re: Summary of LSU-Bama officiating errors...WITH PHOTOS!

dude, just because you love Bama doesnt mean every play went their way.. you have spent the entire year on the SEC rant stroking their cock.. dont come in here and try to act all unbiased.. go back to the poli board and post some more of your random fricking nonsense..

There's no defending the interception bro, so the fact that you're trying to is simply displaying that you're just trying to pick a fight, which does not reflect well on yourself.

quote:

---

Once the ball hits PP's hands there are no bobble even when being transferred from out from his body towards his body.

---

Nobody ever said there was a bobble

quote:

---

Ever look into lasik?

---

Ever read the rule book?

JP, great thread. Needed to bump to be sure to find this tomorrow.

wow

Akaka, you have once again proven yourself to be incapable of officiating a game. Your lack of ability to see something with your eyes and correlate it with your rule book. We recently argued about UF left tackle lining up in the backfield. I have noticed in UF subsequent games that he is no longer lining up as far back as he did against LSU. By your inability to acknowledge Peterson having control of he ball with his left foot already clearly in bounds, which is all that is required, confirms your blindness. Most on this board acknowledge how difficult it was to make the call on the field as it happened so fast and the officials looking down the sideline may have had their vision obstructed by other players in their line of sight. However the replay clearly shows both feet touched in bounds with possession.

At the point that he spears jj, the zebra behind the play grimaces when jj get’s unloaded on! So he saw what took place. So he either A) does not understand the rules of the game or B) is deliberately not making the call,,,
This makes me feel like I’m watching wrestling!
It looks so scripted when the right calls are not being made in the big games, and it's so lop-sided!?
I wonder if LSU had beatin Florida, would the horrible calls, no calls in this game, have gone the other way??? The teams in the SEC are really fun to watch, and have great athletes (i.e. Julio’s run, and Peterson’s int.) Who knows what would have taken place within the final 5 minutes left in the game? The INT should have given the Tiger’s the ball at the 50 yrd line? There could have been 2 more incredible offensive scores by both teams, and ended on a defensive go ahead pick 6 with no time on the clock and Bama winning the game??? Who fricking knows, because the refs looked at the replay on High Def from all angles and FAILED to make the right call! Yes the Tiger’s could have made another great play and stop them again after the bad call, but anyone watching knew that was the end of the game, and so did the Ref that didn’t make the call!
This is the best conference in college football, yet the officiating is way below average (borderline CORRUPT, and the SEC in general off the field has lacked integrity lately in the Nation’s eyes.
Bottom line is both teams deserve to play 60 minutes of football and determine the outcome of the game themselves within the rules of the game!

quote:

---

I also think Bama got robbed on the spot that led to the LSU safety. An LSU player was standing at the 4 yard line, the ball hit at the 2 yard line and bounced toward the player, he put his hand down, and the ball changed direction back toward the goal line. That ball should have been placed at the 4 yard line, and if it had, the safety never would have happened.

---

You're reaching if that's the best you've got.

Congratulations to Bama. You guys played a great game, as did LSU. I have no ill-will toward you, your fans, your players or your coaches. We just wanted an opportunity to win the game in the fourth quarter, and we feel that opportunity was taken from us, and I'm sure you agree, as most Alabama fans I've spoken with do.

The "catch" of the ball begins when the ball touches the receiver's hands (in this case PP). At that moment when the ball touches the receiver's hands, he has one foot on the ground (his left). Subsequently, he tucks the ball without a bobble and proceeds to get a second foot inbounds (his right), which is technically moot b/c he's already gotten one foot in bounds AND is in the process of making an un-bobbled catch. A receiver does not have to have the ball tucked away and THEN get a foot inbounds. The "catch" begins the moment the ball touches the receivers hands. Learn the rules.

P.S. If this isn't true, the Arizona Cardinals got robbed out of Superbowl win last year.