
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Motivation of SEC to keep the Federal Case open
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:20 am
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:20 am
No particular order
1.) handicap Football and Basketball recruiting. Let the threat of penalties and suspensions linger for as long as possible
2.) leverage for the College Athletic bill in the House. Case dropped if I get your vote
3.) Payback for perceived tampering in the Kiffin and Wade hires
4.) Payback for Sankey’s embarrassing testimony
As an earlier post highlighted - there is definitely a coordinated effort to “Cancel” LSU Athletics through the SEC’s mouthpieces.
Not sure what LSU’s leverage is, but Birmingham should not underestimate the intellect and resourcefulness of our allies.
1.) handicap Football and Basketball recruiting. Let the threat of penalties and suspensions linger for as long as possible
2.) leverage for the College Athletic bill in the House. Case dropped if I get your vote
3.) Payback for perceived tampering in the Kiffin and Wade hires
4.) Payback for Sankey’s embarrassing testimony
As an earlier post highlighted - there is definitely a coordinated effort to “Cancel” LSU Athletics through the SEC’s mouthpieces.
Not sure what LSU’s leverage is, but Birmingham should not underestimate the intellect and resourcefulness of our allies.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:25 am to Soft_Parade
quote:
leverage for the College Athletic bill in the House. Case dropped if I get your vote
I get that. But pissing off Johnson and Kennedy may make this a bad play.
I need to figure out who is blocking it. That may tell us something.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:28 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
I need to figure out who is blocking it. That may tell us something.
That bill prob won’t pass. The NAACP is heavily against it and I don’t see any dem senator going against that group. Corey Booker was going off on it the other day.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:31 am to Soft_Parade
Keep check on WW trying to bring pros
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:33 am to Soft_Parade
#4 should be ranked higher
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:35 am to JudgeHolden
I would block it if I were in congress. Are you kidding me? If you think the NCAA created a mess, wait until you see what 435 jack wagons decide is "best" for college sports.
This is not and should never be an issue for the federal government. It's bad enough that the courts are involved.
This is not and should never be an issue for the federal government. It's bad enough that the courts are involved.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:36 am to Soft_Parade
quote:
No particular order
1.) handicap Football and Basketball recruiting. Let the threat of penalties and suspensions linger for as long as possible
2.) leverage for the College Athletic bill in the House. Case dropped if I get your vote
3.) Payback for perceived tampering in the Kiffin and Wade hires
4.) Payback for Sankey’s embarrassing testimony
Somebody else posted this point back in the middle of the fight but it is a real chance that the SEC is not liking LSU's financial move regarding private equity. I am not sure I am either but I can believe that this is a cloaked attempt to restrict what LSU does on this front. This is waaaaayy deeper than roster management issues.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:52 am to GetmorewithLes
Good point, but I didn’t think LSU was alone or first out with that model…but as you highlight, most things in life come down to money.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:53 am to Soft_Parade
1) Sankey is a certified bitch
Posted on 9/26/26 at 8:59 am to Soft_Parade
I'm not sure the SEC has much leverage at all. One of our biggest allies is TWO HEARTBEATS from assuming the presidency. I'm fully aware that Johnson has dozens of more pressing matters than LSU's situation, but I'm sure he has staffers (possibly even provided by LSU) that can work on this, then he can rubber stamp it if/when needed.
I am leaning towards believing that LSU (supposedly currently negotiating with the SEC to settle this mess), is allowing the SEC to puff out it's chest a little bit as a face saving measure that ends with nothing of significance being done to LSU.
There is ZERO CHANCE the conference (unless Sankey/SEC are stupid), want Johnson, Kennedy or Landry unloading both barrels of what can be done to the league, particularly in discovery/congressional hearings. That's one of the reasons that expelling LSU wasn't happening from the start. Along with the Mickey Mouse influence as well.
Also, I think Wade's level of confidence "we'll see how this plays out" on the Luis eligibility matter, is where it is because pressure is being put on the NCAA/SEC behind the scenes for a favorable Luis ruling. Mainly, don't make a rule that interferes with Luis playing at LSU, if it's ultimately decided he can by the courts.
BTW, it doesn't appear that the NCAA (though they have filed counter suits) is in the business of making rules that go against established court rulings. The SEC (fear/hatred of LSU among its members) has up to this point been in that business.
I think our administration/slash political allies are DONE with the selective enforcement directed at LSU while other schools play QBs in their 6th year (SEC didn't fight that ruling), and the Bama GLeague dude from last year with Bama not being threatened by the league after that situation.
I'm just trying to read between the lines. I don't think I'm far off base with the above.
I am leaning towards believing that LSU (supposedly currently negotiating with the SEC to settle this mess), is allowing the SEC to puff out it's chest a little bit as a face saving measure that ends with nothing of significance being done to LSU.
There is ZERO CHANCE the conference (unless Sankey/SEC are stupid), want Johnson, Kennedy or Landry unloading both barrels of what can be done to the league, particularly in discovery/congressional hearings. That's one of the reasons that expelling LSU wasn't happening from the start. Along with the Mickey Mouse influence as well.
Also, I think Wade's level of confidence "we'll see how this plays out" on the Luis eligibility matter, is where it is because pressure is being put on the NCAA/SEC behind the scenes for a favorable Luis ruling. Mainly, don't make a rule that interferes with Luis playing at LSU, if it's ultimately decided he can by the courts.
