- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why didn't SEC make ruling effective for next season?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:13 pm
This is a Power vs common sense.
Sankey needs to go. If he is allowed to strong arm this what's next?
Sankey needs to go. If he is allowed to strong arm this what's next?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:14 pm to 756
Because lane kiffin is the devil.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:15 pm to 756
quote:
Why didn't SEC make ruling effective for next season?
The ruling was already in place for next season.
This statement is directly related to the exceptions that were made. It's why they are being sued.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:16 pm to 756
quote:
This is a Power vs common sense.
Sankey needs to go. If he is allowed to strong arm this what's next?
Because they were trying to address this situation in particular.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:16 pm to 756
That would have made the most sense. Just recognize the mistake this year and make it a rule effective 2027. I don't think anyone would have cared that much.
But I'm just a dumb person, so
But I'm just a dumb person, so
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:16 pm to moneyg
So why did Sankey not leave it as was?
It was a good no call situation
It was a good no call situation
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:23 pm to 756
Why didn't they rule that playing any ineligible player would have the same penalties?
Make OM have to not play Chambliss.
Make OM have to not play Chambliss.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:24 pm to 756
Lane Kiffin is starting to remind a lot of Trump. In the sense that anything and everything he does and says gets criticized no matter what it is.
Yoga man bad!
Yoga man bad!
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:28 pm to 756
quote:
So why did Sankey not leave it as was?
It was a good no call situation
It's a good question. He put the SEC directly in the line of fire for these lawsuits when even the NCAA wasn't willing to fight them...all while already accepting other TROs that allowed ineligible players to play.
The rumors I've heard are that they are intentionally trying to force the hand of Congress. I don't really think that holds water, myself.
Maybe this is part of a longer term objective of the SEC and Big 10 to separate from the NCAA and this is just a single move on the chess board.
But, it fails logical tests in a vacuum.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:35 pm to moneyg
quote:
The rumors I've heard are that they are intentionally trying to force the hand of Congress. I don't really think that holds water, myself.
This is what happened. The sec’s first statement on this mentioned the bill in congress.
Now, if we assume the ncaa and conferences aren’t acting nefariously, they should have issued a blanket waiver for these players and called it a day.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:45 pm to DBG
I don't think they are trying to force congress hands I think Sank ee is trying to sink the ship! he is on a power trip and the Presidents of Universities are drinking his kool aid
Popular
Back to top
7










