- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU v. Alabama -- BCS NGC 01/09/12 @ Mercedes-Benz Superdome
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:06 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:06 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Ms. Andrews need to get her facts straight then
0
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:06 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
If Bama has Wolfe, OSU must have 5 more points than them in Harris.
But if OSU has Wolfe, OSU can have up to 51 less points than Bama.
Correct?
But if OSU has Wolfe, OSU can have up to 51 less points than Bama.
Correct?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:08 pm to tLSU
If Wolfe goes to Bama and Bama gets 3/4 of the computers, what rough percentage of Harris poll voters will need to vote OSU ahead of Bama?
If Bama gets 3/4 of the computers, is Bama essentially a lock for the NCG?
If Bama gets 3/4 of the computers, is Bama essentially a lock for the NCG?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:09 pm to Larry
quote:
For those clueless on what the harris poll is..such as I here is the Wikipedia page (not the results)
Harris Poll WIKI
I was counting on the west coast ant-sec sentiment but it seems that to many of those people are going to vote Stanford 2 to get them a BCS bowl.
If I had to guess, it's going to be Bama by the slimmest margin in BCS history
The PAC-12 voters should have either voted Stanford #2 or #4 instead of using their vote to protect Alabama from Oklahoma State.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 pm to jdg91878
Well, looks like Saban and some other corrupt coaches likely swinging this. Pathetic.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 pm to Larry
quote:
I was counting on the west coast ant-sec sentiment but it seems that to many of those people are going to vote Stanford 2 to get them a BCS bowl.
I don't understand this. Wouldn't Stanford be probably the second at large team selected behind Alabama?
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 pm to HamCandy
quote:
You know whats silly. If OU would have finished the season with one loss and won the conference this would not even be a discussion. . .
This.
What does OU have that OSU doesn't?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 pm to LSUlunatic
quote:
If Bama gets 3/4 of the computers, is Bama essentially a lock for the NCG?
Yea, but this won't happen.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:11 pm to GumboPot
quote:
What does OU have that OSU doesn't?
Pedigree
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:12 pm to Myshkin
BradEdwards_BCS Brad Edwards
If reports of Bama No. 2 in Wolfe are false, then OKST just needs to get a little closer pct-wise in the Harris than it was in the coaches'
Could Andy Staples have bad information?
If reports of Bama No. 2 in Wolfe are false, then OKST just needs to get a little closer pct-wise in the Harris than it was in the coaches'
Could Andy Staples have bad information?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:13 pm to bcsman
Anything is possible, but doubtful.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:13 pm to Myshkin
quote:quote:
If Bama gets 3/4 of the computers, is Bama essentially a lock for the NCG?
Yea, but this won't happen.
Massey
Saragin
And rumors of Wolfe
Does that complete the 3 needed for Bama, or am I missing something?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:13 pm to bcsman
You never know I guess. Might be a spoof email or something that gets by with all this nonsense going on
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:13 pm to LSUlunatic
There are 6 computers.
Highest and lowest are dropped.
Highest and lowest are dropped.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:14 pm to GumboPot
quote:
What does OU have that OSU doesn't?
TRADITION!!!!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:14 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
BradEdwards_BCS Brad Edwards
If reports of Bama No. 2 in Wolfe are false, then OKST just needs to get a little closer pct-wise in the Harris than it was in the coaches'
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:14 pm to bcsman
quote:
BradEdwards_BCS Brad Edwards
@
No reason, but giving other side just in case. RT @BamaKelli Do we have reason to believe Wolfe reports are false?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:14 pm to bcsman
Somebody needs to assume the Wolfe info is erroneous, analyze Wolfe results of recent weeks, and give us an educated guess.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:16 pm to Myshkin
quote:
There are 6 computers.
Highest and lowest are dropped.
Then can you explain why you think Bama doesn't get 3/4 of the computers?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:16 pm to Lsupimp
lsumatt has already done that in the OP and says it looks close.
Page 22 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News