- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: South Carolina already has more rushing yards
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:14 pm to Knuckle Checker
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:14 pm to Knuckle Checker
There’s no method to the madness. The SEC is fricking pandemonium.
0
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:15 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
They also have a running QB. Completely different dynamic.
yet same amount of points in the first half. Only difference was that LSU was in a very hostile environment doing it.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:20 pm to Knuckle Checker
All of our run plays are essentially based off of the RPO. When the entire world knows Nuss isn’t gonna run, it makes it pretty easy to scheme against. I almost think the O would be better off running a traditional under center/shotgun style offense.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:25 pm to TheBaker
quote:
All of our run plays are essentially based off of the RPO. When the entire world knows Nuss isn’t gonna run, it makes it pretty easy to scheme against.
Because it's a RPO doesn't mean the QB has to be the one running the ball. That's an added element. He could assist by getting those added yards as the field opens up for him to run. Defenses will continue to give it up because he hasn't shown he will do it. They'll take their chances in coverage because Nuss will key in on a guy (usually Lacy) who's double covered not even looking at Anderson or Green hell even the RB sometimes.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:28 pm to Knuckle Checker
I hope everybody claiming we need a new OC realizes Bryce Underwood is handcuffed to Sloan. If he goes so does Underwood.
With that said, I’m not happy with the offense either. But with a semi-mobile QB, his offense would be better.
With that said, I’m not happy with the offense either. But with a semi-mobile QB, his offense would be better.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:37 pm to armydude
I’m gonna post an unpopular opinion. I’ve not just watched but I’ve broken down the film copy of A&M, SCAR & USC and the running game is not Joe Sloan’s fault.
Sloan has actually done a pretty good job. I know yall won’t like that, but on tape, he hasn’t been the problem. I’ll go back and check but between 70-80% of the called runs were called against a 6 man box or less.
Sloan has actually done a pretty good job. I know yall won’t like that, but on tape, he hasn’t been the problem. I’ll go back and check but between 70-80% of the called runs were called against a 6 man box or less.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:06 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
I’m gonna post an unpopular opinion. I’ve not just watched but I’ve broken down the film copy of A&M, SCAR & USC and the running game is not Joe Sloan’s fault. Sloan has actually done a pretty good job. I know yall won’t like that, but on tape, he hasn’t been the problem. I’ll go back and check but between 70-80% of the called runs were called against a 6 man box or less.
Ok, so what’s your opinion of the problem? Our OL are bad at run blocking which then turns the attention to Brad Davis.
I don’t know what the issue is but I watch college football every Saturday and LSU with all their stars struggle as much as anyone
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:07 pm to Knuckle Checker
That last TD run was more than we had the entire game
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:10 pm to Datbayoubengal
LSU had zero rushing yards in the second half. You're saying the reason why we couldn't gain 1 yard rushing is because we don't have a dual threat QB?
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:16 pm to CAT
From what I’ve seen on film, we’ve really struggled with leaning and pad level. It’s causing us to allow defenders to get off blocks or we miss them entirely and the high pad level has hindered our ability to get push. I like Brad a lot as a coach but there’s no question in my mind, the issue in the run game has been fundamental, not as much scheme. The amount of times we have allowed backside penetration on counters and zone would nauseate you.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 11/3/24 at 1:35 am to LaFlamaBlanca1
quote:Go look at the rushing ranks, and then look at who has a QB that runs.
LSU had zero rushing yards in the second half. You're saying the reason why we couldn't gain 1 yard rushing is because we don't have a dual threat QB?
Posted on 11/3/24 at 1:36 am to Mandtgr47
quote:what was the final score again?
yet same amount of points in the first half. Only difference was that LSU was in a very hostile environment doing it.
Posted on 11/3/24 at 2:45 am to JiminyCricket
Its technique, they are too high consistently and there is no excuse for potential NFL players or coaches to be this poor even at the high school level.
If we have two first-round pics off the oline or even 2nd round that tells you everything you need to know, (unless you think you are a better football talent evaluator than 32 NFL teams) That would definitely mean they think they can fix the run block issues and the problem is with coaches and not players.
Also, the center is sun belt level at best, and the guards aren't great. Maybe will get better we will see
If we have two first-round pics off the oline or even 2nd round that tells you everything you need to know, (unless you think you are a better football talent evaluator than 32 NFL teams) That would definitely mean they think they can fix the run block issues and the problem is with coaches and not players.
Also, the center is sun belt level at best, and the guards aren't great. Maybe will get better we will see
Posted on 11/3/24 at 5:23 am to TutHillTiger
I’m not ready to bail on DJ completely yet. He’s still yiung and will be a better player for having gotten these reps.
Posted on 11/3/24 at 6:19 am to Knuckle Checker
Well since we ran on 2nd and 10 at least 6 times, what a joke play calling that was
Posted on 11/3/24 at 9:16 am to Datbayoubengal
Yes, I agree on that. But, we couldn't gain 1 yard
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News