BTW, it doesn't appear that the NCAA (though they have filed counter suits) is in the business of making rules that go against established court rulings. The SEC (fear/hatred of LSU among its members) has up to this point been in that business.
I think our administration/slash political allies are DONE with the selective enforcement directed at LSU while other schools play QBs in their 6th year (SEC didn't fight that ruling), and the Bama GLeague dude from last year with Bama not being threatened by the league after that situation.
I'm just trying to read between the lines. I don't think I'm far off base with the above.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:04 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
I get that. But pissing off Johnson and Kennedy may make this a bad play
Republicans are hot and heavy trying to replace (edit: was thinking of Cassidy), so striking now is the best time.
Both Texas and A&M are against the Bill that their own Senator filed (Cruz). They better be careful. It’s a fine line to be for or against something, but in the end, don’t piss off the ones in favor if the Bill happens to pass. Losing a seat at the table is far and away the worst thing to happen.
Edit: I had my Senators crossed up. Not Kennedy but Cassidy.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:05 am to tigahlovah
I’m tired of LSU and the state being drug through the mud for doing nothing more than what every other coach in the league is doing.
If LSU can’t or won’t counter sue the SEC then the state/AG needs to fill that role and quit fricking around with this shite. It’s damaging to the LSU brand and that’s exactly what these other schools in the league are trying to do.
If LSU can’t or won’t counter sue the SEC then the state/AG needs to fill that role and quit fricking around with this shite. It’s damaging to the LSU brand and that’s exactly what these other schools in the league are trying to do.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:06 am to Soft_Parade
The motivation is that dellinger has been irrelevant for a few weeks so he needed another story to drum up business the Friday before another game
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:09 am to Soft_Parade
quote:
2.) leverage for the College Athletic bill in the House. Case dropped if I get your vote
This should be the only one. The Billionaire Booster meeting showed the SEC that we don’t need them to progress forward with funding. The SEC needs everyone toeing the line. We ain’t toeing jack if we’ve secured our funding.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 9:11 am
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:09 am to JudgeHolden
If you read the bill, I sure wish it were harsher....not much will change, IMO.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:10 am to ChiefCornerstone
quote:
Republicans are hot and heavy trying to replace Kennedy,
How so? Curious as to what is pointing to this.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 9:14 am
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:18 am to CaliTiger83
Kennedy is a gem. GOP isn't trying to replace him. Are you kidding?
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:24 am to Soft_Parade
We have 2 coaches that don’t give a flying frick what anyone says. One that was technically removed from LSU once and we had the audacity to hire back. Kiffin snubs his nose at anything he can get away with and pushes “rules” to the limit. He’s snarky and the ultimate troll. They got embarrassed on the national stage and are trying to be king of the playground again.
They still look foolish & petty. I don’t think this is having the effect they think it is. And from a legal standpoint they don’t have a leg to stand on. IDK who is advising them but they need to be fired. That being said, they can, and likely will, continue to make our lives miserable. That is not a good thing. But I doubt they have this massive support they claim. This will eventually reach a boiling point from which there may be no coming back.
A glorious resolution would be Sankey removed after the season is over.
At least we do have that little piss-ant governor and our powerful members of Congress. We may need them because Kiffin & Wade (and to a lesser degree Mulkey) are unapologetically themselves and I don’t see that changing and I love it.
They still look foolish & petty. I don’t think this is having the effect they think it is. And from a legal standpoint they don’t have a leg to stand on. IDK who is advising them but they need to be fired. That being said, they can, and likely will, continue to make our lives miserable. That is not a good thing. But I doubt they have this massive support they claim. This will eventually reach a boiling point from which there may be no coming back.
A glorious resolution would be Sankey removed after the season is over.
At least we do have that little piss-ant governor and our powerful members of Congress. We may need them because Kiffin & Wade (and to a lesser degree Mulkey) are unapologetically themselves and I don’t see that changing and I love it.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:51 am to 4evrlsu
At some point, though, the SEC will have to shite or get off the pot in regards to the Fed case finding. The case was filed regarding the rostering of two football players, not basketball players. The SEC has not made a single public statement regarding any basketball players. While the official filing is about enforcement of its bylaws, it’s obvious it was in reaction to the LA district court ruling.
The SEC’s case has to overcome a mountain of hurdles: standing, harm, venue, Anti-Injunction claims, dubious 1st Amendment claims, sports league jurisprudence.
I think part of the reason the league wants it open is because the state of Louisiana is foaming at the mouth to get Sankey back in court on contempt charges. If there’s no Federal case, there’s nothing standing in the way of that.
The SEC’s case has to overcome a mountain of hurdles: standing, harm, venue, Anti-Injunction claims, dubious 1st Amendment claims, sports league jurisprudence.
I think part of the reason the league wants it open is because the state of Louisiana is foaming at the mouth to get Sankey back in court on contempt charges. If there’s no Federal case, there’s nothing standing in the way of that.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 9:52 am
Posted on 9/26/26 at 9:55 am to tigahlovah
quote:
and the Bama GLeague dude from last year with Bama not being threatened by the league after that situation.
meanwhile tejas had a "pro" lineman on their roster THIS YEAR and not even any press coverage much less SEC saying a word. he quietly recently left the team. why is that?

Popular
Back to top

10







