0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update: Lawyers Representing Wright & Harris Claim SEC’s Action Put NCAA in Contempt
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:10 pm to beauchristopher
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:10 pm to beauchristopher
quote:
Exactly how I feel. I don't get this for these particular guys.
It’s a watershed moment for sure. SEC and B1G making a bold move and brazenly breaking antitrust law.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:13 pm to Allthatfades
quote:
Just because the court order rules they can play doesn’t mean the SEC schools have to take them. If the SEC has agreed 16-0 that they aren’t taking them, the kids are free to go play via the court order at Tulane or some Mountain West school. Just won’t be in the SEC.
Well if they were told they couldn't be eligible for 5 or 5 then I sympathize more for them here. I still think an exception should have been made for these guys. Many would have transferred or stayed at bigger schools IMO.
Completely understanding of the ban moving forward after them.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:25 pm to Wabbit7
quote:
Let it be known that the OP changed the tweet embedded to a more solid source after the fact
And this matters because?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:39 pm to iPad
SEC looks like the kid that got mad and left game but not before taking his ball. You annouce 5 for 5. So players agree to play for team A .SEC dont like how thier own law is working out so they come up with new law. To me to late these kids did everything by the book to gain a year. Maybe next time you make new bill read it through before you pass it.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:42 pm to iPad
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:56 pm to iPad
SEC may be in contempt themselves by their own actions under Code of Civil Procedure Art. 224 section 10:
(10) Any other act or omission punishable by law as a contempt of court, or intended to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority, and which is not a direct contempt.
(10) Any other act or omission punishable by law as a contempt of court, or intended to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority, and which is not a direct contempt.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:32 pm to Allthatfades
quote:
If the SEC has agreed 16-0 that they aren’t taking them, the kids are free to go play via the court order at Tulane or some Mountain West school. Just won’t be in the SEC.
That’s not how this works. The player is harmed financially in this scenario. He’s not going to make LSU money at Tulane. But for the collusion of the SEC, he would play for LSU and get paid handsomely.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:35 pm to Wabbit7
quote:
Let it be known that the OP changed the tweet embedded to a more solid source after the fact
What??!!!?? How dare he!
Good thing you called him out!
That was a close one.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:37 pm to beauchristopher
Wrong my friend, if it’s federal court they can do anything they want bro.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News