- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Overturned "scoop and score" for OSU...what are the thoughts?
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:48 pm to Awlunz Tiger
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:48 pm to Awlunz Tiger
Whoever was the ESPN officiating person said he thought it was incomplete so I’m not sure what they’re teaching those folks.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:49 pm to Awlunz Tiger
Looked like a fumble to me.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:50 pm to Awlunz Tiger
All I know is the guy had the ball without it moving for like 3 steps. Yea he didn’t tuck it, but so what. IDGAF who LSU plays. I would have been happy to either of those two coaches lose, but they need to clarify this football move bullshite
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:52 pm to GeauxGoose
I thought it was the right call. Live speed it was incomplete. When you slow it down you can find football moves if you want. It was very similar to Jefferson’s in our game.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:54 pm to Awlunz Tiger
I thought it was the right call
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:55 pm to Awlunz Tiger
The ref the announcers talked to said it would be overturned. When he explained it, it made sense to me.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:55 pm to Awlunz Tiger
Imagine if he caught the ball near the sideline and the ball landed out of bounds. They would have definitely called it incomplete because he didn’t finish the catch. That happens all of the time.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:56 pm to Awlunz Tiger
I think it was a catch and fumble. Anyone surprised that the officiating crew being scrutinized is from the SEC?
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:56 pm to Awlunz Tiger
Look at it in full speed!
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:57 pm to Revelator
I think it was incomplete, but not inconclusive...That is a tough replay to overturn. I would of kept whatever was called on the field.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:57 pm to Awlunz Tiger
My thought is that I have no fricking idea what the rational is for that not being a catch. He wasn't bobbling it. He had full control.
Total absurdity
Total absurdity
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:58 pm to Awlunz Tiger
FWIW, the TV in-game rules "expert" said it was not a catch before the official ruling came down. Tough call. Reminded me of the Jace Sternberger play in last year's A&M game.
This post was edited on 12/29/19 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 12/29/19 at 8:59 pm to Awlunz Tiger
He took 3 if not 4 steps after catch and ball was never loose until defender forced it out. Even if it was a close call and some say it could go either way then it should have gone with the call on the field which was catch/fumble.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:02 pm to Awlunz Tiger
The official they went to in the studio said it was an incompletion w/o hesitation, so I guess they got it right based on how officials translate the rule. I on the other hand thought it was clearly a fumble. The guy took like 3 steps and the ball never moved. If that’s not a football move then I don’t know what is anymore.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:02 pm to bayou85
From the moment it happened, I said no catch. Still stand by that!
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:03 pm to Awlunz Tiger
BAD CALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:04 pm to Awlunz Tiger
If they didn’t call it a turnover for us last year in A&M game they sure as H weren’t going to call this one a catch. The one last year for the A&M player was way more blatant than that one.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:07 pm to Awlunz Tiger
The three steps were while he was gathering the ball. Whether it takes one step or three or more to land and gather himself, it's not a "football move" separate from the catch.
He didn't turn upfield at all, never had a chance, because he was still catching the ball.
If I'm interpreting that correctly, they would do better to drop "football move" and define it as any action that is distinct from the catch and happens after catch is complete.
He didn't turn upfield at all, never had a chance, because he was still catching the ball.
If I'm interpreting that correctly, they would do better to drop "football move" and define it as any action that is distinct from the catch and happens after catch is complete.
This post was edited on 12/29/19 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:11 pm to Awlunz Tiger
It's like they basically said, you can hold the ball over your head with both hands and run the length of the foorball field, get the ball knocked out and it's an incomplete pass because he didn't tuck it away or make a football move
Popular
Back to top



0



