- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who/when decided that that play had to be overturned?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:08 pm to CDawson
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:08 pm to CDawson
quote:
They didn’t see it in real time or they would have immediately called it. They didn’t which means none of them immediately saw anything.
Right. So what triggered them to meet and decide to change it?
2
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:09 pm to patchesohoulihan_007
quote:
Also can we discuss why in todays sports with 1000 angles there are non reviewable calls. I understand the perspective of not wanting to stop for every little thing and undermining the referee/umpire.
Ahould be any time a run is scored. It’s asinine that it’s not. You wouldn’t be reviewing every single score.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:09 pm to lctiger
I’m not there, but on the broadcast you never see him call out…and he’s in the picture for a good while.
Commentator even mentions I don’t think it was called before commercial.
Commentator even mentions I don’t think it was called before commercial.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:10 pm to patchesohoulihan_007
quote:
I’m not there, but on the broadcast you never see him call out…and he’s in the picture for a good while.
He 100% signaled out immediately after the tag. Just saw it twice on replay.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:10 pm to TackySweater
When they realized LSU was too hot.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:12 pm to patchesohoulihan_007
quote:
Also can we discuss why in todays sports with 1000 angles there are non reviewable calls.
Every scoring play should be reviewable, especially in late innings.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:13 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I think south Carolina coach went to talk to the umps after the call...
I never saw the ump signal out, seems like he immediately starting walking toward the 3rd base ump. Could've happened immediately after he left the frame.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:14 pm to lostinbr
quote:
He 100% signaled out immediately after the tag. Just saw it twice on replay.
You watching a different broadcast than me, bc I rewatched after your post to make sure I didn’t miss it. His hands stayed at his side
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:17 pm to patchesohoulihan_007
I 100% saw the home plate ump signal out. He walked toward pitcher and made fist in front of his chest
Edit to say if view is from behind home plate you might not be able to see the fist
Edit to say if view is from behind home plate you might not be able to see the fist
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:18 pm to Adajax
quote:
Every scoring play should be reviewable, especially in late innings.
With the system the SEC utilizes (remote review) every scoring play in every sport with review capability should be reviewable and reviewed. And the “judgement call” is BS on this play. It’s not judgement. It’s an objective standard. Objectively, he was no on or in front of home plate before he received the ball. That would have been easily ascertained by a review.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:20 pm to ATCTx
What happens if the batter stays in the box and swings at the pitch?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:21 pm to TigerphanTigerman
quote:
What happens if the batter stays in the box and swings at the pitch?
Catcher enters concussion protocol.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:22 pm to patchesohoulihan_007
quote:
You watching a different broadcast than me, bc I rewatched after your post to make sure I didn’t miss it. His hands stayed at his side
Idk what to tell you man. They showed a replay at the beginning of the UK/Tenn game and he clearly signaled out as he walked toward the mound. Maybe you couldn’t see it during the live broadcast but they replayed the thing from 50 different angles afterwards.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:23 pm to TigerphanTigerman
Then it’s catchers interference. But since the batter stepped out of the box, Milazzo could play it as he did. They never talked about on the broadcast the batter and how his position impacts that call.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:23 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I think south Carolina coach went to talk to the umps after the call...
Probably offered to gratify the HPU postgame to get the win.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:24 pm to Wiseguy
quote:
With the system the SEC utilizes (remote review) every scoring play in every sport with review capability should be reviewable and reviewed. And the “judgement call” is BS on this play. It’s not judgement. It’s an objective standard. Objectively, he was no on or in front of home plate before he received the ball. That would have been easily ascertained by a review.
The purpose of the rule is to prevent the catcher from impeding the path to the plate, putting both the runner and himself in danger. In NO WAY did Neal impede the path to the plate. There should never be a “well maybe his toe was slightly to far forward.” He didn’t impede the path to the plate. If the runner wanted to attempt to slide into home, he could’ve tried. But he knew he was out, so there wasn’t a reason to.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:26 pm to Gee Grenouille
quote:
I never saw the ump signal out, seems like he immediately starting walking toward the 3rd base ump. Could've happened immediately after he left the frame.
Just to put this to bed:
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:29 pm to TackySweater
The South Carolina coach said he asked them to talk about it
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:31 pm to ATCTx
quote:
The main problem here is he did not step on the plate and the home ump obviously didn't see it, so I'm thinking a base ump called the conference and they decided to call it.
It's just a terrible judgment call in that situation. If you're going to call it, you better be damned sure he was on the plate.
thats my read as well, i think 1st base umps angle thought he had his foot even with and 1/4" in front of the plate so they went with that.
but that said, the whole thing was BS from start to finish
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 5:32 pm to keakar
quote:
putting on tin foil hat now - its like they were told to make sure game 3 was played so that everyone can make more TV money
.. it’s single-elimination
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News