote:

we seemed to be effective with it in 2019.

Well we had Chase, Jets, Marshall, and Burrow

Also, our run game in 2019 wasn't that great.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
5971 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:30 am to
We run a lot of RPO’s.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
5971 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Also, our run game in 2019 wasn't that great.



Clyde ran for 1,400 yards in 19
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466271 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Clyde ran for 1,400 yards in 19

We played a lot of games and he had 2 monster games.

Again, Chase, Jets, Marshall, and Burrow open up a lot of lanes.

When we started spamming the hurry up, CEH got a lot more efficient running the ball. His first 7 games, he only had 2, 100 yard games (and each occurred because of one long run).

Posted by FizzyPop
350 posts
Member since Jun 2024
794 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Also we don’t run RPO.



Exactly. A true RPO was Burrow eye's on safety looking at Jets running his choice slot route while meshing with Clyde. What LSU is doing this year is more of a RO without the P for 95% of those plays.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466271 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:36 am to
quote:

What LSU is doing this year is more of a RO without the P for 95% of those plays.

That's just a zone-read
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram