- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Phil Steele has LSU ranked 7th in the SECW and outside the T60 in his preseason rankings.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:07 pm
He mentions lack of returning starters (LSU with 11) compared to others, but the average number of starters returning in the SEC is 13 with Mississippi St leading the way with 17.
Honestly, are we better off with returning starters after we include starters we added from the transfer portal?
I’m sure when LSU finishes much higher than his projections, Steele will point to some obscure comment that he can count as a correct prediction.
LINK
Honestly, are we better off with returning starters after we include starters we added from the transfer portal?
I’m sure when LSU finishes much higher than his projections, Steele will point to some obscure comment that he can count as a correct prediction.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 9:21 pm
39
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:11 pm to Blutarsky
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:18 pm to Blutarsky
I wouldn't listen to that idiot. His ‘Steele locks of the week picks’, are 90% incorrect (straight up pick’em and/or versus spread).
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:19 pm to Blutarsky
He also had Washington as his surprise team last year and they were dogshite.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:21 pm to Blutarsky
O-line seems like addition by subtraction despite the the draft picks.
The old regime had shite in such turmoil projections seem impossible.
The old regime had shite in such turmoil projections seem impossible.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:21 pm to WisconsinTiger85
Some info for you guys in the link.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:26 pm to Blutarsky
So what
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:29 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
So what
I see you’re new here.
This is a message board where we discuss such things, even shitty preseason projections.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:34 pm to Blutarsky
What did Steele predict for us in 2019 ?
He is a Clown.
He is a Clown.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:49 pm to Blutarsky
Steele is a washed up relic
He hasn’t been accurate since the mid 2000s
He still thinks it’s the 90s where things like “returning experience” are key record for good seasons
He hasn’t been accurate since the mid 2000s
He still thinks it’s the 90s where things like “returning experience” are key record for good seasons
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:51 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
He still thinks it’s the 90s where things like “returning experience” are key record for good seasons
Transfers have completely wrecked that mindset.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:53 pm to Blutarsky
Is he rating transfers and adding that in? If not, his shite is useless
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:55 pm to Blutarsky
Phil Steele is the biggest hack in the game.
His books are filled with why he is the greatest, and inaccurate info that he conveniently retroactively changes to make himself right. Example: Notre Dame was number 19 on my dark horse teams that might possibly could make the playoffs!
His books are filled with why he is the greatest, and inaccurate info that he conveniently retroactively changes to make himself right. Example: Notre Dame was number 19 on my dark horse teams that might possibly could make the playoffs!
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:05 pm to Blutarsky
Idgaf about no preseason rankings.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:07 pm to josh336
quote:
Is he rating transfers and adding that in? If not, his shite is useless
He does include them in the individual position rankings, but I don’t see him thoroughly evaluating guys like Banks, Frazier, Shorts, Cain, Foucha, Brooks, Weeks, Wingo, Garner, Lacy, Fields, JBC, etc as starter/key player additions to the team as a whole.
Except, when he ranks Ricks as a 1st team AA at Alabama.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:10 pm to Blutarsky
In the age of college free agency, the idea of predicting seasons based on returning starters is laughable.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:12 pm to Blutarsky
Magazine guys like this don’t matter anymore with the transfer portal. By the time they come out some team could add a key impact player
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:59 pm to Blutarsky
I mean logically it makes sense. The program went to shite within 2 years of a natty. BK has done well with recruiting and the portal out of necessity.
That said 90% of the optimism is placed on total unknowns and the belief that an entirely new staff can turn shite around super quick with an unproven and depleted roster. I'm not a huge Steele fan but his comments aren't exactly a reach if you're thinking rationally.
That said 90% of the optimism is placed on total unknowns and the belief that an entirely new staff can turn shite around super quick with an unproven and depleted roster. I'm not a huge Steele fan but his comments aren't exactly a reach if you're thinking rationally.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 11:10 pm to Srbtiger06
I wish every prognosticator would pick us so low.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News