Started By
Message

re: Question for board lawyers. Does suing LSU and not Texas hurt the SEC’s case?

Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:23 pm to
Posted by BROpaneTANK
Mandeville
Member since Apr 2010
3128 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

he Texas players didn't sign contracts with the NFL teams.


Yet he was ineligible before the same brand of TRO. The SEC’s hyper fixated focus on this specific case is going to hurt its overall case. As it should.

By allowing these other players they’re effectively admitting the 5 for 5 should’ve included the class of 2022. Which then gives merit to players that “declared” just because they thought they had to and went through camps.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1343 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:23 pm to
Yeah gtfo bitch
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
37021 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

The Texas players didn't sign contracts with the NFL teams.

They participated in camps. Are we playing semantics?


This is like Bill Clinton saying he never enhaled marijuana. Look, if the LSU guys had gotten some $10M signing bonus there would be a clear separation. But young Cole just getting some work in before going back to his studies is like something Wally Cleaver would say on Leave it to Beaver.
Posted by Tank77
Member since Mar 2019
1150 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:29 pm to
And the fact that Mizzou and Kentucky were recruiting TJ Harden. And if the idiots who always pushback against Cole Hutson with he didn’t sign a contract. Harden actually signed a contract and played in a preseason game. The players that LSU recruited also were recruited by other teams so this is stupid
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
5279 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to
Did the Texas player receive ONE MOTHERFLUCKING penny or more in per diem, equipment, clothing, heath/injury care compensation from an NFL team??????

Did they sign any agreement to settle any disputes with arbitration, a potential injury settlement if injured during NFL camp etc...?

Of course they did. That is a MOTHERFLUCKING contract.
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
22202 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

The Texas players didn't sign contracts with the NFL teams.

Which is only a point because the SEC hastily and reactively spun up a policy that cleared Texas but not LSU.
Posted by AgsinGA
Marietta
Member since Dec 2018
98 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:36 pm to
Sorry I missed it.

Did it hurt your feelings?


Posted by LSUminati
Member since Jan 2017
4215 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:38 pm to
Yes, the SEC just exposed themselves to a massive countersuit and damages from LSU. Sankey will be fired by the end of this. Stay strong Tiger fans.
Posted by Jebadeb
Member since Oct 2017
5939 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:38 pm to
No, did I hurt your feelings?
Posted by Walnut
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2014
3974 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:49 pm to
I just had a thought while discussing this with a friend who is a Florida fan. Is there a particular reason the SEC’s position had to be written to basically only exclude LSU from signing more players? They could have easily just said the class of 2022 is ineligible, and fought with Ole Miss instead with a more air tight position. Seems like they set themselves up to fail by trying to let it go on for everybody but one coach and school.
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
288 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to
You know why
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram