Started By
Message

LSU would have a legit chance at 12 team playoff

Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:30 pm
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
5215 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:30 pm
this year. Seems crazy. Is that really a good thing for college football? The playoff needed some expanding but 12 is just too much. It waters down the product.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18136 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

The playoff needed some expanding but 12 is just too much. It waters down the product.
4 is definitely too few. I'd prefer 8 or 10, but I can live with 12.

I just don't want to see further expansion to 16 or more. That would absolutely dilute it.
Posted by BBJ
BR
Member since Apr 2012
1366 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:34 pm to
And if so would play first round at say Washington in Seattle or Ohio st , Michigan
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26738 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:37 pm to
I actually thought 6 was the perfect number, giving the top two teams byes.

But I could live with 8. Having 12 is a joke. Rarely does any team past 6 have a legit argument to make the playoffs. There are only 8 teams currently that have an argument, and a few of them could have two losses by selection Sunday.
Posted by Daniel Simpson Day
Member since Nov 2023
85 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:37 pm to
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30164 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Is that really a good thing for college football?


It would make so many more games right now relevant, wouldn't that be good for college football?
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
21053 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Is that really a good thing for college football?


Imagine LSU hosting a home playoff game with Ohio St, Notre Dame, Michigan, USC, etc coming into baton rouge. And then tell me how that's a bad thing.
Posted by KingofthePoint
Member since Feb 2009
10131 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

It would make so many more games right now relevant

It would make a lot of the games that already happened irrelevant
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30164 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

It would make a lot of the games that already happened irrelevant




Why?
Posted by Big Gorilla
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2020
5454 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

LSU hosting


That’s not how it would work. Lsu would be traveling to those schools in the first round. Later rounds would be “bowl games”.
Posted by Joehat
New Orleans West
Member since Jun 2011
962 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:55 pm to
The expanded playoffs can’t get here soon enough; no one wants to watch the opt-out weedeater bowl anymore.
Posted by Gings5
HTX
Member since Jul 2016
7966 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:56 pm to
No they really don’t. A thread should be stickied.

IT IS NOT THE TOP 12 TEAMS!!!
Posted by WestSideTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
3534 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:04 pm to
It may seem that way right now but wait until UT and OU join the SEC and then the added possibility of another conference game each year. Will not seem nearly as “watered down”.

Posted by jiffyjohnson
1226 miles from Death Valley
Member since Nov 2011
5004 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

IT IS NOT THE TOP 12 TEAMS!!!



what am i missing here?
Posted by jsmoke222000
Lake Charles
Member since Oct 2007
6209 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

what am i missing here?


The new 12-team College Football Playoff field will include the six highest-ranked conference champions, which will receive automatic bids. The top four teams will receive a first-round bye to the quarterfinals. The six highest-ranked teams remaining will round out the 12-team format.
Posted by Gings5
HTX
Member since Jul 2016
7966 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:25 pm to
It’s the power 5 conference champs, best group of 5 team, and 6 at large.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33885 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:28 pm to
If it's not a square, cube, etc of 2 it's dumb.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 7:29 pm
Posted by TIGERhype
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2014
958 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:36 pm to
If given the choice between 4 or 12, I’d take 12, any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. Transitioning to a playoff system was inevitable, but was completely asinine to do only 4 team.
Posted by jiffyjohnson
1226 miles from Death Valley
Member since Nov 2011
5004 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

jsmoke222000


quote:

Gings5


gotcha
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9307 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

It would make so many more games right now relevant, wouldn't that be good for college football?

This is my feeling on it as well. Everybody talks about CFB having “the best regular season in sports” and how the expanded playoff waters that down, but the way I see it the playoff makes more games matter. Instead of only 6-8 teams having something to play for in November, it will be 15+ teams.

It does make the games slightly less impactful for the undefeated (and to a lesser extent 1-loss) teams, but they’re still playing for first round byes, home field advantage, and conference titles.

So for me it’s not so much about how many teams have a “legitimate” claim.. it’s about what makes CFB most entertaining. If anyone still gave a shite about bowl games I might feel differently but that ship sailed whenever the 4-team playoff started.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram