- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Orgeron fights back against Louisiana Supreme Court ruling that he owes ex-wife $8 million
Posted on 7/11/25 at 5:41 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 7/11/25 at 5:41 pm to lsupride87
quote:
When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together and his life from shambles thus allowing his career to continue is a big part of him getting to earning that buyout
How do you know this?
0
Posted on 7/11/25 at 5:48 pm to timlan2057
quote:
My guess is he put 8 million of that 16 in the bank. How much of that eight has he blown through in the last four years?
And “20 law firms”? I don’t think they’re working pro bono. I don’t blame him for appealing because that ruling where he has to hand her a full chunk of eight million likely means that Orgeron is broke.
It’s weird to me that people are okay saying this kind of stuff just because you don’t like the way his time here ended
It’s borderline fascinating to me. You don’t like someone, so in your mind it’s okay to just make stuff up and go with it
Posted on 7/11/25 at 5:52 pm to Mr. Hangover
Just dropping in to remind everyone that in terms of 15-0 seasons:
Orgeron: 1
Saban: 0
Orgeron: 1
Saban: 0
This post was edited on 7/11/25 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 7/11/25 at 5:54 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Standard filing. Almost never works.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:22 pm to lsupride87
Weren’t his grown sons on the coaching staff around 2019?
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:40 pm to Havoc
8 million seems a little high to me but there used to be a lot of Tulane grads on the Court
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Why not?
When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together and his life from shambles thus allowing his career to continue is a big part of him getting to earning that buyou
The conduct of either spouse has little to do with how they share community property. If the money was earned during the marriage, she gets half. She could have been the drunk and belligerent one, the result would be the same. And I have no knowledge or opinion on what spouse behaved poorly.
I agree with whoever wrote that the odds of getting a 5-2 decision overturned are very slight. I doubt they are presenting any new argument not argued at the hearing.
Adding 20 law firms doesnt bolster the argument.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:24 pm to lsupride87
quote:
When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together and his life from shambles thus allowing his career to continue is a big part of him getting to earning that buyout
They were separated when the buyout occurred?
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:25 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He earned that buyout while married though
The buyout is the remainder of the contract and hadn’t yet been earned obviously.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:26 pm to paper tiger
If they can provide proof with previous cases that were similar and judgements different then the Supreme Court will reopen it. Won’t be easy. His attorneys are licking their chops in billable hours.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
application for rehearing
Application denied. Get the checkbook out coonass.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
he gon run da joe brady appellate application for rehearing
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:40 pm to Penrod
quote:
If the ruling stands he'll get most of that back.
He will get a credit/offset for what he paid to maintain community property.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:46 pm to Solo Cam
Why not? They were legally married when he signed his extension.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:50 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
It’s weird to me that people are okay saying this kind of stuff just because you don’t like the way his time here ended It’s borderline fascinating to me. You don’t like someone, so in your mind it’s okay to just make stuff up and go with it
Where did I “make anything up” in that post you responded to? Go ahead. I’ll wait until you get specific.
Asking legitimate questions with plausible suppositions is not “making things up.” Goddamn, you’re dumb. But this is the Rant and dumbasses like you inhabit it.
This post was edited on 7/11/25 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:16 pm to Lakeboy7
Yeah. He’s fricked.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:26 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
“May it please the Court:”
“Do you know how many boob jobs I’ve promised to pay for?”
“Respectfully submitted …”
“Do you know how many boob jobs I’ve promised to pay for?”
“Respectfully submitted …”
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:00 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Why not? They were legally married when he signed his extension.
Is it your understanding that a spouse is entitled to half of everything earned even after a marriage ends?
Do you believe that spouse is entitled to half of money earned after divorce because a contract is signed during marriage?
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:02 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Don’t get divorced…
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:05 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
as to why she would deserve that.
I mean the media made a pretty big deal about how she decorated the office when he was named interim coach
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News