- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NCAA Regional Scoreboard Thread...Day 2..link to Live Scores inside...
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:41 pm to eyedoc
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:41 pm to eyedoc
Oregon in trouble. I dont really care about them one way or the other but that sucks to see a bad call potentially end their season.
I know it is more than just that one call, but still.
I know it is more than just that one call, but still.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:44 pm to kciDAtaE
It wasn't a bad call.
Dude ran over the catcher, which has been illegal in college baseball well before MLB changed the rule after the Buster Posey injury.
I think it's dumb to suspend the guy for the next game, but by the letter of the rule, it was the correct call for him to be out.
Dude ran over the catcher, which has been illegal in college baseball well before MLB changed the rule after the Buster Posey injury.
I think it's dumb to suspend the guy for the next game, but by the letter of the rule, it was the correct call for him to be out.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:48 pm to Broski
Cal Poly 9, Oregon 8 top 8
I think the announcer just said Oregon has five home runs.
I think the announcer just said Oregon has five home runs.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:48 pm to Broski
My understanding is the catcher blocked the plate. I do agree the runner ran over the catcher. Should have just slid and there wouldn’t be an issue.
In my mind, run counts bc blocking the plate but fair to eject the runner due to the collision.
I don’t know enough about the rules to say if that is even a possibility to rule that. But that seems fair to me.
In my mind, run counts bc blocking the plate but fair to eject the runner due to the collision.
I don’t know enough about the rules to say if that is even a possibility to rule that. But that seems fair to me.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:50 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
My understanding is the catcher blocked the plate
Catcher has a right to catch the ball and the throw took him to that spot.
quote:
In my mind, run counts bc blocking the plate but fair to eject the runner due to the collision.
The whole point of the rule being in place is to discourage collisions at the plate, granting a run doesn't do that.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:52 pm to Broski
Lot of folks thought Kansas would make some noise in the tourney. 2 and que.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:54 pm to Broski
Yeah I can see that. Again, I don’t know enough about the rules to say one or the other. I didn’t realize the catcher could block the plate in some circumstances like a poor throw.
But I have a question. Let’s say catcher was blocking the plate. But the runner still barrels him over. They both “broke” the rules. Is it bc the catcher broke the rule first, the runner is allowed to run him over? Or is runner still expected to slide? Does one trump the other? …I guess that’s 3 questions.
But I have a question. Let’s say catcher was blocking the plate. But the runner still barrels him over. They both “broke” the rules. Is it bc the catcher broke the rule first, the runner is allowed to run him over? Or is runner still expected to slide? Does one trump the other? …I guess that’s 3 questions.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:56 pm to kciDAtaE
In that scenario, if the umpires deem that the catcher intentionally blocked the plate, then he's at fault and the run is granted.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:57 pm to Chicken
Predicted 7-1 last night, and was close. 6-4 tigers tonight.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:58 pm to Broski
But does the runner get disciplined? Can he still be ejected for collision? Or does runner get to do whatever he wants if catcher blocks plate?
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:58 pm to slutiger5
What we're learning from these elimination games today is that a lot of these teams are not deep in pitching at all.
A lot of runs across the country this morning and afternoon.
A lot of runs across the country this morning and afternoon.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 4:59 pm to slutiger5
Cal Poly solo shot, now up 10-8
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:00 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
But does the runner get disciplined? Can he still be ejected for collision? Or does runner get to do whatever he wants if catcher blocks plate?
No idea, but I would assume there would be no discipline as it would be viewed that the catcher was the one that initiated the contact.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:00 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:if I recall, I think the umps are supposed to discern if the runner colliding was malicious. Which makes the call last night so much worse. Not sure if that's true.
But does the runner get disciplined? Can he still be ejected for collision? Or does runner get to do whatever he wants if catcher blocks plate?
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:02 pm to hashtag
Yeah. I’m wondering if they could say, run counts but runner ejected for contact. And then play on.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:06 pm to kciDAtaE
Clemson RHP is 9-1.
About to start vs W Virginia.
Hits the first batter. Already chippy.
About to start vs W Virginia.
Hits the first batter. Already chippy.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:07 pm to Chicken
Oregon got all that cash and no talent........
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:09 pm to Mr Clean
#12 Oregon has been eliminated
Posted on 5/31/25 at 5:11 pm to Broski
quote:
What we're learning from these elimination games today is that a lot of these teams are not deep in pitching at all.
No team is deep in pitching.
Been trying to tell all the bitches all year that cry we don’t have 15 lockdowns in the pen.
Popular
Back to top
