- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
USA Today rips Ole Miss
Posted on 7/31/26 at 7:45 am
Posted on 7/31/26 at 7:45 am
Posted on 7/31/26 at 7:50 am to The Blue Stuff
Not nearly critical enough of Ole Miss.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 7:55 am to The Blue Stuff
quote:
They’ve won every possible way since being stood up at the alter.
How so? In addition to the program architect they also lost his right hand man OC and basically the entire offensive staff.
They lost a player who had 9 sacks last season.
Sure they retained QB and RB so not a total loss but let’s not pretend Ole Miss won in every single way.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:02 am to turnpiketiger
Ole Miss is going to be tough this year strictly because of Chambliss and Lacy. I expect them to fall off after this season.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:04 am to turnpiketiger
quote:quote:
They’ve won every possible way since being stood up at the alter.
How so?
They give their reasons in the next lines.
quote:
In the court of public opinion, and the court of judge shopping.
By retaining the two most important players on the roster, and beating their tormentor for them in the process.
I may not agree with the "every possible way" phrase, but they do give their reasoning.
This post was edited on 7/31/26 at 8:05 am
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:08 am to The Blue Stuff
While he does criticize them for being hypocritical, this article is trying REALLY hard to make Ole Miss out to be having an awesome offseason.
The Pete Golding era is going to be hilarious once reality sets in.
Keeping those players just sets the expectations even higher and there’s no way they repeat that success without Kiffen and Weis Jr.
The Pete Golding era is going to be hilarious once reality sets in.
Keeping those players just sets the expectations even higher and there’s no way they repeat that success without Kiffen and Weis Jr.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:12 am to mdomingue
quote:
In the court of public opinion
bullshite.
Especially if LSU dominates Clemson, all this goes out the window.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:19 am to The Blue Stuff
Its not getting nearly enough recognition about how petty and hypocritical this whole thing is. However, in a few years we will see how this played out for them. There is going to be a drop off once Chambliss and Lacy leave. If they aren't able to field competitive rosters this could be a situation to look at as a reason why. Its a bad look but ignorance is bliss and that describes Keith Carter perfectly.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:32 am to SulphursFinest
quote:
Ole Miss is going to be tough this year strictly because of Chambliss and Lacy. I expect them to fall off after this season.
Golding is an above average defensive coordinator and John David Baker is a really solid, high scoring offensive coordinator.
It's going to come down to recruiting and roster management for Ole Miss. I think they'll definitely drop off from last year though.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:36 am to elprez00
quote:quote:bullshite.
In the court of public opinion
If you don't see that Ole Miss won the court of public opinion before this lawsuit, you are not paying attention. Should they have? I don't think so. Did they? Yes.
quote:
Especially if LSU dominates Clemson, all this goes out the window.
That's the future, and you're talking about public opinion about the quality of the football team, not LSU as an institution or Kiffin as a person.
It was already dying down before the Ole Miss pettiness, but it was still in favor of Ole Miss. The lawsuit may push it back to maore neutral.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:40 am to The Blue Stuff
Nothing says a spurned woman quite like getting so angry at her ex that she takes it out on the children.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:41 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
David Baker is a really solid, high scoring offensive coordinator.
Hes been an OC for 2 years (CO-OC at Ole Miss he didn't call plays). A solid hire is accurate but calling him a "High Scoring Offensive Coordinator" is not. ECU averaged just over 30 PPG that isn't "High Scoring." I agree its a solid hire but there is a lot of unknown when it comes to him as an OC. He was a hire of convienance because he was familiar with what they were running so it would be an easier transition for Chambliss and the offensive players. Lets not get crazy here.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:41 am to The Blue Stuff
quote:
And being saved by a lovable everyman Pete Golding, a coach who seemingly wins the day every time he opens his mouth.

Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:46 am to The Blue Stuff
He spelled "altar" wrong in the first sentence. Not a great start.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:50 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Sure they retained QB and RB so not a total loss
And no matter what Chambliss or Ole Miss says, he wanted to follow the man that made him one of the best QBs in the country and transfer to LSU. He is a great QB, but without Kiffin and Weis in his ear on every play, his production will be less than it was last year.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:53 am to SulphursFinest
quote:
Ole Miss is going to be tough this year strictly because of Chambliss and Lacy. I expect them to fall off after this season.
They also had a very, very solid defensive haul in the portal. That game is going to be a war.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:55 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
John David Baker is a really solid, high scoring offensive coordinator.
Go look at what ECU did against any team with a pulse last year. For example they put up 17 against NC state, 13 against BYU, and 19 against Tulane
Posted on 7/31/26 at 8:56 am to elprez00
Early morning toilet thoughts:
What would the mood of this place be if ole miss went 11-1, only losing to LSU (let’s say big, something like 44-10)??
I guess a large part of that would be how LSU fared as well, but it would be interesting to see
What would the mood of this place be if ole miss went 11-1, only losing to LSU (let’s say big, something like 44-10)??
I guess a large part of that would be how LSU fared as well, but it would be interesting to see
Posted on 7/31/26 at 9:01 am to IM_4_LSU
quote:
Hes been an OC for 2 years (CO-OC at Ole Miss he didn't call plays). A solid hire is accurate but calling him a "High Scoring Offensive Coordinator" is not. ECU averaged just over 30 PPG that isn't "High Scoring." I agree its a solid hire but there is a lot of unknown when it comes to him as an OC. He was a hire of convienance because he was familiar with what they were running so it would be an easier transition for Chambliss and the offensive players. Lets not get crazy here.
It's East Carolina, who had horrible talent on the offensive side of the ball and one of the worst offenses in college football when he took over. "High scoring" can be relative. He's going to score a lot of points at Ole Miss and get a bigger job eventually I think. The turnaround at ECU on offense was pretty damn impressive, considering those facts.
East Carolina Ranks (D1 opponents only) -
Pre-John David Baker
2023:
Scoring Offense - 127th
YPG - 130th
Post-John David Baker:
2024:
Scoring Offense - 34th
YPG - 26th
2025:
Scoring Offense - 24th
YPG - 19th
But frick Ole Miss!
This post was edited on 7/31/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 7/31/26 at 9:05 am to SulphursFinest
quote:
Ole Miss is going to be tough this year strictly because of Chambliss and Lacy
I’ve seen some arguments that Chambliss is about to be exposed as a system QB and the system moved to Baton Rouge.
Remains to be seen, obviously.
Popular
Back to top

7







