- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are y’all crying about Clemson “reporting” it?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:52 am to thunderbird1100
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:52 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
and Houston never told us
They’re under no obligation to tell us
We have to find out
We didn’t
That’s on us
0
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:52 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Houston didn't have any duty to us once we stole their player.
Houston received the notice from the Big 12 in December. Haulcy transferred out in Spring. They had him for months on their roster and didn't tell him that he had to sit out the first half of this season.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:52 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
They told Houston, and Houston never told us
It's not their responsibility to. It's LSU's.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:54 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
No, he was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct. He was ejected for fighting.
You're missing the entire point here, no where in the game documents did it say fighting. The NCAA had to come in after the fact and say oh it was fighting, he's suspended next game 1st half, which again they told to Houston and Houston didnt even bother to tell Haulcy despite him being there for months after that ruling happened.
You are misconstruing facts here.
This post was edited on 8/29/25 at 10:55 am
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:54 am to holdem Tiger
quote:
The bowl game suspension was automatic. It was an ejection which requires the next half suspension.
Haulcy was cited for something that does not require a next season suspension.
They were both ejected at the exact same time for the exact same reason.
The ref literally said:
"Number 2 (Haucly), Houston. That player is ejected. Unsportsmanlike conduct."
"Unsportsmanlike conduct, Number 5, BYU. That player is also ejected"
Clearly BYU got the message from the Big 12 he had to sit in the bowl game...because he did. Now, it's possible Houston did too and they didn't care because they weren't going to a bowl game. But the BYU player having to sit ABSOLUTELY created reasonable basis for LSU to at least inquire.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:56 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
That's just not correct. He was ejected for fighting which carries a suspension
Nobody will take you seriously if you can't even get basic fricking facts right.
He was ejected on unsportsmanlike.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:57 am to Jack Daniel
It's not the fact that they reported it, it's when they reported it. I can guarantee you they didn't just find out about it on Wednesday.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:57 am to Jack Daniel
I don't blame Clemson at all. If LSU found out the Klubnik or one of those DL should be ineligible and didn't bring it up? People here would lose their minds. You have to take any advantage you can get.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:57 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
Why are y’all crying about Clemson “reporting” it?
Because it's a bush league desperate attempt to hamstring us. They went on a fishing expedition with both our transfer safeties. They caught something with one. And the NCAA, in their infinite wisdom, did not deliberate for a second before issuing a "ruling."
Not for nothing, all off season the Clemson "media" and coaching staff have been breathlessly spewing nonsense about "bulletin board material" related to the Death Valley nickname... just to turn around and drop this 3 days before kickoff.
It is what it is... but that doesn't mean we can't call out petty gamesmanship from a program that is OOZING with insecurity.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:58 am to Jack Daniel
Piss the frick off with this crap
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:58 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
This is 100% on LSU, the staff and the compliance department
Of course it is.
They should be in constant communication with the NCAA about the eligibility of all players in all sports, much less the new players. Now, they may have done that and the NCAA fricked us. That is always possible.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 10:59 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
You're missing the entire point here, no where in the game documents did it say fighting.
In the Official Play-by-Play / Game Log:
The penalty can be described as:
“Unsportsmanlike Conduct – Fighting”
or simply: “Unsportsmanlike Conduct”
It depends on how the official scorer phrases the infraction and what is communicated by the officiating crew.
Haulcey was ejected from the game. That’s your first clue that his penalty was for unsportsmanlike conduct - fighting. Had he not been ejected from the game, it would be simply unsportsmanlike conduct.
This is all on LSU.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:01 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
You're missing the entire point here, no where in the game documents did it say fighting.
You're right. That's in the NCAA rulebook.
The player was flighting, flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct and ejected.
The player he was fighting sat out the first half of the next game he played after the ejection.
For Clemson to notice this and ask for clarification before LSU did shows the negligence on LSU.
You don't ask for clarifiction for things you know, you ask for things where there might be a question about and this is blatantly obvious. They needed clarification and clearance which is the exact job of the compliance department.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:01 am to Not Cooper
quote:
I mean BYU knew lol. It wouldn’t be extremely hard to piece together. The guy he fought with was suspended for the first half of the bowl game.
Yes, just like Houston, BYU was told by the Big 12. BYU then told the player he was sitting out.
Why did Houston never tell Haulcy?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:02 am to Guava Jelly
What LSU SHOULD do is appeal it, he'll play in the interim since it's not eligibility. As long as it takes for the NCAA to make rulings, he'll play the whole season before they actually make a ruling. Instead of that, just voluntarily hold him out of the first half of the Southeastern game. Problem solved.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:04 am to wadewilson
quote:
Nobody will take you seriously if you can't even get basic fricking facts right.
He was ejected on unsportsmanlike.
Same goes for you. Players don’t get ejected from games for taunting , ie Unsportsmanlike conduct. It’s simply a 15 yard penalty.
They do, however, get ejected for fighting, ie unsportsmanlike conduct. The fact that Haulcey was ejected tells everyone that he was ejected for unsportsmanlike conduct - fighting. The official scorer is not required to enter fighting. They are only required to enter unsportsmanlike conduct in the official game log.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:04 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
That's just not correct. He was ejected for fighting which carries a suspension.
Wrong. If you’re going to emphatically state something at least be accurate.
He was ejected for an unsportsmanlike penalty, which doesn’t carry additional suspension. The Big 12 upgraded it after the game and sent a letter to Houston’s coach, who then never told Haulcy and didn’t include it in the paperwork when he transferred.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:05 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
No, he was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct. He was ejected for fighting.
Still wrong.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:08 am to Tammany Tom
quote:
Same goes for you. Players don’t get ejected from games for taunting , ie Unsportsmanlike conduct. It’s simply a 15 yard penalty.
Uhh
Yes they do.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 11:10 am to thunderbird1100
There is no more incestuous group than college football coaches. They ALL know each other.
Some assistant at UH tipped Dabo off.
Some assistant at UH tipped Dabo off.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News