- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UGA committed a backcourt violation on the game winner
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:31 pm to rkf4lsu
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:31 pm to rkf4lsu
quote:
Refs were horrible yet again. They were camped out in the lane all night. Unless they threw the rule out you can't stay in the lane longer than 3 seconds. There best player yante or whoever he is was making pancakes in the lane for everyone all night and they didn't call it.
Does anyone here know the rules of basketball? There’s no Defensive 3 seconds in College Basketball
1
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:32 pm to tigahlovah
quote:
Mick, if you and I could sit down with an ncaa official and view that tape with him, I would bet you a grand he would say I am right on this. Anyone that knows basketball rules knows this!!!!
Are you trolling are something?
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:34 pm to Golfer
quote:
The specific exceptions are described in Article 3 of Rule 9.9 and states during a JUMP BALL, THROW-IN, or WHILE ON DEFENSE, a player may legally jump from his/her frontcourt, secure control of the ball with both feet off the the floor, and then return to the floor with one or both feet in the back court.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:34 pm to tigahlovah
Yeah, that’s not a backcourt violation.
You are incorrect.
You are incorrect.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:35 pm to Fus0623
Not on defense, on offense!! Hes was in the lane just sitting there.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:35 pm to tigahlovah
The player can be in the air while catching the ball and crossing from the front to the back court but cannot straddle the mid court line the way the Uga player did. It was a back court violation that wasn’t called.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:37 pm to Madking
Wrong. You can straddle the line.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:37 pm to tigahlovah
quote:
Mick, if you and I could sit down with an ncaa official and view that tape with him, I would bet you a grand he would say I am right on this. Anyone that knows basketball rules knows this!!!!
I officiated HS basketball for 4 years. The backcourt rule is the same in the NCAA.
He caught the ball with one foot in the backcourt. He hasn’t established himself in the frontcourt. Both feet and the ball have to be in the frontcourt for there to be a backcourt violation.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:42 pm to Madking
Straight from the NCAA rule book. 9.12.9
ETA I meant 9.12.10
quote:
Art. 9. A defensive player shall be permitted to secure control of the ball while both feet are off the playing court and land with one or both feet in the backcourt? It makes no difference if the first foot down was in the front court or backcourt?
ETA I meant 9.12.10
quote:
Art. 10. After a jump ball or during a throw-in, the player in his front court, who makes the initial touch on the ball while both feet are off the playing court, may be the first to secure control of the ball and land with one or both feet in the backcourt? It makes no difference if the first foot down was in the front court or backcourt?
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:42 pm to Golfer
And even if both feet are established in front court, on throw ins you can jump in the air catch the ball and land with one or both feet in backcourt and no violation.
UGA player caught the ball with one foot in front court and one foot in backcourt- totally fine.
UGA player caught the ball with one foot in front court and one foot in backcourt- totally fine.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:46 pm to Golfer
Golfer, I will defer to your experience as an official. I guess I was wrong, and mick I'm glad I didn't bet you a grand.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:48 pm to tigahlovah
It’s definitely weird looking when it happens live.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:48 pm to tigahlovah
Backcourt violations are probably the most confusing violations for the average fan. They see something like this, or a guy get both feet across into the front court but dribble the ball in the backcourt then put a foot in the backcourt.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:50 pm to Golfer
quote:
He caught the ball with one foot in the backcourt. He hasn’t established himself in the frontcourt. Both feet and the ball have to be in the frontcourt for there to be a backcourt violation
If he had one foot in front court, and one in back court when he caught the ball he still had front court status.
From the position he caught it, if he would have brought the other foot in the back court, as well as the ball...he would have been back court.
If he would have had both feet in the front court, and for whatever reason, jumped in the air and caught the ball (with both feet off the ground), landing both feet in the back court after the catch..it would have been back court.
Thats what I believe the rule is. Would that be correct?
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:51 pm to Pintail
Looked like he caught the ball in the front court and continued to the backcourt. Looked like one foot was down at least. I said straddling but that was a bad way to describe it he was running toward the mid court had possession before crossing then crossed. That’s a back court violation.
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:52 pm to tigahlovah
quote:
Golfer, I will defer to your experience as an official. I guess I was wrong, and mick I'm glad I didn't bet you a grand
Back court rules can get pretty confusing for someone who doesnt really really get it.
You aren't as dumb as others are trying to make you sound. They probably didnt totally understand it either, but they just so happened to be correct in this case.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:55 pm to tigahlovah
wrong.
everything over - anything back.
that is the best way to think of a backcourt violation.
everything over - anything back.
that is the best way to think of a backcourt violation.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:55 pm to Madking
If only 1 foot was down then he was never established in the front court and therefore it’s impossible to have a backcourt violation.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 8:58 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
If he had one foot in front court, and one in back court when he caught the ball he still had front court status.
The ball hasn’t been touched by an offensive player in bounds in the front court. So he has no status in either front court of backcourt. He established backcourt when he first touched the ball with one foot in the backcourt. Therefore he can pull his other foot and the ball to the backcourt without violation.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:00 pm to Golfer
quote:
The ball hasn’t been touched by an offensive player in bounds in the front court. So he has no status in either front court of backcourt.
So ball has to be touched for a front court/back court status to be established?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News