re: Not for the Les Miles lovers

quote:

---

48-0 win streak VS non-conference opponents, mostly rent-a-wins.

---

FIFY

Yes we have, Tubbs. As I said back in the summer. Our sec record went 8-0, 6-2, 5-3, 4-4. I said we'd need a significant improvement in conference play- so far, we have. Sans the Bama game. They are just more talented right now and there's no shame in losing to them, aside from the stubborn and ill- advised game plan. I also said Harris should start, as he is the more talented qb- check. I said we needed to "compete" for the west- check. Hopefully we don't end up 4th as predicted. We won't be last as some said. I also said we need to make it to a reputable bowl game and win- to be determined. We also need a top notch recruiting class that's heavy with D linemen and lb'ers- looks promising on paper. I say Les has 3 more years. Either to get us an sec title with the Fournette class or find himself out of work, or he walks off into the sunset.

Hey RB 10:

You're an a-hole, Dude! Your avatar and quote line making fun of a player shows exactly the type of jerk you are and that you hate LSU.

Go frick yourself!

quote:

---

By pointing out that we actually threw it 23 and ran it 24?

---

Dude if you are going to post at least know what the frick you are talking about. Harris was 6/19 for 128. Who threw the other five passes? Dumbass.

quote:

---

Les is the Richt of the West. Can't get that Florida/Bama monkey off his back.

---

That's just not true. Richt hasn't gotten Georgia to the ship much less won it. He had 1 sec championship in all his years as head coach and when he loses he loses badly.

Well said

Unfortunately yes, yes it will. Though it is not his fault the o-line stunk. It will.

Is this the butthurt vicarious loser thread?

quote:

---

Dude if you are going to post at least know what the frick you are talking about. Harris was 6/19 for 128. Who threw the other five passes? Dumbass.

---

Jeez. You aren't very bright are you? "Threw it", as in had 23 passing plays called, and 24 running plays called.

We had 2 sacks. 2 pass interference penalties. 1 scramble for positive yards. 23 passing plays. 24 rushing plays. The inference was that we only "threw it" 19 times and that we didn't at least attempt to have a balanced attack. You can't get proven wrong and then try to change the narrative when you are proven a dumbass.

Eta: I think we had the one scramble for positive yards...that would put us at 24 passing plays. Either way, the point is the same.

quote:

---

He also had the rushing total wrong. Perhaps you should try to keep up. 1st grade level shite.

---

No, I did not. You see, when you drop back to pass in college football, and are sacked, it is counted as a rush. Likewise, when you drop back to pass and scramble for positive yards, it is also counted as a rush. When you deduct those totals from the "rushes", you can accurately see just how many times we ran it, and how many times we passed it (as in called passing plays with the attempt to have a balanced offense). You know, kindergarten level shite.

Haven't had the stomach to watch again but did we really run up the middle over and over?. I saw runs to the left a to the right but not the same blocking as we did against Aubie and Others wher we pulled guards and tight ends. Saw him start running side ways right off and knew it was going to be stuffed. I don't know ?. Plenty disappointed in what I thought was a great OLine. Wasn't 7 fault but whose was it?..