- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scheme change to 4-3
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:48 pm to OchoDedos
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:48 pm to OchoDedos
No body was stopping LSU this season. The point is, one of the best DCs in the country and a 4-3 guy, felt a 3 man front was the most effective way to stop the best offense in the country.
Also, for most of the game it was a 3-2-6 with Simmons and Skalski at LB. They also had a S that was playing a Jacoby Steven style hybrid role at times, making it close to a 3-3-5 stack.
Also, for most of the game it was a 3-2-6 with Simmons and Skalski at LB. They also had a S that was playing a Jacoby Steven style hybrid role at times, making it close to a 3-3-5 stack.
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 4:50 pm
0
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:54 pm to classicgold
quote:
We also have Jacoby Stevens on the back end next year to play the perfect hybrid in a 4-2-5.
Who are your DEs in this 4-3? You can’t go to a 4-3 anytime soon. Don’t have the players.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:57 pm to SpencerRob
quote:
It does probably mean K’Lavon May leave if he thinks the scheme change is bad for him.
K’Lavon would have double digit sack numbers in a 4-3 scheme though
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:59 pm to ELchapoLSU
quote:
K’Lavon would have double digit sack numbers in a 4-3 scheme though
Lol what? Less simulated pressures equals more sacks?
Posted on 1/16/20 at 4:59 pm to redfishfan
quote:this, I cant imagine we change it up. We are stacked with recruits to run the 3 man fronts
Plus we’ve been recruiting to a 3 man front with a standup backer. O will want same scheme.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:01 pm to ELchapoLSU
quote:Huh? It would be a terrible use of him.
K’Lavon would have double digit sack numbers in a 4-3 scheme though
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:02 pm to SpencerRob
This shyt won’t fly with these spread offenses.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:03 pm to SpencerRob
After Ole Miss we went more 4-3 with Chaisson standing.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:06 pm to Overpaid Dave
Good. No more rush 3 and drop 8.....and the other team make every third and long.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:06 pm to ArcticTiger
quote:
After Ole Miss we went more 4-3 with Chaisson standing.
So a 3-4
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:13 pm to TigerBlitz03
quote:
Run whatever the Niners run..its impressive
Bosas popping out any more kiddos?
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:36 pm to SpencerRob
quote:
It does probably mean K’Lavon May leave if he thinks the scheme change is bad for him.
He's gone already. He just hasn't announced it yet. Moreover, he won't know what the scheme will be before Monday, in any event.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 5:39 pm to cra_cra
quote:
Just a lot of old school folks posting about this that don't understand the 3-4. With how offenses are evolving, the 3-4 is a much better option.
You do realize that the 34 has been around for decades, don’t you? It has nothing to do with being old or old-school.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:01 pm to redfishfan
quote:
Plus we’ve been recruiting to a 3 man front with a standup backer. O will want same scheme.
This. Remember when we were having trouble turning 4-3 DTs into 3-4 NTs and (lesser extent) DEs? We would have the same problem turning 350 lb. 3-4 NTs into 4-3 DTs. Perhaps the greater concern is turning 3-4 DEs or OLBs into 4-3 DEs.
It takes different personnel and it’s a completely different style of play from what our guys have been taught all this time under Aranda. I also don’t think we have enough experienced DL depth to just up and switch to a 4-3. I will say that a lot of the freshmen we have coming in could very well play in a 4-3 defense. But how many freshmen do you want in your DL rotation?
3-4 is built to stop the spread offense. We may go to more simulated 4-man fronts but I would be surprised if we went straight to a base 4-3 in one year.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:02 pm to SpencerRob
Whatever the most successful college football defenses are running, that's the scheme LSU should run.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:07 pm to SpencerRob
Nah, weve been trying to recruit for a 3-4 since 2015.
People didnt like Steele, but hes done well at auburn. He came and we changed schemes without the rt personnel.
People didnt like Steele, but hes done well at auburn. He came and we changed schemes without the rt personnel.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:08 pm to LSU615
quote:
You do realize that the 34 has been around for decades, don’t you? It has nothing to do with being old or old-school.
I was basing it upon the fact that traditionally, LSU has been a 4-3 team, at least as long as I've been alive. Though, I don't really know what you'd call Tepper's drop linebacker thingy.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:14 pm to SammyTiger
Uh No as there was no standing Lb on the opposite side. I guess you never watched our D when Mingo was here?
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:19 pm to ArcticTiger
If you don’t have 4 down linemen you’re not in a 4-3
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 6:22 pm to SpencerRob
4-3 isn’t really a thing anymore
5 & 6 DBs on the field at a time is much more common
No sense in fighting over what to call it.
5 & 6 DBs on the field at a time is much more common
No sense in fighting over what to call it.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News