
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
O line off-season additions
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:29 pm
In the off-season the OL seemed by far the most concerning as far as personnel additions, obviously sticking with Davis seemed questionable. I'm assuming they expected Harper would win a starting spot. To me it just seemed like a really big gamble to spend all that money and leave OL a ?. Have guys not developed as they expected or did we just make a big mistake by not addressing it further
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:31 pm to CedarGroveDog
What??? They literally spent 4 mill for the best left tackle in the country
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:33 pm to CedarGroveDog
OL should be fine. I do want to see Solomon Thomas and the ole Miss transfer OL
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:34 pm to king47
Should have known when Bordelon was named a starter there was a problem
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:35 pm to doya2
And they still dog walked Clemson and have moved the ball efficiently, even while keeping it vanilla and not revealing the secret sauce against LA Tech. It will be ok.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:38 pm to CedarGroveDog
The OL is fine. They had to prepare ofr a scheme they would only see once this season. They probably too the let's technique through it approach.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:42 pm to BrianKellysbuyout
Clemson is dog shite. They might be as bad as a middle of the pack ACC team. That may be too generous too.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:08 pm to king47
There's more than one OL position. Saying the OL is fine just because we spent alot on a LT is close to the dumbest shite ive heard in a long long time
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:11 pm to doya2
I know, I'm gonna be honest, some of these motherfrickers are fricking low IQ as frick, yeah the LT position is in great hands but on the OL your as good as your weakest link and it's obvious that LT and C are our only really solid positions.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:14 pm to GeauxLaneTrain
I forgot about him but I think if he was ready he'd be out there.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:15 pm to Rummeltigah
I think that Clemson will have a very similar season to last year and Dabo will be fired
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:20 pm to doya2
quote:
Should have known when Bordelon was named a starter there was a problem
I was WAY more concerned when I saw Weston Davis was starting at right
tackle.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:39 pm to Boudreauboudreaugoly
Borderlon earned his spot. He’s worked his arse off getting stronger and waited his turn, now it’s here. Bah was the problem last night, not Bordelon. I thought Lane would replace Bah with Harper but he’s the coach and knows way more than me.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:42 pm to CedarGroveDog
O line had issues against Clemson but Sam was able to run well enough that it was overshadowed. Got a little exposed against LAtech
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:50 pm to Rummeltigah
Maybe Tech beats Clemson
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:50 pm to CedarGroveDog
quote:
There's more than one OL position. Saying the OL is fine just because we spent alot on a LT is close to the dumbest shite ice heard in a long long time
We brought in a LT, C, two Guards, and another formerly starting tackle. Where does this narrative come from that we didn’t address the OL?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:07 pm to doya2
why is Bordelon the designated whipping boy? Honestly, I think he has played fairly well.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:12 pm to bearhc
He has. He and Seaton are going to be a really good duo once they gel in game action.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:14 pm to CedarGroveDog
quote:
I know, I'm gonna be honest, some of these motherfrickers are fricking low IQ as frick,
Thank you, for pointing yourself out.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:39 pm to CedarGroveDog
any OLine is only as good as its weakest link. Every team has one, and the better defensive teams, are good at exploiting that weakness.
I don't know how many LSU has, but RT is definitely a concern.
I don't know how many LSU has, but RT is definitely a concern.

Popular
Back to top

7








