re: Ok, honest question: Would we be 10-0 if JJ had started the season?

Posted by rchamp

New Jersey

Member since Nov 2008

256 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:28 pm to Jellyworm

wonder how long it will take for JL to bail out JJ - Will it be a mishandled snap? clock management? underthrow? showboating?

Posted by oleheat

Sportsman's Paradise

Member since Mar 2007

14524 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:29 pm to ready4something

quote:
I know we would be 9-1 if he didn't play last week.

And that's ok you feel that way.

Myself- I am thankful we had Jarrett Lee this season to lead this team when some weren't available to do so.

Posted by dreaux

baton rouge

Member since Oct 2006

40882 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:30 pm to TIGRLEE

This qb juggling will cost us the NC.

Posted by sheek

New Albany, OH

Member since Sep 2007

44131 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:31 pm to oleheat

I would have to say yes.

Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger

Baton Rouge

Member since Sep 2005

6883 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:31 pm to TIGRLEE

quote:
Or just like we did vs Fla, tenn and Au?

Pretty much.

I will add, I had no problem watching JJ play more against Bama. I just wanted LSU to win- and I think most people are that way when it comes down to it. For that night, he seemed to be the fit.

Posted by Armymann50

Playing with my

Member since Sep 2011

21844 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:31 pm to cementer

quote:
HELL NO we would not !!!

this x 5

Posted by TriumphTiger

Alpharetta, GA

Member since Sep 2007

10436 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:31 pm to oleheat

Posted by ready4something

virginia beach

Member since Jul 2008

6541 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:36 pm to CHSvideoman

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
Yes. But only because JL would come in just about every game and bail JJ's arse out once again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revisionist history. JL came in against Bama and threw for a first down. however JJ had over 200 yards passing and a td. JL came in against Florida admirable job. wouldn't have won without him. Lee came in against Tennessee and threw a long completion to get us in a position to win however he threw 2 ints in the game which would have prevented it from being so close. JJ came in against bama and got Lee a win. It is a team sport. I'm sure the team has no problem being 10-0. its only some of you fringe fans.

Posted by bigsky

Member since Sep 2006

11 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:36 pm to Armymann50

You Lee fans should tell your boy to stop throwing inexcusable interceptions against Alabama. He seemed to be returning to the decision making skills of his pick 6 days.

2 ...

Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger

Baton Rouge

Member since Sep 2005

6883 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:37 pm to bigsky

quote:
You Lee fans should tell your boy to stop throwing inexcusable interceptions against Alabama. He seemed to be returning to the decision making skills of his pick 6 days

Dude. Wow.

Posted by TwinkleToez

NOLA

Member since Sep 2011

1080 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:38 pm to oleheat

yes

Posted by Wolfhound45

Member since Nov 2009

125791 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:40 pm to oleheat

In my opinion?

No.

But we are 10-0 and that is all that matters.

Posted by tigerbait16

Member since Apr 2011

729 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:41 pm to oleheat

no.

Posted by LaBornNRaised

Loomis blows

Member since Feb 2011

11010 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:41 pm to TigersSEC2010

quote:
Yes. But only because JL would come in just about every game and bail JJ's arse out once again.

Posted by Tiger_n_ATL

Ft. Lauderdale

Member since Jul 2005

33211 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:42 pm to Bottom9

quote:
yet another JJ vs. JL argument

# 2,335

Posted by moneyg

Member since Jun 2006

61896 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:43 pm to oleheat

quote:
Ok, honest question: Would we be 10-0 if JJ had started the season?

If you want me to be honest...then yes.

quote:
I'm just not convinced he'd have put up the kind of numbers JL had to this point

That's a different question altogether.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber

Juneau, AK

Member since Jan 2009

295141 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:44 pm to ready4something

quote:
its only some of you fringe fans.

Which you are one of.

LSU could be 10-0 with either QB

Posted by just me

Front of the Class: Schooling You

Member since Mar 2006

34489 posts

Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:45 pm to oleheat

I think we would be 10-0 if just about any QB had had started the season.

Oregon: Lee was 10 of 22 for 98 yards; Lee was not the difference in the game.

Northwestern State: My mother could have won this game for LSU.

Mississippi State: The defense shut State down. They could not score on LSU. We had short fields all night.

West Virginia: Ware and Ford combined for 170 yards rushing. Lee completed 57% of his passes for 6.4 ypa. This is well within Jefferson's capabilities.

Kentucky: Lee went 8 for 21. That's not a spectacular day. This is well within Jefferson's capabilities.

Florida: Florida was the first of three headless opponents in a row. LSU had 238 yards rushing. Florida had no shot.

Tennessee: LSU rushed for 237 yards. Lee had 138 yards passing. Efficient but not close to being spectacular. LSU scored enough on Jefferson's drives to win the game. Simms completed 30% of his passes. Tennessee had no shot.

Auburn: Third headless opponent in a row. Jefferson had 54 yards passing against Auburn. LSU scored enough on defense and Jefferson drives to beat Auburn.