
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SFPLCs buddy spills the beans on Lawfare
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:04 pm
Ruh-roe Raggie!
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:27 pm to Azkiger
SFP and his merry band of concerned moderates will be here soon to tell us this is not true until it’s covered by CNN.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:29 pm to Azkiger
In the DataRepublican #3 Democracy Files drop you've also got these DSA folks talking to legal people from outside of this country on how to use mobs to engage in lawfare. There was a "constitutional lawyer" from Ecuador basically saying that people were calling him a fool for trying to take a case before a court that was put in place by the government they had just toppled thinking he would win, but he explained how courts and judges being "rational people" will side with him anyways due to pressure from their "mobilization effort" (mobs paid to riot).
But yeah, lawfare doesn't exist according to Slippin' Jimmy.
There is not a more dishonest poster on this board than that frickin clown.
But yeah, lawfare doesn't exist according to Slippin' Jimmy.
There is not a more dishonest poster on this board than that frickin clown.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:30 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Lawfare
Still waiting on an operative definition of this
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:
But yeah, lawfare doesn't exist
Who said that? Where?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:32 pm to Azkiger
There are people who will go to their grave after having destroyed the greatest nation in the history of the world, and will never admit they are why.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:34 pm to BoarEd
quote:
There is not a more dishonest poster on this board than that frickin clown.
You can't make this shite up, folks.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still waiting on an operative definition of this

Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still waiting on an operative definition of this
Here comes his chance to drag the conversation about what both sides know is happening into semantics and contrarian douchebaggery, while not ever really saying anything of substance in the process, so he doesn’t get his teeth kicked down his throat when this circles back around next week.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:35 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You can't make this shite up, folks.
The fact you don't understand the difference in those 2 posts says it al
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who said that? Where?
if you don't know the definition, how you can say if it exists for not
weird
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:36 pm to G2160
quote:
Here comes his chance to drag the conversation about what both sides know is happening into semantics and contrarian douchebaggery, while not ever really saying anything of substance in the process so he doesn’t get his teeth kicked down his throat when this circles back around next week.
If people broke the law, should they be prosecuted?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:36 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
if you don't know the definition, how you can say if it exists for not
weird
The fact this went over your head says it all
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:36 pm to G2160
quote:
Here comes his chance to drag the conversation about what both sides know is happening into semantics and contrarian douchebaggery, while not ever really saying anything of substance in the process, so he doesn’t get his teeth kicked down his throat when this circles back around next week.
It’s a pretty good gig if you can get it
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:37 pm to G2160
quote:
Here comes his chance to drag the conversation about what both sides know is happening into semantics and contrarian douchebaggery, while not ever really saying anything of substance in the process, so he doesn’t get his teeth kicked down his throat when this circles back around next week.
Precisely. If you point this out it becomes "you just don't understand the difference between my comments."
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:37 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:You mean bury the thread by posting 100 times, while waiting for an ambulance to drive by.
SFP and his merry band of concerned moderates will be here soon to tell us this is not true until it’s covered by CNN.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still waiting on an operative definition of this
Purposefully targeting your political opponents legally, with the intent of scaring others from joining leadership positions being a motivating factor.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:40 pm to Azkiger
Lawfare isn't even a word. Jack Smith is my hero from the Hague. My porn is reading Andrew Weismann @ the lawfare blog, thinking about Comey's long sexy legs wrapped around a random rock he poses with-SFP
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:41 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Purposefully targeting your political opponents legally, with the intent of scaring others from joining leadership positions being a motivating factor.
Isn't deterrence ("scaring others") part of prosecuting people who broke the law?

Popular
Back to top

8










