Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:478
Registered on:9/8/2019
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
I remember years ago during signing day for football, the first player to fax in his papers was a tight end named Zach pendarvis.

One poster was quite excited about this and, perhaps dizzy from the rumors, the signing sagas, and all the random decommitments occurring nationally, he said he wanted to have a roster of Zach pendarvis’ who were excited to be tigers and really wanted to be a tiger.

Fair enough, I suppose, but the funny thing was for some reason—probably because he was overshadowed by other talent on the roster—pendarvis never played a single down for LSU.

There are probably lots of people who would die to play for lsu—that doesn’t mean we would be happy to watch them.

In terms of our recent basketball strategy, I believe wade is trying to put the best team in the court; we want to be competitive, right? If this beats the instate talent, then I’m for it if it means we can win.

I also believe wade has mentioned that we won’t be using this heavy international approach for long, but if applied correctly, it can certainly be successful. Look at Illinois—they’ve been nicknamed the ‘Balkan bloc’ for targeting Europe and the balkans.

I think fans just want to see a winning product, and everyone agrees that wade can (and already has) been good at this. We’ll see how things go, but I think we agree this will beat what we’ve seen over the past four years
Several posters on here have said he’s a silent commitment who has yet to be made public. He’s waiting for his season to end apparently to make the announcement.

I’m not sure how certain anyone is, but that’s the word going around
Isn’t Kevin Thomas still on the team? Nobody is really talking about him, but I suspect he’d be a depth guy at this point who can take a little time to develop in the system.
He’s 6’7”, so I hope we don’t plan to play him at center. But I guess right now, as he’s supposedly the only guy on our roster, he might have to play all positions at once. If bugs bunny can do it, I bet he can, too
Wilkinson has shown he can put it into the bucket, but the question is can he keep the opposing team from doing it?

It’s still better than just about anyone we’ve had over the past few years, but we need defensive stoppers as much as we need scorers
It also says basketball rather than football, so I suppose you’re seeing his basketball numbers
He had a great game dishing it tonight. It’s great to see a true freshman develop in the absence of Thomas.
Is it me or do McMahon’s teams seem to play a little better when they have fewer players?

re: McNeese 7 @ LSU 6 Final

Posted by Horizon Imperial on 2/24/26 at 10:13 pm to
A perfect example of why baseball is such a crazy sport, why a box score doesn’t always tell the whole story, and how bad crap can happen to anyone for bizarre reasons
Why not tag close to the bag? You know that’s where the runner will end up. The throw had him
The whole football-is-king argument is fine for you and others to have, but it’s purely opinion.

It doesn’t mean that basketball can’t succeed. It doesn’t mean that the department can’t take it very seriously.

Basketballl should be heavily supported despite who is so-called king.

I bet three years ago everyone in Indiana believed basketball was king. There’s enough in the state and the surrounding area for both sports to be very successful—rank them as you wish but that’s all subjective
I think it’s clear that we hired a nice, calm, ‘clean’ personality to try and self-impose restrictions on ourselves before any worse could be done—at least that’s what it looks like looking back.

The joke is on us. We really went out of our way to screw ourselves regardless of if that was our intention. I think initially at least we thought we might be getting a good coach but morant, like Favre in football as previously mentioned, had much to do with any success.

Now I hope we get serious, get ambitious about basketball, and pull off a great hire. We are one good hire (and a major commitment to nil) away from possibly dominating the sec in all major sports, including women’s basketball, which is a subjective call if you want to put it among the likes of men’s basketball, football and baseball.

What is clear is that we shouldn’t screw around any more, nor should we doubt that lsu can be at the top of all major sports.
I think we’re so bad eventually we take the will to win away from our opponents.

Is it ok that I’m thinking about football while watching the basketball box score (not even the game)?

If we start to care about hoops, we could be great, much like women’s basketball, football and baseball
I hate to say it, but whatever brings us a new coach and a renewed commitment to lsu basketball is good with me.

Sometimes I guess the ends do justify the means
There’s no reason we can’t spend some money to get a coach that can motivate, evaluate, maximize talent and develop a roster. It just takes a little money, and it doesn’t seem to be in short supply.

If they don’t do it, it’s not because they can’t; it simply because they don’t care enough. And sadly that might be where we find ourselves
We’re seeing the difference between an effective coach (vandy’s) and one that, well, hasn’t been so effective.

The difference is clear and could be changed easily. And that change could have a quick and dramatic effect on the product on the floor. I hope lsu brass is learning… I don’t know what’s hindering them
At least we have $6M to spend elsewhere…

It it’s not difficult to see that this would happen

re: Portal News | Day 7

Posted by Horizon Imperial on 1/8/26 at 2:28 pm to
Did gulkner visit? I believe he was scheduled to come in but instead committed to msu.

What sense does it make to commit without testing all the waters? Unless we rescinded the offer, which I doubt based on his tape… I was excited about this kid actually. Kinda sucks but I suppose we must move on