Started By
Message

What percentage of the blame do you put on the players ability vs the coaching staff?

Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:33 am
Posted by OJsLifeCoach
NYC
Member since Aug 2023
1069 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:33 am
Our defense wasn't bad this year. They weren't even terrible.

It was a whole different level of ineptness. Never really seen anything like it.

We heard all year that these guys are young, inexperienced etc. etc.

Sure, that's true. But I don't see how ability can make up for even 50% of how bad that squad was this year.

Just curious to hear your take on what you thought the reason was beyond House being trash.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13338 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:37 am to
80% on coaches/20% players.

There are PLENTY of teams with equal or worse talent that had much better defenses.

Auburn, for example, has a pretty shitty roster after Harsin and was light years better than we were this season. I think they have comparable talent to us. IF we have their defense, we might have 1 loss.

Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53770 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:38 am to
Our players aren't explosive off the line, we can not run people down, and struggle with tackling.

Sage for example seems like he's a step slow to be elite. He's long, but isn't DBU material from what I see on TV

Perkins is elite but was not mentioned all game. How is that possible?

Its both players and coaching
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13338 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Our players aren't explosive off the line, we can not run people down, and struggle with tackling.

Sage for example seems like he's a step slow to be elite. He's long, but isn't DBU material from what I see on TV

Perkins is elite but was not mentioned all game. How is that possible?

Its both players and coaching



Well coached players/teams have decisiveness which makes them seem much faster. If we ran a bunch of 40s vs other teams, I don't think we'd be much slower, we are just lost out there and it takes away speed.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
5637 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:40 am to
2020 was statistically worse (although all sec opponents).

I’m in the very small minority but I don’t think it was that much of a scheme issue (which is where the DC/House really does their damage). He did coach LBers so you can fault him for that, although they had moments (Weeks).

I think the main issues are:
-awful (or nonexistent, DL) position coaching which leads to all kinds of problems in technique & fundamentals
-lack of depth & high end talent.

I’d put 40% on both of those and 20% on House. Flame away I don’t care. He didn’t forget how to coach defense and did well in 22 and @ Kentucky in the same role.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13338 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:42 am to
We had glaring schematic issues in several games that didn't get corrected, most notably Alabama. The entire world saw what we needed to do and BK admitted it after.

How the frick does that happen?

Posted by OJsLifeCoach
NYC
Member since Aug 2023
1069 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:45 am to
quote:

80% on coaches/20% players.

There are PLENTY of teams with equal or worse talent that had much better defenses.


This is how I feel. When Tulane can hold the same opponent to less points/yards, I don't see how you can say we just straight up don't have the guys to do the same.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17528 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:47 am to
It wasn't that the talent was young, because they never really got better. Also, players like Major Burns, he's as good as he's going to get. Now he can play a little bit better with better pieces around him, but if the defense doesn't get better, he's not going to get any better. All that to say, it's not all coaching, but at the same time, the defense had talent. I think that at times, House was stubborn and didn't let the defense play to what strengths they had.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30731 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:47 am to
quote:

This is how I feel. When Tulane can hold the same opponent to less points/yards, I don't see how you can say we just straight up don't have the guys to do the same.



We absolutely have better players than tulane. The scheming sucks. Do the coaches watch film?

We were down some corners, but teams all over play freshmen 2* and 3* players and they dont have records set against them every game.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14860 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:49 am to
All the D coaches are lucky BK didn’t fire everyone of them.

They should all be gone
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
5748 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:50 am to
Like 100% coaching..

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35938 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:51 am to
We suffered from a lack of talent, inexperience, poor fundamentals, and poof strategy. Poor talent evaluation, sickness and injuries also hurt.

There were a lot of issues and the blame should be spread around to every facet of the team.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68063 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:54 am to
quote:

The entire world saw what we needed to do and BK admitted it after.
It was unforgivable. How can a coach be so stupid?
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
8305 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:55 am to
I have never seen an LSU defense that is constantly out of position, receivers running with no one even close to them, linebackers who are this slow, doesn't dare use press coverage most of the time as this defense. Some of it is talent and depth but whose fault is that? This defense needs an overhauled staff, a new culture, and a new voice coaching them.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28259 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

80% on coaches/20% players.

There are PLENTY of teams with equal or worse talent that had much better defenses.


Exactly.

The personnel is why this defense wasn't great...or even really good. The abysmal coaching is why they weren't at least average. Which is ALL this team needed them to be with how good the offense was. This wasn't the most talented LSU defense ever. Far from it. But it had equal, if not more, talent than mid-tier major conf. defenses.

This wasn't a "bad" season by any means. But it will ALWAYS go down as a wasted opportunity.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:06 am to
80/20 players to coaching.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
10584 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:08 am to
90% coaches
The examples of dynamic coaches who turn around a program on a dime are legion

Same for coaches who quickly destroy programs.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11970 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Our players aren't explosive off the line


How do they make NFL rosters, yet they can't compete in the SEC.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11970 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:14 am to
quote:

All the D coaches are lucky BK didn’t fire everyone of them.



If Kelly's name was Orgeron, without such a contract, he would have already been fired.
Slick talking Carpertbagger.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53770 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Well coached players/teams have decisiveness which makes them seem much faster. If we ran a bunch of 40s vs other teams, I don't think we'd be much slower, we are just lost out there and it takes away speed.


We can not run people down on the edges...



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram