- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU would beat A&M 9/10 times on a neutral field.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:33 pm to LSURep864
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:33 pm to LSURep864
LSURep864.........I have a good friend that lives close to you up in Blanchard Idaho, which is NE of Spokane right across the Idaho border, close to Spirit Lake.
How did an LSU fan wind up in Northwest Idaho?
How did an LSU fan wind up in Northwest Idaho?
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:34 pm to guttata
quote:
No way does LSU beat A&M 9 out of 10 times on a neutral field.
I would agree with this. But I do think we beat them 6-7 times out of 10 on a neutral field.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:34 pm to LSURep864
We might get the chance to see them in Atlanta.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:44 pm to SmoothBox
quote:
Explain to me how the better team loses by 15
Are you 7 years old?
South Carolina beat A&M by 24 tonight. Do you really think South Carolina is better than A&M?
LSU beat South Carolina and South Carolina beat Texas A&M, so LSU must be better than A&M, right?….nope. The transitive property doesn’t work in football.
Anyway, to summarize what I’m saying, one game does not define a team. A&M is not necessarily better than LSU and South Carolina is not necessarily better than A&M despite the outcomes of those games. You have to look at the whole season.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:45 pm to natethegreat
quote:
I sometimes think we have a tendency to think we're better than we actually are -- when in fact no one in the SEC is suffocating the conference anymore.
You are absolutely correct.
Every game we have left on the schedule will be a dogfight. This team is in no way dominant.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:48 pm to LSURep864
quote:
We were obviously the better team
I never felt that at any time in last week's game. I knew our inability to run the ball would doom last week's game, and misfiring on 3 FG attempts just amplified the misery
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:48 pm to LSURep864
quote:
LSU would beat A&M 9/10 times on a neutral field.
Serious question, would you say this same thing about Ole Miss and LSU?
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:52 pm to cbree88
LSU really needs to nut up at home vs Alabama -- stop their motile QB and run, run, run the football
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:53 pm to cbree88
Transitive property is a waste of time bro
Posted on 11/2/24 at 10:59 pm to LSURep864
You sound like an Aggie fan!!! We got beat down bc we couldn’t stop a running qb.
, no run game, and a coaching staff that had zero clue as what to do.
, no run game, and a coaching staff that had zero clue as what to do.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 11:03 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Brain Kelly is a slicker and more polished Les Miles.
LSU went into that game playing not to lose. It cost us. Kelly does this several times a year. USC, USCe, and A&M so far
Joe Sloan is Lynn Amedee. (Sloan needs to be a QB coach. He's not a top line SEC OC) .
Garrett Nussmeier is Jamie Howard.
Brad Davis is Slyvester Croom. .
Frank Wilson is Jamaluke Bamafuke (Jabbar Juluke)
Cortez Hankton is any LSU XYZ WR coach from the past 20 or so years.
Slade Nagle is Don Yankowski.
Nobody on the Offensive Staff is a great teacher of their position, except for Sloan as QB coach.
Posted on 11/3/24 at 12:03 am to sunnydaze
quote:
Transitive property is a waste of time bro
Yes. That is exactly 100% what my entire post said.
This post was edited on 11/3/24 at 12:06 am
Posted on 11/3/24 at 12:31 am to LSURep864
quote:
LSU would beat A&M 9/10 times on a neutral field.
Lol
No they wouldnt
A&M would destroy LSU
Posted on 11/3/24 at 6:07 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Yea we lost but we outhit them and out physicalled them
They went into today bruised and battered
____________
Let me help you.
They outhit us and out phsyicalled us.
They went into today bruised and battered.
They went into today bruised and battered
____________
Let me help you.
They outhit us and out phsyicalled us.
They went into today bruised and battered.
Posted on 11/3/24 at 7:03 am to LSURep864
Which LSU team shows up? 1rst half team or 2nd?
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:06 am to LSURep864
It’s unfortunate we didn’t beat them when it mattered
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:29 am to LSURep864
I will bet you $1,000 right now that we wouldn't win 9 of 10. In fact, I'll give you double odds or $2,000 if we win 90%.
Posted on 11/3/24 at 9:50 am to cbree88
quote:
A&M is not necessarily better than LSU and South Carolina is not necessarily better than A&M despite the outcomes of those games.
Why play the games then if they don’t define who is better?
Posted on 11/3/24 at 9:53 am to LSURep864
Not sure I agree with this.
Popular
Back to top


0




