- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:53 pm to red sox fan 13
quote:
If LSU wants to drag BK through the mud and air his dirty laundry they could probably get a reduced buyout but it’s a question of if you want to go through that.
lol. No.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:56 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
They will go into actions to prove cause.
Too late.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:57 pm to DBG
Ah yes, I’m sure that will hold up well in the court of law. By your common sense standard, what is the minimum amount of money that BK can make at his next job that will not end in LSU taking him to court?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:02 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Ah yes, I’m sure that will hold up well in the court of law
That’s why you sue. It’s not a stretch to say a coach with 200+ career wins should make more than a coach with a sub .500 record.
You’re just so fricking contrarian on everything, it doesn’t click for you.
quote:
what is the minimum amount of money that BK can make at his next job that will not end in LSU taking him to court?
7.5+
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:05 pm to GeauxLSU4
frick Kelly, he didn’t live up to his end of the deal so if we can frick his fat arse out of a couple million we should
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:06 pm to LSBoosie
Cause? How about suboptimal performance!
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:08 pm to TheJuicey
If someone owed you 50 million would you just puss out and say ok I will take half of what I am owed?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:10 pm to LSBoosie
There ought to be a clause in all these coaches contracts that prorates the payout based on a winning % and time in postion. After 4 years, if a coach fails to win, why should you pay 100%?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:10 pm to wfallstiger
quote:
How about suboptimal performance!
Well, yes, that’s why he was fired.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:13 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Hey, LSU morons, thats what you get for not immediately taking action when he was found to be fricking someone other than his wife, who i believe was LSU related.
marital infidelity will never trigger a morals clause which BTW does not exist in BK's contract beyond any behavior affecting LSU brand like breaking the law or failure to comply with NCAA.
quote:
read this
I am a conservative Republican and that article is about as alt right as it gets and they got the Jimbo contract info wrong again.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:14 pm to DBG
quote:
That’s why you sue. It’s not a stretch to say a coach with 200+ career wins should make more than a coach with a sub .500 record.
And it’s not a stretch to say that a long time NFL head coach has a better resume than the guy that had half his wins at Grand Valley State and Central Michigan.
quote:
You’re just so fricking contrarian on everything, it doesn’t click for you.
You’re the only who replied to me disagreeing lmao
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:14 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
They will go into actions to prove cause. That's why its not officially written. If he knows that does exist, he'll settle. That's how you'll know
The contract does not allow for any sort of retroactive firing for cause. There is a process outlined in the K for firing for cause, and nothing indicates LSU followed that process.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:15 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
There ought to be a clause in all these coaches contracts that prorates the payout based on a winning % and time in postion. After 4 years, if a coach fails to win, why should you pay 100%?
Lmao why would any coach agree to this?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:19 pm to LSBoosie
quote:Why would you hire a coach that does not believe after 4 years they can produce the results needed to meet expectations for an established upper tier program?
Lmao why would any coach agree to this?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:19 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
that if LSU were to fire him for cause
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:21 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
Why would you hire a coach that does not believe after 4 years they can produce the results needed to meet expectations for an established upper tier program?
I mean of course they all believe it but a coach would be stupid to agree to that when they have offers for other jobs that don’t include that clause.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:23 pm to LSBoosie
Fine. Pay him $800K a month and offset that when he works again. He’s got bad advice if he thinks LSU is going to write him a $50 million dollar check. LOL!
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:24 pm to CapitalTiger
quote:
Actually the opposite. He’s trying to get LSU’s settlement finalized to help his negotiations with schools.
Huh? Unless that is the worst contract ever written, IF the coach wants to play hardball on the amount to be paid over several years, Kelly would be PROHIBITED from taking another football job. Sssssoooo, as the poster you responded to said, he intends to retire. Otherwise, every contract I've ever heard of says the ONLY way you can coach again while forcing a school to pay out your contract with them is to GIVE up money from the contract.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:29 pm to LSBoosie
quote:There were people on this site that day reporting this. Anyone who thinks people on this site don’t have sauces is lying to themselves.
Woodward said LSU wanted to enter negotiations to pay Kelly a lump-sum payment of $25 million instead of the full buyout. LSU offered “one or more accelerated payments,” documents say, and the elimination of mitigation or offset language should Kelly get another job in football.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News