- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/17/13 at 4:44 pm to biglego
If we had Bama's schedule then I would be all in on the national title hype.
10-2
10-2
Posted on 8/17/13 at 4:49 pm to siliconvalleytiger
2006
/thread
/thread
Posted on 8/17/13 at 4:51 pm to siliconvalleytiger
i was pumped about 2011. Odd year, game in the dome, sr qbs. It was actually the perfect storm regarding our last 2 bcs titles. After we creamed wvu i knew we were going undefeated.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 5:18 pm to siliconvalleytiger
White, Jefferson, beckwith, bower will provide immediate impact.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 5:20 pm to The Boat
quote:
Notre Dame's schedule is pretty tough. Take off the glasses.
Don't know if you're being sarcastic or not but they definetly have a pretty tough schedule.
Michigan had a pretty good defense last year an the offense should be explosive this year. IMO they are the equivalent of Ole Miss, with the potential of an UGA
Michigan State would beat the bottom 6 of our conference.
Oklahoma would beat the bottom half of our conference
Arizona St could beat Everybody not named Alabama TAMU, LSU
USC is Vandy and actually they have the same strengths and weaknesses
Then they have Stanford, who would be #3 if they played in the SEC.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 5:28 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
The last time I felt nearly this good was before the 07 season
I actually feel the same way.
Not in the slightest bit worried about the D. While our corners may be young they've had a decent amount of playing time to get experience. I think Chavis will trust the CBs man-on-man, which will allow us to blitz more. Plus, I think the fact that we will actually have a passing game will suddenly make our offense much more productive. We are going to be a monster...
Posted on 8/17/13 at 5:53 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:Whoa boy, settle down. Definitely couldn't beat UGA, USCe, and UF.
Arizona St could beat Everybody not named Alabama TAMU, LSU
I agree with the 10-2'ers b/c it would still be a good year, but I also think games like Ole Miss go from a ? to a blowout if your team is consistent. If we beat UGA, seems like 11-1 but that's a tough match-up, and at this point you'd be wise to chalk up any away game against the Big 6 as an L. I think we beat A&M regardless of JFF, and UF at home seems manageable. Bama is a straight push, so, I can see the optimism.
I worried about the loss of personnel on D after the Draft, but every position besides DE is so stacked with returning play-makers it's foolish to assume we won't have one of the better defenses in the country again.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 5:58 pm to Tiger Ryno
Idiot gonna idiot.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 6:23 pm to siliconvalleytiger
I completely agree with this, we sure do have a lot of stupid fricks that consider themselves fans.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 6:24 pm to madddoggydawg
quote:
Whoa boy, settle down. Definitely couldn't beat UGA, USCe, and UF.
ASU's offense is loaded and the D is pretty good.
They'd challenge UGA, USCe, and UF and could beat them. They'd have no chance with LSU and Bama though.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 6:34 pm to Datbayoubengal
You overvalue a lot of teams bud
And what makes anyone think the D will get "lit" up. That makes no sense to me. If our D wouldn't have been so solid we'd have a new head coach by now.
This D is loaded with talent.
And what makes anyone think the D will get "lit" up. That makes no sense to me. If our D wouldn't have been so solid we'd have a new head coach by now.
This D is loaded with talent.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 6:35 pm to siliconvalleytiger
I agree. Even with a young defense I really believe our offense is going to be able to score at will.
WE ARE GOING TO SIMPLY OUTSCORE EVERY OPPONENT WE FACE THIS YEAR.
WE ARE GOING TO SIMPLY OUTSCORE EVERY OPPONENT WE FACE THIS YEAR.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 6:37 pm to siliconvalleytiger
I kinda started feeling the same way about a month ago, but I'm not gonna tell anybody yet.. 
n e
n e
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 8/17/13 at 7:00 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:Is this your Pac-12 sleeper? I'm not gonna pretend I know much about them, but I think they'd shock the world if they finish ahead of Oregon or Stanford, and I still think anyone in the Big 6 could beat either of those two more times than not. I'm not saying it has no chance of happening, but isn't OSU, UCLA, Zona and USC in just as good a position to finish 3rd?
ASU's offense is loaded and the D is pretty good.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 11:18 pm to madddoggydawg
I think it comes down to quarterback play.That's assuming the offensive play calling improves from the second half debacle of the chicken bowl.I have every confidence in the Tiger's defense. I'm having some reluctance buying into Zak's maturity.But then that's why we play the games. 
Posted on 8/17/13 at 11:31 pm to tigerlore
I really like the flying under the radar thing LSU has going for it this year.
There is no better motivation for a team than to go out and prove the doubters wrong.
There is no better motivation for a team than to go out and prove the doubters wrong.
Posted on 8/18/13 at 12:45 am to tiger4178
I'm very optimistic about the offense, however I'm in a show me state of mind. Been promised a great offense for years and have to see it to believe it.
If offense can control T.O.P, I'm not worried about the defense. Sure we are young but they can play. The key is that lsu can not make the D stay on the field as long as they have had to the past few years. The depth isn't there this year to do that.
I'm happy with 10-2 because the schedule is tough, but if the offense gets on a roll 11-1 would be awesome.
If offense can control T.O.P, I'm not worried about the defense. Sure we are young but they can play. The key is that lsu can not make the D stay on the field as long as they have had to the past few years. The depth isn't there this year to do that.
I'm happy with 10-2 because the schedule is tough, but if the offense gets on a roll 11-1 would be awesome.
This post was edited on 8/18/13 at 12:47 am
Posted on 8/18/13 at 8:08 am to PoppaD
Gonna say 10-2 with losing to bama and uga. We have one win at uga since 97, although I understand les has won there already. Bama will have the team set by the time we play them, so that will be tough. We could beat them and drop another one, but just think road games will be tough and those two are the toughest.
Posted on 8/18/13 at 9:25 am to enufodis
quote:
I agree. Even with a young defense I really believe our offense is going to be able to score at will.
WE ARE GOING TO SIMPLY OUTSCORE EVERY OPPONENT WE FACE THIS YEAR.
This. This. This.
When you have a good offense you don't need a good defense. QBs are always much better their 2nd year than the 1st. We will have a passing attack along with the running, and no one will be able to stop us, including Alabama.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News