- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your ideal carry split percentage between Fournette and Guice?
Posted on 8/18/16 at 2:19 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Posted on 8/18/16 at 2:19 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
based on 40 rushes
Fournette 20
Guice 10
Harris/Rest 10
based on 45 rushes
Fournette 22
Guice 12
Harris/Rest 11
Fournette 20
Guice 10
Harris/Rest 10
based on 45 rushes
Fournette 22
Guice 12
Harris/Rest 11
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:18 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
I'm not sure LF is that much better.
Cute..
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:32 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
2015 we avg'd 42 rushes a game. With that said...
55% fournette - 23 carries
20% guice - 8 carries
15% harris - 6 carries
10% Williams - 4 carries
I would be perfectly happy to switch Guice and harris as well. harris needs to carry the ball more. He avg'd 3.4 a carry. Which is probably more like 5-6 ypc without sacks.
he COULD be a dynamic threat.
55% fournette - 23 carries
20% guice - 8 carries
15% harris - 6 carries
10% Williams - 4 carries
I would be perfectly happy to switch Guice and harris as well. harris needs to carry the ball more. He avg'd 3.4 a carry. Which is probably more like 5-6 ypc without sacks.
he COULD be a dynamic threat.
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:34 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
35% Fournette
15% Guice
50% Harris/Etling throwing the ball.
I want an Offense that's 50/50 Run-Pass. (An LSU Alum can dream, can't he?) Probably wont see this until Brennan-Dinkelmann are in here and firmly entrenched as the 1-2 QB's.
BTW, anybody on here at practice? What's the breakdown of First Team-Second Team reps between BH and DE?
15% Guice
50% Harris/Etling throwing the ball.
I want an Offense that's 50/50 Run-Pass. (An LSU Alum can dream, can't he?) Probably wont see this until Brennan-Dinkelmann are in here and firmly entrenched as the 1-2 QB's.
BTW, anybody on here at practice? What's the breakdown of First Team-Second Team reps between BH and DE?
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:37 pm to semjase
quote:
35% Fournette
15% Guice
50% Harris/Etling throwing the ball.
you don't know how percentages work, do you?
quote:
(An LSU Alum can dream, can't he?)
And why throw this in?
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:39 pm to SportTiger1
for comparison sake, last year...
505 rushs total
Fournette - 300 = 59%
Guice - 51 = 10%
Williams - 60 = 12%
Harris - 67 = 13%
Others - 6%
505 rushs total
Fournette - 300 = 59%
Guice - 51 = 10%
Williams - 60 = 12%
Harris - 67 = 13%
Others - 6%
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:45 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
LSU averaged right around 40 rushes a game in 2015. I think this season will be similar.
LF - 60% 22-25
DG -30% 12-15
Rest -10% 3-6
Why would you not feed this guy as much as he wants.
LF - 60% 22-25
DG -30% 12-15
Rest -10% 3-6
Why would you not feed this guy as much as he wants.
Posted on 8/18/16 at 5:51 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:I happen to agree with this, definitely has more wiggle. I'd like to see Guice in the slot in motion, almost every play, instead of a no carrying the ball fullback. Give mthrfkers something to think about.
Guice is nasty. I'm not sure LF is that much better.
Posted on 8/19/16 at 12:31 am to GeorgeTheGreek
Guice is as good as Chubb or any other RB in the conference but LF7 is a special back. I watched Hershel and Bo. Im not saying he's better than those 2, but he's closer than any I've seen. If he improves as much from his soph to junior year, as he did from freshmen to soph, there won't be a RB in college close to him
Posted on 8/19/16 at 3:56 am to LSU4ever2002
With a more dynamic offense and a few more passes the clock will stop more on both incompletions and long passes and every first down to mark the chains, where that does not happen with 2-3 rushing plays that does not get you a first down. Let's add Williams and one other back for late carry's in blowouts or Brossette who may get some meaningful carries because he is a sleeper who could be very good next year with Guice both carrying the load.
Therefore, more plays for us where we usually have 58-65 would put us at 70-75 plays so let's take the lower average of 72 plays per game.
More passing routes, but effective ones and using the TE and a few times the RB in the flat or the great ole wheel route will give us 28 passes per game in 2016 (8 to TE/RB and 20 to WR) where I hope we complete 63%. Note Harris threw 23 passes per game last year for only 54% completed (only 12 pass completions per game- Very poor).
Note: Washington St. QB had 54 passes per game for almost 70% completion percentage, so I want our 28-30 passes to be at about 64% which is a 10% improvement. Remember a few games last year (Like Eastern Michigan) where Harris was just flinging it down the field (Bombs), and a lack of touch on short passes? He will be better at those and better routes will be called for a much better comp %.
Now for the OP question-
From my 72 plays - 28 passing = 44 rushing attempts
LF- 22 carries per game
Guice- 13 cpg
Williams/Brossette/others- 9 cpg
Last year LF had 25 cpg (300 total carries in 12 games). Everyone thinks he will carry a bit less of the load as well I do, a lot due to a great Guice and to keep him fresh. That is only 3 less rushes per game, and if we are more dynamic in the play calling he will get 2-3 receptions per game in screens and wheel routes, etc... Overall, with better play calling he will get huge runs and have about 1750 yards in the regular season with less carry's per game than 2015 and 2,100-2,200 total yards in 3 more games all the way to the Natty (If they go that far)
LF- 55%
Guice- 30%
Rest- 15%

Therefore, more plays for us where we usually have 58-65 would put us at 70-75 plays so let's take the lower average of 72 plays per game.
More passing routes, but effective ones and using the TE and a few times the RB in the flat or the great ole wheel route will give us 28 passes per game in 2016 (8 to TE/RB and 20 to WR) where I hope we complete 63%. Note Harris threw 23 passes per game last year for only 54% completed (only 12 pass completions per game- Very poor).
Note: Washington St. QB had 54 passes per game for almost 70% completion percentage, so I want our 28-30 passes to be at about 64% which is a 10% improvement. Remember a few games last year (Like Eastern Michigan) where Harris was just flinging it down the field (Bombs), and a lack of touch on short passes? He will be better at those and better routes will be called for a much better comp %.
Now for the OP question-
From my 72 plays - 28 passing = 44 rushing attempts
LF- 22 carries per game
Guice- 13 cpg
Williams/Brossette/others- 9 cpg
Last year LF had 25 cpg (300 total carries in 12 games). Everyone thinks he will carry a bit less of the load as well I do, a lot due to a great Guice and to keep him fresh. That is only 3 less rushes per game, and if we are more dynamic in the play calling he will get 2-3 receptions per game in screens and wheel routes, etc... Overall, with better play calling he will get huge runs and have about 1750 yards in the regular season with less carry's per game than 2015 and 2,100-2,200 total yards in 3 more games all the way to the Natty (If they go that far)
LF- 55%
Guice- 30%
Rest- 15%
Posted on 8/19/16 at 6:26 am to geauxtigers33
quote:
I have a strong feeling Guice and Fournette will be in the same formation a lot
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:33 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Whatever gets us the win 
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:12 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Depending on score but overall I would say 60-30 and 10 for others
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:21 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
What is your ideal carry split percentage between Fournette and Guice?
I don't really care what the percentage is. It does not seem to be Miles' way of working, but it should depend solely on how effective each is in game conditions.
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:24 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
98/1/1
Jk. 60/30/10
Jk. 60/30/10
Back to top

0





