- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So that one handed catch was totally not a catch, right?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:22 pm
the broadcast rushed through and didn't show the completed catch, but there's no way that ball didn't hit the ground.
38
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:23 pm to theliontamer
probably not a catch but wasn't 100% clear from replays
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to theliontamer
His hand was under it. It's time to stop complaining about calls as if it somehow changes the fact that we were outcoached and outplayed.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to theliontamer
Herbie was too busy cleaning the jizz off his face to worry about slowing down the replay enough but it did indeed appear that the ball hit the ground.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to theliontamer
Def not a catch.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to theliontamer
IDK but there was a play where our pass rusher literally got tackled that was a no call.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to Chicken
I thought it was fairly obvious the ball was rolling around on the ground.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:24 pm to theliontamer
I don’t think he caught it and I think there was a clear shot of him trapping it
Oh well
Oh well
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:26 pm to Chicken
quote:
probably not a catch but wasn't 100% clear from replays
This. I never saw an angle that showed it clearly touching the ground, but then it went to commercial so I have no idea what they got to review. Props to that receiver #10 tho, he made two incredible plays. He also one-handed the game-ender while getting popped pretty good.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:26 pm to theliontamer
1. The ball can hit the ground if the WR had controlled it prior and the ground does not cause him to lose control.
2. The play was ruled a catch on the field. There has to be indisputable evidence to overturn it. There wasn't.
2. The play was ruled a catch on the field. There has to be indisputable evidence to overturn it. There wasn't.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:29 pm to Alt26
it wasnt controlled prior, it was clearly floating around the air prior to going to the ground.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:29 pm to Chicken
Did you see how close our defender was to that ball. Damn close. Awesome catch.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:30 pm to TDsngumbo
If it was an LSU receiver, ABC would have pulled out the infared xray camera showing the ball hit the ground and that the review should be an easy overturn.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:30 pm to theliontamer
It was one of those plays where the call stands, not confirmed. Wasn’t enough evidence to overrule call on field. If it had been called incomplete on field, it would have stood on the review as well.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:30 pm to Jim Rockford
That was and still is my complaint about the officiating on that play. The Olineman had our rusher around the neck and pulling on the back of his jersey.
Definitely offensive holding.
Definitely offensive holding.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:31 pm to theliontamer
quote:
it wasnt controlled prior, it was clearly floating around the air prior to going to the ground.
His hand was under the ball pinning it into his stomach. It doesn't matter if the ball touches the ground at that point as long as it doesn't move. Of all the things to bitch about, this call might be the silliest.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:32 pm to 7thWardTo314
quote:
It was one of those plays where the call stands, not confirmed. Wasn’t enough evidence to overrule call on field. If it had been called incomplete on field, it would have stood on the review as well.
Exactly.
He had his hand under the ball and there wasn't an angle that unequivocally showed it wasn't a catch. If it's rule incomplete on the field they don't overturn it.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:35 pm to theliontamer
Another question is was the targeting call on Gilbert correct? When you see the play at full speed it seems like text book targeting. But I’m not sure Gilbert ever hit the WR’s helmet, and it looks like a pretty good tackle considering the circumstances.
What else was Gilbert supposed to do in that moment? He could’ve gone lower, I suppose, buy maybe he didn’t think he had to. By the time he hit him, it was a good candidate for targeting. To me, it simply seemed like a good attempt at getting the ball loose.
Some people might say it was one of the better efforts he gave that night. And unfortunately it turned into a big penalty
What else was Gilbert supposed to do in that moment? He could’ve gone lower, I suppose, buy maybe he didn’t think he had to. By the time he hit him, it was a good candidate for targeting. To me, it simply seemed like a good attempt at getting the ball loose.
Some people might say it was one of the better efforts he gave that night. And unfortunately it turned into a big penalty
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:38 pm to theliontamer
Good chance it wasn't, but they never showed a replay that was enough to overturn.
The real issue with that play was the horrendous no call on the holding.
The real issue with that play was the horrendous no call on the holding.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:38 pm to Alt26
There were two angles that showed clear as day that he lost control of the ball as he was bringing it in. It went down between his elbows, hit the ground, bounced into his gut and then he grabbed it back.
It DEFINITELY hit the ground. It was an amazing effort, but it should not have been ruled a catch.
It DEFINITELY hit the ground. It was an amazing effort, but it should not have been ruled a catch.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News