- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No way the lead in story for SportsCenter
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:06 am to wilceaux
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:06 am to wilceaux
quote:
Their run d is almost as good as ours.
Not even close.
Their defense as a whole is pretty shitty right now.
then why are they ranked 14th nationally in rushing defense? they only give up 15 more yards per game than we do.
1
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:19 am to BobBoucher
Take a look at the schedules..
LSU has played mostly running teams.
The creampuffs AU played had to throw the ball to stay in the game.
Ark State threw 42 times
MSU only ran 17 times
Clemson ran all over them
ULM only 11 runs
UK 20 runs
Only real games where teams ran at them was Clemson,USC they failed to stop one Clemson runner who got 140 yards on them and they did good against USC.
The stats are skewed due to teams not even trying to run for the most part.
LSU has played mostly running teams.
The creampuffs AU played had to throw the ball to stay in the game.
Ark State threw 42 times
MSU only ran 17 times
Clemson ran all over them
ULM only 11 runs
UK 20 runs
Only real games where teams ran at them was Clemson,USC they failed to stop one Clemson runner who got 140 yards on them and they did good against USC.
The stats are skewed due to teams not even trying to run for the most part.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:20 am to BobBoucher
dont see shite on espn.com about the lsu starter
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:21 am to Choupique19
quote:
It is that obvious to the entire nation that Les Miles continues to start the wrong QB.
Miles says, "The two QB system is working." I say the offense would be even better with #12 getting most of the snaps.
Miles says, "#12 is comfortable coming off of the bench." I say that's a cop out. I say until you start #12 this season you don't really know if that is correct or not. What if #34 didn't start the game against McNeese, and he came in on the 3rd drive of the game and ran for 100 yards in the game. Would you say that #34 was successful because he sat out the first two drives?
good points...
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:25 am to Catman88
quote:
The creampuffs AU played had to throw the ball to stay in the game
They only give up a half yard per rush more than we do, which is still top 20 nationally, and they have one more rushing attempt against them than we do.
everything looks equal aside from their opponents.
their easier schedule is the only evidence to support your claim, and that they gave up 187 to clemson.
Just because they are good against inferior teams, doest mean they will be bad against good teams.
This post was edited on 10/14/10 at 11:31 am
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:36 am to DeafVallyBatnR
Agreed....I feel good about the situation as is. Let the kid get a couple more pressure situations in before we make the change.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:01 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
The "does well when coming off the bench" notion is the dumbest thing in all of sports, period
You are the second dumbest.Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:12 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Nah, what's hypocritical is your attack of his opinion by use of your own...as if your opinion is somehow better.
No, I have no opinion except to defer to the opinion of the experts - at least until they fail.
I didn't so much attack his opinion as much as question why I should consider it valid.
To this point I have no idea why his opinion on how Miles should run the team is more valid than Miles' opinion.
Poster says, "that's how I think it should be"
I reply, "why is how you think it should be more valid than how Coach thinks it should be?"
Poster, "Move to China."
Me, "frick you."
You, "Yeah, move to China."
Me, "frick you too."
Clear yet?
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:13 pm to Choupique19
None of yall know anything. I trust miles and his 6-0 record. I never though lee was comfortable as a starter. He has never proven that. But he is good in pressure situations and leading the 2 minute drill. I think the coaching staff should have been playing him more, but not much more. They are slowly bringing him along and building his confidnce. The coaching staff is doingthe rt thing. Don't forgot our same amazing fans tried to run lee out of town.
I want to see him start this game to see if he has it. But I onow what happened last time he started. He went 7-22. Most games that jl shined in and we won he was not the starter.
I want to see him start this game to see if he has it. But I onow what happened last time he started. He went 7-22. Most games that jl shined in and we won he was not the starter.
This post was edited on 10/14/10 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:21 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
No, I have no opinion except to defer to the opinion of the experts - at least until they fail.
I didn't so much attack his opinion as much as question why I should consider it valid.
To this point I have no idea why his opinion on how Miles should run the team is more valid than Miles' opinion.
Poster says, "that's how I think it should be"
I reply, "Yeah?
And what's YOUR coaching record??"
Poster, "Im free to post my opinion on a forum. if you dont like it, move to China."
Me, "frick you."
You, "Yeah, move to China."
Me, "frick you too."
Clear yet?
FIFY
Good luck trying to defend Miles to every poster who thinks he should do something differently.
I bet if i searched the archives, i could probably find instances where youvw stated you would like to see him do something different as well.
so, unless youve agreed 100% with 100% of everything Miles has ever said or done, you need to
This post was edited on 10/14/10 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:28 pm to dgnx6
quote:
I never though lee was comfortable as a starter. He has never proven that.
quote:
But I onow what happened last time he started. He went 7-22.
its been a year dude...some people actually grow in a year...(we all know JJ hasnt but that doesnt mean Jlee hasnt either)
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:29 pm to TigerFan55555
I would love to know how the 2 qb system is "working". Cause I see one guy who produces, and one guy who doesnt.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:32 pm to Sal Minella
quote:
If LSU is a 2 QB team, I don't understand the hysteria over who starts. I'm more concerned in who's finishing which in the last 2 games has been Lee.
And we've had to come from behind in both games on the last drive
I think that's what frustrates people. Maybe we wouldn't be playing catch up if we had the best QB on the field for the entire game.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:33 pm to bbap
quote:
I would love to know how the 2 qb system is "working". Cause I see one guy who produces, and one guy who doesnt.
my god, even the opposing teams fans know what the hell is going....
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:34 pm to Powerman
quote:
I think that's what frustrates people. Maybe we wouldn't be playing catch up if we had the best QB on the field for the entire game.
ding ding ding....we have a winner Bobby!...
Posted on 10/14/10 at 1:10 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
I think that's what frustrates people. Maybe we wouldn't be playing catch up if we had the best QB on the field for the entire game.
+10e100000<---exponent
Posted on 10/14/10 at 1:19 pm to MoreOrLes
have any of your ranters broke the stats down for last two games?
what were the running game numbers with JL on the field? carries/yds/avg etc
what are they with JJ?
My thought is if you put JL on the field TOO much, the running game will disappear. This TEAMS best chance of winning week to week is....run the ball alot, let the defense/special teams win field position, make big plays in the pass game when needed.
so I got no issue with JJ starting and JL coming off the bench for 2-3 series a half as needed. Isn't the goal to win the game? Or is it to gain as many yards as possible? just saying
what were the running game numbers with JL on the field? carries/yds/avg etc
what are they with JJ?
My thought is if you put JL on the field TOO much, the running game will disappear. This TEAMS best chance of winning week to week is....run the ball alot, let the defense/special teams win field position, make big plays in the pass game when needed.
so I got no issue with JJ starting and JL coming off the bench for 2-3 series a half as needed. Isn't the goal to win the game? Or is it to gain as many yards as possible? just saying
Posted on 10/14/10 at 1:21 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
Isn't the goal to win the game?
The goal is to win the game and not wait till the last second to do it, saving your fans from high blood pressure and heart stress.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 1:25 pm to Powerman
would anyone be complaining if lee did play against mcneese?
i can imagine someone starting a thread about playing our best qb and risking injury against a team like mcneese.
i can imagine someone starting a thread about playing our best qb and risking injury against a team like mcneese.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 1:28 pm to liquid rabbit
quote:
not wait till the last second to do it, saving your fans from high blood pressure and heart stress
Is that listed on the Team Goals sign?
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News