- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ncaa proposed rule change for no huddle
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:47 pm to TigerBait1127
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:47 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
the player was ejected for grazing the helmet of the QB.
Well the rule shouldn't exist in the 1st place. If the rule has to exist, it should have to be malicious and egregious. Right now, a matter of inches results in ejection
They could do that, but then you have to worry about how malicious and egregious is going to be defined.
Easiest thing would be to review and suspend on Monday if someone needs suspending and pull replay out of it.
0
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:49 pm to 62zip
quote:
Not really, the play clock starts when the ball becomes dead on the previous down generally speaking.
Doesn't matter. His point was the game clock would be stopped on an incomplete pass, which has NO bearing on the play clock. The play clock would start at the same time either way.
And NO to your point the play clock starts immediately at the end of the previous play Are you serious? It starts when the ball is spotted at the line of scrimmage
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:52 pm to GeeOH
quote:
And NO to your point the play clock starts immediately at the end of the previous play Are you serious? It starts when the ball is spotted at the line of scrimmage
That's incorrect. With the introduction of the 40 second play clock the play clock now starts, in most instances when the ball is declared dead on the previous down.
Are YOU serious?
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:02 pm to 62zip
quote:
And NO to your point the play clock starts immediately at the end of the previous play Are you serious? It starts when the ball is spotted at the line of scrimmage
hahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahhahahahahahahahahahah
Also what about spiking the ball outside of the 2 minute windows spoken about in the article? Has this been discussed?
ETA ahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahaha and
be more wrong next timeThis post was edited on 2/13/14 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:05 pm to GeeOH
quote:
And NO to your point the play clock starts immediately at the end of the previous play Are you serious? It starts when the ball is spotted at the line of scrimmage
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:13 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
Saban doing work.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:16 pm to PacWilly
quote:
Because of the increase number of plays (generally), the defense should be able to substitute if they want to regardless of what the offense does.
It's called a timeout.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:30 pm to Will2nd
Just discussed this on van pelt with sumlin
It's complete bullshite
bielema and saban are pushing this new rule and it doesn't make any sense at all.
It's complete bullshite
bielema and saban are pushing this new rule and it doesn't make any sense at all.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:35 pm to HeavyCore
That's terrible, it's 3rd and inches, you can't hurry back to the line and do a quick sneak.....?
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:38 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
What if they just made a rule that said a team can not run more than three plays in a row without a huddle? That should not affect a HUNH offense too much and it gives a defense time to switch packages.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:40 pm to josh336
incomplete pass?
penalty
out of bounds?
measurement?
regardless. his comment was talking about the GAME clock being stopped. I stand corrected about certain instances. I said the play clock isn't effected.
penalty
out of bounds?
measurement?
regardless. his comment was talking about the GAME clock being stopped. I stand corrected about certain instances. I said the play clock isn't effected.
This post was edited on 2/13/14 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:46 pm to GeeOH
Anyone who wants to change this into a rule is a damn fool. Did we outlaw the slot receiver when they started becoming effective? How about the pass catching tight end? Or kicking with a holder? Or hell even the forward pass? This is such a knee jerk reaction
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:47 pm to SteveLSU35
The whole thing just makes no sense. What's the point of having a 40 second playclock? Why not just have a 30 second playclock and just have the ref stand over the ball for 10 seconds between play?
So basically this helps teams that want to shorten the game and use as much time as possible, but penalize teams that want to run as many plays as possible. Why should a new rule be put in place to benefit one style of play?
Let's say you are line up quickly and a defender jumps across the line before 30 seconds on the clock, are you not allowed to snap the ball to catch him offsides?
So basically this helps teams that want to shorten the game and use as much time as possible, but penalize teams that want to run as many plays as possible. Why should a new rule be put in place to benefit one style of play?
Let's say you are line up quickly and a defender jumps across the line before 30 seconds on the clock, are you not allowed to snap the ball to catch him offsides?
Posted on 2/13/14 at 1:51 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
The whole thing just makes no sense. What's the point of having a 40 second playclock? Why not just have a 30 second playclock and just have the ref stand over the ball for 10 seconds between play?
That's basically what you had with the 25 second clock.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:21 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
The targeting rule was a mistake from the beginning, should not have been introduced. I'm glad they're backing away from it. Hopefully, within a couple of seasons it'll be abolished completely.
As for defensive substitutions and the HUNH... in the context of college football only, I think this new rule goes a little too far; it weakens a viable tactic. But in the big picture, I see this change as college football going in the opposite direction as Roger Goodell's piss-poor excuse for a football organization, so it's probably a good thing.
As for defensive substitutions and the HUNH... in the context of college football only, I think this new rule goes a little too far; it weakens a viable tactic. But in the big picture, I see this change as college football going in the opposite direction as Roger Goodell's piss-poor excuse for a football organization, so it's probably a good thing.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:28 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
terrible rule, no way that should be happening
This post was edited on 2/13/14 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:32 pm to sunnydaze
Hugh Freeze is 6-10 in SEC would think he would want any changes in rules he can get, what he is doing aint working, 7-6.....lol
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:35 pm to LuzianaFootball
quote:
quote:
So what's the point of the rule then?
Exactly. Defenses have to get their conditioning up and coaches have to coach and manage the game better.
It would also help with replay. I am sure that often teams rush to the line before it is determined if a play should be reviewed.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:42 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
it's only 11 seconds
Ask Auburn if 11 seconds made a difference.
Posted on 2/13/14 at 3:26 pm to Will Cover
I wonder if anyone proposing this rule remembers that there was a day when if you took a player out of the game he could only return once during that quarter. This meant that most players played both ways. Billy Cannon had to make the defensive stop (with starting QB Warren Rabb) to make his Halloween Run stand.
The advocates of the rule also claim that more injuries will come from the HUNH. But they can't prove it.
Saban and Bielema come off as whiners in this whole thing. You have to like that you never hear Miles complain about it. And his record against HUNH offenses is really good.
GEAUX TIGERS
The advocates of the rule also claim that more injuries will come from the HUNH. But they can't prove it.
Saban and Bielema come off as whiners in this whole thing. You have to like that you never hear Miles complain about it. And his record against HUNH offenses is really good.
GEAUX TIGERS
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News