1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember, there's no such thing as lawfare...
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Can you not answer those questions honestly?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:00 am to udtiger
56 million in grants to 175 minority focused ngos that only claim that tag so they get preferential placement at the govt teat.
They counsel people on how to buy a home? Ya really think thats what they do? For three people while they pocket the rest and spend some to pay people to protest.
I really wish the fed govt would just ignore these cases, the judge has no standing on this issue. Just cut the funding and let the advocacy groups waste time and money trying to get to the supreme court.
They counsel people on how to buy a home? Ya really think thats what they do? For three people while they pocket the rest and spend some to pay people to protest.
I really wish the fed govt would just ignore these cases, the judge has no standing on this issue. Just cut the funding and let the advocacy groups waste time and money trying to get to the supreme court.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
“ I'll give an example. Alabama just passed a patently illegal law (death penalty for sex offenders). Was that law fare?”
It is without doubt a fair law. It is not just about tying up people in court regardless of it’s merits, which is what lawfare intentions are.
It is without doubt a fair law. It is not just about tying up people in court regardless of it’s merits, which is what lawfare intentions are.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
I thought NY went after Trump to sling more mud on him and keep his name in the headlines in a bad way.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
According to…you?
I don't use it so no. I am not the one creating infinite definitions and uses of the term
No, you are not creating any definitions. However, you are rejecting definitions of the term. On top of that, not only do you reject other definitions, but you offer no such opinion. Thus, in my opinion, your words are worthless.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:01 am to faraway
quote:
patently illegal law
please explain that way. which law is it violating? cruel and unusual are very subjective, thus not "patently" illegal.
Do yourself and the sophisticated contrarian troll a favor......don't feed the troll.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:01 am to Branson
quote:
Can you not answer those questions honestly?
I did. You're proving my point by adding more definitions. My argument is at the term is malleable and people change the definition for the argument and you just gave several examples proving my point
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
…Que?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:02 am to Nosevens
quote:
It is without doubt a fair law. It is not just about tying up people in court regardless of it’s merits
The only way that law ever becomes enforced is by tying up people in court
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:03 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Do yourself and the sophisticated contrarian troll a favor......don't feed the troll.
That was a really bad response to make your ignorant comment.
The law is patently illegal and there is precedent that I cited. There's nothing contrarian about being right
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:04 am to BeeFense5
Mostly ignorant statement as it’s the democrats using their subversive tactics to push further destructive policies or use courts to get injunctions on reasonable policies or actions even in cases where existing laws exist, such as illegal immigration or illegal voting
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
“ It's a nonsense term with no set definition”
Kind of like democrats thoughts on biological men and women. Well that and American citizens as democrats think that illegals are actually lawful citizens.
Kind of like democrats thoughts on biological men and women. Well that and American citizens as democrats think that illegals are actually lawful citizens.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're mis-stating the argument
From someone who openly admit they dont know what a globalist agenda is, I think its best we dont take your word on what this argument is either
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I am always right you people listen to me I am right always!
about being right
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:14 am to Jbird
quote:
about being right
I am always right you people listen to me I am right always!
SloMoFo is very high IQ too. His/her mental horsepower is unmatched on this forum.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:15 am to dalefla
You actually think that you would get a honest response? Generally speaking when he gets cornered he stands down in his retorts
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:16 am to Bass Tiger
quote:Historical mental brain power!
SloMoFo is very high IQ too. His/her mental horsepower is unmatched on this forum.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
I like most people who believe in the reason for such a law would like to see them tied up. Just in the town square and the knots around the neck dangling
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Alabama just passed a patently illegal law (death penalty for sex offenders). Was that law fare? Will it become law fare if they ever try to enforce it? Will appealing a ruling be law fare? Can its law fare status be cleansed with a wholesale change in the law by the USSC?
Why would that be an example of lawfare?
It is a direct attempt to challenge the Kennedy decision. They're trying to get the current SCOTUS to reverse that precedent.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only way that law ever becomes enforced is by tying up people in court
Again, that's not the purpose of it.
They are expecting the first person who gets sentenced to death under it to challenge it legally. That's what they want.
Just like the state legislatures did with abortion to get Roe V Wade overturned.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News