- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU might get the title it should have won last three seasons
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:05 pm to bfniii
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:05 pm to bfniii
quote:
No team is going to win the NC with our schedule. Sorry!
I have a strong feeling Mett and his supporting casts would disagree with you. Hang in there, Tigers will do fine.
1
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:23 pm to TrueTigerTale
.......i agree with the schedule post. also, our defense is not strong enough to win a title. nice to have a fluid offense, but..........'defense wins championships'. the voters forgot about that when they let alabama into the 2011/2012 title game. a reminder that they won neither the conference nor the division. they didn't earn it like other teams are required to do. pure politics, money and spin !!! this sport is almost as dull as pro football; too bad that !!!
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:26 pm to floridatiger2
.......no negatigers in this camp. i'm a huge fan of les miles and the team. but this sport is all about politics now. it'll be a good year, though. always fun to watch this team.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:04 pm to uway
quote:As the article alluded to, if not for the qb situation, LSU could have and should have won.
Why should it have been us and not them? They kicked our behinds in New Orleans. Whether it was fair to be in the game really didn't matter to any objective viewer after they destroyed us in the Dome.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:08 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Doubt it, schedule is rigged against it, but will be right there with them through whatever...
The schedule favors another LSU NC with two losses.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:30 pm to uway
quote:
Whether it was fair to be in the game really didn't matter to any objective viewer after they destroyed us in the Dome.
If they didn't deserve to be in the game it doesn't matter how bad the final score looked. Suppose in 2009 if voters were allowed to vote the Vikings into the Super Bowl after New Orleans beats them by a hair. Now what if they kick our asses the second time around. Did they deserve the championship? This is not even mentioning the fact that we played an additional sec champ game while bama was at home game planning for round 2. Flatiger said it best; the post-season in college football is a farce.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 4:29 am to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
PurpleAndGold86
quote:
How do people not know how to spell his name yet?
gtfo youre a fricking d!ck lick
Who gives a flying frick if anyone spells his name right or wrong.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 4:32 am to 10888bge
quote:
Wow I am a dick
Posted on 9/19/13 at 6:51 am to CamdenTiger
Sabun n Bamuh GOING DOWN!!!!!!
Posted on 9/19/13 at 8:33 am to uway
"Whether it was fair to be in the game really didn't matter to any objective viewer after they destroyed us in the Dome."
Huh? You just made the case for how someone could objectively view it differently: the fact that LSU had to play a rematch game against it defeated on the road. We all know that Bama won the NC that year but if the question is whether LSU "should have" won it, it's not that hard to make a case.
Huh? You just made the case for how someone could objectively view it differently: the fact that LSU had to play a rematch game against it defeated on the road. We all know that Bama won the NC that year but if the question is whether LSU "should have" won it, it's not that hard to make a case.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 8:48 am to lsuoilengr
Will never understand how a team that didn't win its conference and loss to the champion of that conference at home gets an extra shot at that team. LSU deserved a shot to play someone else, instead had to play an extra game while Alabama could just sit back and scout them.
Frick that and the crackhead thugs who are SEC officials in Alabama that always rig the schedules for the Tide and against LSU. Les, Cam, Chavis and all the Tigers are about to lay a big one down on y'll asses. Get your asses ready for it!
Frick that and the crackhead thugs who are SEC officials in Alabama that always rig the schedules for the Tide and against LSU. Les, Cam, Chavis and all the Tigers are about to lay a big one down on y'll asses. Get your asses ready for it!
This post was edited on 9/19/13 at 8:50 am
Posted on 9/19/13 at 8:54 am to ATLTiger
Not saying LSU won't but I'd hold off on printing the shirts just yet. TCU is a very bad team that isn't going to win many and sure won't beat anybody with a pulse and UAB shouldn't even be qualifying as a D1 team. LSU may win all of them by 50 but being 3-0 with the schedule LSU has played so far is jumping the gun. Too early for anybody right now.
LSU has already wrote off Bama which is fine with me. Everybody is saying we beat A&M last year so we do it this year. JFF and A&M were not the same team. If you had played them later A&M had a much better chance of winning. A&M for sure would have smashed Florida. The Florida loss was ugly looking back now.
LSU has already wrote off Bama which is fine with me. Everybody is saying we beat A&M last year so we do it this year. JFF and A&M were not the same team. If you had played them later A&M had a much better chance of winning. A&M for sure would have smashed Florida. The Florida loss was ugly looking back now.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:02 am to Settingthestandard
quote:
LSU has already wrote off Bama which is fine with me. Everybody is saying we beat A&M last year so we do it this year. JFF and A&M were not the same team. If you had played them later A&M had a much better chance of winning. A&M for sure would have smashed Florida. The Florida loss was ugly looking back now.
Only an idiot would write off a&m or bama. I am equally concerned with both games. The loss to Florida last yr was damn ugly but there were some pretty terrible personnel problems due to oline injuries. I don't care how good a team looks on paper it is next to impossible to go undefeated in college football. It doesn't help that LSU has gotten shafted in terms of scheduling the last two yrs.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:09 am to TrueTigerTale
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:14 am to floridatiger2
quote:
our defense is not strong enough to win a title. nice to have a fluid offense, but..........'defense wins championships'. the voters forgot about that when they let alabama into the 2011/2012 title game. a reminder that they won neither the conference nor the division
It's true, our D is not stellar (yet) and I would not assure a perfect season. Regarding your comments about the 2012 NC game, I tend to agree it's all bureaucracy (lack of a better word) in the BCS or SEC- in having chosen Alabama. LSU should have played Ok St that year. I was very disappointed in hearing the news who LSU would play for the Nat'l. title. One thing they got right, though, is that they picked the 2 best teams in America during that time period, and that is fair enough.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:15 am to floridatiger2
Defense isn't good enough, IMO.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:15 am to BRAVEFART
Re: 2011. I've always wondered... if LSU had lost the regular season game to Alabama 9-6 in overtime, had a great seson that ended with LSU clearly and obviously ranked #2, would LSU fans be saying... "...nope, we didn't deserve to play in the NC, Kansas State deserved it...?"
This post was edited on 9/19/13 at 9:16 am
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:16 am to gorillacoco
quote:
they didn't deserve to be in the game it doesn't matter how bad the final score looked
They were the best team. The scoreline proved everybody right for voting Bama into that game. Not just the scoreline, but the way they exposed our weaknesses. That was a great year for LSU, but by the end of the season, the team had serious flaws.
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:18 am to Palomitz
quote:
One thing they got right, though, is that they picked the 2 best teams in America during that time period, and that is fair enough.
I wonder why they went away from the "2 best teams" philosophy last year?
Posted on 9/19/13 at 9:25 am to uway
quote:
Why should it have been us and not them?
I think you know the answer to this question. They backed into it after begging and pleading for months.
quote:
They kicked our behinds in New Orleans
That game was tailor made for them to win. Often that's how rematches play out between 2 top teams that have very similar talent. Team that won the first game goes into the rematch overconfident. Not to mention it was being played in New Orleans which only added to the overconfidence of the LSU side. The team that lost the first game has a chip on their shoulder and something to prove.
quote:
they destroyed us in the Dome.
Meh, it was no more than a 2 possesstion game almost the entire game. The last TD to put it out of reach came after the game was decided. It was 6-0 for almost the entire first half, until another FG right before the half made it 9-0. Then 12-0 for a while and then 15-0. All that time the dome was still filled with nervous energy on both sides because everyone was just waiting for LSU to bust a big play and make it a one possession game. Unfortunately it just didn't happen.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News