Started By
Message

re: Name Recognition vs. Napier

Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:55 am to
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:55 am to
Woody isn’t hiring ULL’s coach
Posted by BadatBourre
Member since Jan 2019
997 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:07 am to
Can we stop with the Napier talk? He beat Nicholls by 3. Georgia Southern by 8. He has 1 "quality win" which is Iowa State. They got stomped by UT. This isn't our coach of the future.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17000 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:11 am to
James Franklin is a much better choice than Napier or Kiffin
Posted by MikeHoncho47
Member since Aug 2016
1781 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Ummmm Dabo fired him.


Dabo fired him because Dabo was about to be fired.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
4528 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:17 am to
For me it would be Napier (or some other up and comer) with an incentive-laden contract.

I don’t see any big time coach coming here and living up to expectations.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61255 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Honestly the only thing I hold against Napier is that he hasn't done it at a power 5 school.


Of course you’d rather have him be more proven at the P5 level, but I just think with salaries where they are, it’s gonna be hard to throw so much extra cash at the few “sure things” to get them to move. Because the “sure things” are already making a ton of money at places where they are obviously, currently winning.

Football isn’t like baseball where the salaries are low enough you can double a guy like Jay Johnson’s salary and give his assistants a $100,000+ per raise. Let’s say Woodward goes after Dabo. He’d have to offer him something like $15 million/year for 10 years to get him to even pick up the phone. That’s 50% more than what he gave Jimbo and everybody laughs at that now (I personally don’t). And Jimbo is an expert on one side of the ball, unlike Dabo, which most of our fans seem to want as a prerequisite.

Speaking of Jimbo, he’s a proven winner, friends of Woodward, and would probably leave A&M for LSU. He’d be a “safe” hire. But boring as frick and with a very limited ceiling. I would MUCH rather take the calculated risk of a Napier or Aranda who at least have the chance of being actual home runs over the long haul rather than merely seeming like home runs (to some) at the press conference, but wind up producing uninspiring results.
Posted by GEAUX5
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5145 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:23 am to
You don’t need to pay Napier some ridiculous amount of money either… can get him for cheap. Like another poster said, the program building he’s done at ULL is the most impressive.

People love him in Lafayette.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7882 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:25 am to
quote:

You don’t need to pay Napier some ridiculous amount of money either… can get him for cheap.


Same logic was used when arguing for O.

You get what you pay for
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7882 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:26 am to
quote:

People love him in Lafayette


Another thing that should never be considered when evaluating the future coach of LSU or any major program.

The people loved O in South Lafourche. Doesn't mean he is the right man for the job
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4532 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Convince me Napier doesn’t have the most potential upside + least potential downside of any remotely realistic name dropped to date.


Napier and Fleck, IMO, are the two great risk reward names out there. Both have proven to be high integrity individuals with the ability to build programs. The job Napier has done at UL with the limited resources and talent on that roster is almost a fricking miracle. Fleck has done similar things at Minnesota and turned a dude who wouldn’t have even been considered an NFL prospect into a lock to be drafted, possibly on day one, at QB. Fickell is a similar story. Those are the guys I want. The ones who have that upward trajectory and have built programs from nothing and limited talent. No the James Franklins of the world, not some dude coming out of retirement, and not some big personality that’s in their 4th stop as a HC. Gime the humble, hungry, program building mfer that can build this program into a dynasty that rivals Saban and Dabo.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 8:45 am
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61255 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:42 am to
quote:

James Franklin is a much better choice than Napier or Kiffin


Well sure he is. But discounting our Title IX issues and his involvement with covering up (or looking the way) regarding rape at Vanderbilt, he was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in Pennsylvania, went to college in Pennsylvania, has a wife and 2 daughters that have now been a part of the Happy Valley, Pennsylvania community for 8 years now, and he has Pennsylvania State University undefeated and ranked #4 in the country.

He makes $5.5 million a year, which PSU would surely raise by a couple million if they got in a bidding war for his services. How much money do you think we’d have to offer him for him to take this job and do you think that figure is realistic? You win a National Championship at Penn State and they will let you stay for 40 years coaching in diapers from the booth in your 80s, build a statue for you, and vehemently defend you for turning a blind eye to pedophilia right under your nose for 3 decades. We’re about to fire our coach less than 2 years removed from not just a national championship, but probably the greatest season in the history of college football.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61255 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:53 am to
quote:

You don’t need to pay Napier some ridiculous amount of money either… can get him for cheap.


Same logic was used when arguing for O.

You get what you pay for



I certainly understand what you’re saying, but like I mentioned earlier, with salaries being as high as they currently are, somebody not making a ton makes them much more attainable. It’s not about going cheap, it’s about actually convincing them to move.
Posted by GEAUX5
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5145 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Another thing that should never be considered when evaluating the future coach of LSU or any major program.

The people loved O in South Lafourche. Doesn't mean he is the right man for the job


Man, I didn’t say that in the way that he’s “one of us”. I’m saying that people in Lafayette have gravitated towards the culture he’s built. They respect him.

No one respects Shrimp boat.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
4913 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:02 am to
quote:

I would MUCH rather take the calculated risk of a Napier or Aranda who at least have the chance of being actual home runs over the long haul rather than merely seeming like home runs (to some) at the press conference, but wind up producing uninspiring results.

Carl gets it
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
38425 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Find a metric other than... so & so had a good year at a school I know goes to big bowls sometimes.


Not sure LSU has really done that much. Definitely not with O. Not really with Miles or Saban.

Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
4913 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:03 am to
quote:

The people loved O in South Lafourche.

And his recruiting is just fine. You cherry picked ONE of Napier’s upsides to dismiss.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7518 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:11 am to
Napier will build the program the right way.

My only concern as a UL fan is his in-game coaching. He's not that good. And I'd dare to say is border line bad.

But that can be fixed.
Posted by Bring Da Wood
Texas
Member since Dec 2006
1951 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:12 am to
If we hire Napier it would be a fail. Lots of more proven coaches to go after. I mean could you see the media? LSU goes over to little ULL and pulls their coach. Nobody else wanted the job. They would laugh their arses off at us. Hell, I’d take Fleck over Napier all day.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
17714 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:12 am to
Napier is a safe hire with no baggage that could also come at a better price.
I think Napier wants it too. He did not jump at South Carolina or Auburn last year and I feel it’s because he knew O’s days were numbered.
Posted by ForLSU56
Rapides Parish
Member since Feb 2015
5582 posts
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Look at the two coordinators we have this year. Neither have been a coordinator and Ed hires them


Shame of it is, you have to assume that both have aspirations of moving up the ranks and being a head coach one day. Both I'm sure are very football smart, know the game and are "good" coaches, just haven't been thru the fire of calling plays and making adjustments.

Now, this dark cloud will follow them for years and probably hold them back until the ugly smell of Ed O wears off.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram