This game comes down to Leavitt and the O-Line

I feel like this is pretty obvious.

IMO, the play of the d line is going to be a huge factor in this game. Gotta constantly harass Trinidad to induce errors.

quote:

---

Clemson is poorly coached

---

LOL. Like him or not he has won 2 national championships in the last 10 years, and played for another. I mean, he might not be on the same level as Pete, but to say poorly coached is laughable.

Your entire breakdown is garbage basically. You talking about an offense of OM from last year that did so well. Have you watched them this year? There is a huge difference in the playcalling, and setting up future plays. Not a single mention by you of that. Don't be so emotional. LSU is the better team. Barring turnovers and special teams blunders, LSU wins this game, probably comfortably.

quote:

---

..because there was no threat of the long ball.

---

And what evidence do you see that we pose a "threat of the long ball?"
We've hit one deep ball and that was on a scramble by Sam and scramble by Tre who made an unbelievable catch. We haven't shown that we have a long ball threat and Sam is not exactly been accurate the few times we've taken a deep shot. Why should Ole Miss respect the long ball. We've been most effective on short and intermediate throws which is exactly what you said plagued us last year.

quote:

---

Secondly, our OL Scheme and play calling was horrendous.

---

Without a doubt. We can be encouraged by what we did against Clemson but the O-line didn't move anyone versus Tech even considering the 3-3-5 scheme that Tech employed. IMO, the jury is out on this O-line after two games. Regardless, it still comes down to whether the O-line performs well enough to generate an effective run game so they can't cheat by dropping more defenders.

Lastly, it's obvious that Sam may hold the ball too long at times and takes off and that he has some accuracy issues. In this day and age 62.1% completion is not outstanding.

quote:

---

Am I supposed to respect your opinion?

---

Really I have zero fricks to give whether you respect my opinion. It's just that an opinion. All I see is Ranters predicting a blow out by the Tigers and some ridiculous scores like we're going to dog walk them and that is highly unlikely.

quote:

---

This game comes down to Leavitt and the O-Line

---

Offensively? Yes, I agree. However, I think the two biggest keys to this game is our edge rushers vs Ole Miss tackles and our CBs vs their Receivers. If we get into a shootout that favors Ole Miss and Chambliss. We need to keep the game in a defensive game and keep Ole Miss offense on the sideline.

I agree with you. Leavitt has to make good decisions with the ball and the running game has to be successful in order for a Tiger victory. Defense also has to contain Chambliss. He is a game changer.

quote:

---

It’s on Leavitt

---

Needs to throw the ball to the guys wearing the same uniform.

Not sure why I'm replying to your ignorance.

quote:

---

Like him or not he has won 2 national championships in the last 10 years, and played for another. I mean, he might not be on the same level as Pete, but to say poorly coached is laughable.

---

Those days are in Dabo's distant rearview mirror. Even the Clemson website opine that the team is poorly coached. That doesn't even take into account that he's become a dinosaur by ignoring the portal and Clemson is way behind on having an effective GM or coordinated NIL program. His recent results don't lie. Look at any of the film reviews and they point out how unprepared Clemson appeared.

quote:

---

Your entire breakdown is garbage basically. You talking about an offense of OM from last year that did so well. Have you watched them this year? There is a huge difference in the playcalling, and setting up future plays.

---

Why yes I have watched them. Their play caller coached under Kiffin at Ole Miss and is totally familiar with the scheme. Chambliss is completing over 70% of his passes. They had almost 500 yards total offense vs Louisville and didn't break a sweat vs Charlotte. They look pretty much the same.

quote:

---

LSU is the better team. Barring turnovers and special teams blunders, LSU wins this game, probably comfortably.

---

LSU is overall the more talented team on defense but Ole Miss is more talented on offense. If the draft were held today, Chambliss and Lacy would go much higher than Leavitt or any of our backs. Alexander is lightning fast at receiver and is considered a high draft prospect.

The idea that we "probably" win comfortably can only be expressed through purple and gold glasses.

Always does.....

Maybe. I think it comes down to how inefficient we make Trinidad. The defense will be the difference maker. Cannot give chunk numbers to him. The offense will not get totally shut down. Shut down their passing game and make them one dimensional.