Started By
Message

Tulane VS LSU

Posted on 5/3/19 at 11:58 pm
Posted by Nolawavefan
Member since Aug 2013
16 posts
Posted on 5/3/19 at 11:58 pm
There has been a debate going on on gotula.net in light of ur new AD.

Looking for Tiger fans thoughts on playing TU in the sports that matter, Fball, MBball and baseball.

Is there no interest? Would it have to 2-1 or only in LSU or the dome? Is it only older fans who witnessed the rivalry who care? Does it even matter because the LSU admin won’t play TU no matter what?

TU is finally investing in athletics and making changes when necessary. FBall seems to have turned the corner and though BBAll was a mess at least they did pay market rates for MD and then canned him and replaced him with a proven winner. Baseball is a WIP but not an RPI drain.

This is not meant to start a TU bashing thread, we deal with enough pain. Trying to get thoughtful opinions on this historic rivalry and how fans think about playing TU vs some of the other useless doormats on ur respective schedules.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 12:01 am
Posted by PrimetimeDaBoss
Swag City, USA
Member since Oct 2008
7144 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 12:08 am to
Sounds like a hullabaloo to me.
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13233 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 12:10 am to
What is a Tulane?
Posted by Enfuego
Uptown
Member since Mar 2009
9883 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 12:35 am to
The best academic university in Louisiana trying to become the clear 2nd best athletic university in Louisiana.
Posted by Nolawavefan
Member since Aug 2013
16 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 12:42 am to
Typical and expected. Hopefully some LSU fans can step up.
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
1488 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:21 am to
You'll get a lot of negative comments on the Rant but in private most LSU fans welcome the recent athletic changes at Tulane. Many that I talk to are hopeful but past disappointment prevent anyone from getting too excited.

The disadvantage of a private funding base can be offset with increased television revenue and a couple of well-placed bond issues. The historic advantages of recruiting to New Orleans (food, Mardi Gras, food, nightlife, food...) will solve a lot of problems. Like they said at Harry Cohn's funeral, give the people what they want and they will come.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13085 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:22 am to
1. We should play Tulane as follows:

2. In football, ONLY in Tiger Stadium and in a rotation with La Tech, ULM, and ULL.

3. In MBB, one year in the PMAC and one year in the NO Arena and never on their campus.

4. In baseball, never in Turchin but one year in Alex Box and the next in the Shrine on Airline with the tickets split.
Posted by TheBaker
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2004
4307 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:33 am to
I remember the LSU/Tulane rivalry when I was a kid in the 80’s. Tiger Stadium was always packed and the Dome was always packed. Tulane was competitive back then...beat LSU 48-7 in ‘81, 31-28 in ‘82 (Orange Bowl bound LSU), and lost to #5 ranked LSU 41-36 in ‘87 (LSU was Gator Bowl bound and Tulane went to the Independence Bowl). Tulane had legit D1 talent back then...and a legit fan base. It was fun though. Wheel barrel parades the Sunday following the LSU/Tulane game with both sides strongly represented. I really don’t see LSU going anywhere but the superdome if it were to strike back up, but even then it would seem to be 75-25 LSU fans even there.
Posted by AustinKnight
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
5842 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:40 am to
Definitely should be figured out and worked back into the schedule somehow in the next couple years. There is no reason to pay these out of state schools money when we can keep the money in state. I’m also sure there is a way to do a home and home but their home game would be in the Dome not in their stadium obviously but would be a hell of a fun time.
Posted by Baseball Tiger 17
Member since Jun 2017
727 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:46 am to
LSU stopped playing Tulane in baseball when they jacked the F out of prices to LSU fans for that one game.

That shite doesn’t fly.
Posted by Nolawavefan
Member since Aug 2013
16 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 1:56 am to
Many thanks to the recent responses.
I agree with the LSU approach as much as it hurts. I do think ending the weekday baseball home and home is unfair to several parties (LSU ALUM in NOLA and history). We are not some directional LA school but I digress.
It is sad that LSU would prefer some of their garbage 3 home OOC FBall games over TU, but I can understand ur POV, maybe TU would not agree to one off games in Tiger Stad, who knows.
It does frustrate me that the two nationally recognized universities in LA cannot play games against each other, business is business.
More comments would be appreciated.

...and yes increasing prices for TU/LSU baseball was the straw that broke the camel’s back. But isn’t that how LSU treats surge pricing for marquee games in all sports? It was a dammed if u do dammed if u don’t. TU baseball fans had to pay more as well. IDK
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 2:01 am
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 3:45 am to

This post has been marked unreadable!

Posted by RichardT
Covington, LA
Member since Mar 2005
1472 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:31 am to
Basketball and baseball wouldn't be that big a deal for home and home.

Football, on the other hand, is the goose that lays the golden egg. That would have to be in Tiger Stadium every year or part of an instate rotation with other state schools. The SEC requires its members to play at least one game against a team from a power five conference so that requires a lot of home and home or neutral site games. No way LSU does another home and home of any kind (not even 2 for 1) with a non power five opponent. Too much lost revenue.
Posted by ShawSawTheMoor
China Grove, Brazoria Co. TX FM 521
Member since Apr 2019
333 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:39 am to
From the late 50s to the early 70s Tulane was second only to the hated Ole Miss Rebels as a natural rival to LSU. This was especially so beginning in 1966, when Tulane hired Jim Pittman and became competitive in football.
Posted by El Campo Tiger
El Campo, TX
Member since Mar 2015
10118 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:46 am to
Only in the Superdome.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19303 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:16 am to
The last couple of times LSU played the weenies, once in the Dome, the others in TS, they did not sell out their ticket allotment. If they have no interest, why the hell should LSU care a flip? They are not actually a "La". school...when it comes to student body makeup. Last I read, 85% are from out of state, a large part from the East Coast. LSU gets zip from playing them in any sport. I am a long time LSU fan & know of literally no one who even mentions the weenies in any conversation about sports.
Posted by ShawSawTheMoor
China Grove, Brazoria Co. TX FM 521
Member since Apr 2019
333 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:25 am to
quote:

No way does LSU do home and home of any kind

quote:

Too much lost revenue

It would be notable to point out attendance figures of LSU-Tulane games played in the old Tulane Stadium, back in the day:

1966: 82,307
1972: 85,372
1973: 86,598

Each one of games features an attendance far greater than the Tiger Stadium games back in those days. In 1973, a vast majority in the stands were Tulane fans!

I believe a home and home vs Tulane (with the Tulane home game being played in the Dome) is possible with a restored rivalry, and as Tulane football once again gains prominence.
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:26 am to
quote:

and yes increasing prices for TU/LSU baseball was the straw that broke the camel’s back. But isn’t that how LSU treats surge pricing for marquee games in all sports?


The difference is this. LSU does raise prices for marquee games but the percentage of LSU fans vs. visiting fans that buy the tickets are the roughly the same no matter the game. Tulane did it knowing that the percentage of the away team buying the tickets would be way higher than an average Tulane game.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 7:27 am
Posted by rrboy
USA
Member since Jan 2005
5324 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:46 am to
Frick the weenies!
Posted by ShawSawTheMoor
China Grove, Brazoria Co. TX FM 521
Member since Apr 2019
333 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:47 am to
quote:

percentage of the away team buying the tickets

LSU seems to have a lackluster fan base for away games. There's no reason LSU fans can't buy up the tickets for an "away" game only 70 miles from their home. I've seen other teams' fans, notably Georgia, travel hundreds of miles to take over opponents' stadiums for football games. Look at their turnout in Tiger Stadium in 2018!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram