Why Durham not in on winning TD

It felt like coaching malpractice in the moment

The Zavion Thomas motion was key

You had 4 FOUR gamecock second level defenders all flat footed watching the Thomas motion, with the play side LB even taking a false step toward the motion.

This allowed enough time for Dellinger to climb to the second level and get a hat on that defender

LSU scored on the play even with Campbell whiffing on his 1v1 block

quote:

---

Why Durham not in on winning TD

---

We would have won so much harder if he had scored...or maybe defense would have keyed to the run with our most productive runner in the game. Or maybe we practiced the play for weeks without Durham in the lineup.

You have the back in that you know will not fumble. It's that simple.

quote:

---

LSU scored on the play even with Campbell whiffing on his 1v1 block

---

Campbell didn’t whiff. The end made an outside move and Campbell let him bc the play was designed to go off his inside shoulder. Campbell has been far from perfect this year, but that wasn’t a mistake.

The had the RB they trust the most in that situation. Durham will earn that over time

Whiff? No

Sustained block? No

Just enough? Yes

But the key was Thomas’ motion to make the second level defenders hesitate, and you see Delly climbing up to get the LB that took the false step due to the motion.

And Edmonds is a two-time transfer that was a backup at Carolina and FSU and now a backup again at Carolina. Need better from Campbell.

They were starting to focus on him and stack the box with him in… with Williams in they backed off expecting pass?

Chester and Dellinger mauled their assignment. And Campbell did fine until he was held, he gained leverage and stood the DE up, it was over at that point, all he had to do was not let the DE inside

Of all the calls in the game to question......... This was a great one vs man coverage. Williams pressed the line and hit the opening with authority.