- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU All-time basketball team vs. anyone else's
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:01 pm to wil
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:01 pm to wil
quote:
Vince Carter would not stop Maravich. The Pistol lit up some of the best defensive NBA guards of his time. Walt Frazier was supoosed to be the best defensive guard in the NBA at the time, and Maravich scored over 30 on him. (Actually, it may have been close to 40).
When THe Pistol played in college, there was no 3 point shot. I read an article several years ago that someone reviewed several game tapes of Maravich, and in those, over 30% of the shots he made were from 3 point range.
Maravich single-handedly took LSU to the Final Four. I really don't think Carter would stop THe Pistol.
Walt Frazier isn't 6'7" and he couldn't jump out of the gym. There's a huge difference between the huge athletic guards that play today and the smaller guards of the past. Pete Maravich was a genius at playing basketball and way ahead of his time but his scoring skills would not translate into the numbers he put up back then in today's game. He'd still be a stud IMO because he played closer to today's game than most players in his era but against a more modern player he'd come down to earth.
He played against much less talent in college than today's players face. He also didn't have all that much talent around him and for the team to be competitive he had to score a ton of points. That is why his numbers are so ridiculous and why Jordan's NBA numbers are all the more amazing. The level of talent Jordan faced was very high and he was still a dominant force. It's the same with Kobe Bryant and Lebron James today. Especially Lebron as he has freakish athletic skills for a player his size.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:25 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Walt Frazier isn't 6'7" and he couldn't jump out of the gym. There's a huge difference between the huge athletic guards that play today and the smaller guards of the past. Pete Maravich was a genius at playing basketball and way ahead of his time but his scoring skills would not translate into the numbers he put up back then in today's game. He'd still be a stud IMO because he played closer to today's game than most players in his era but against a more modern player he'd come down to earth.
Walt was 6'4" and could dunk a basketball. He's also one of the NBA all-time great defensive players. Pete dominated a younger Frazier when Pete was on the downhill side of his NBA career. Dropped 68 points on the all-star Frazier and the Knicks on 2/25/1977. I have zero doubt a college Pistol would drive a college MJ insane. MJ didn't shoot the same percentage in college as he did in the NBA. He didn't improve his shooting and his defense til he got to the NBA in fact. College MJ would probably get embarassed by Pete. There's a video above of a prime MJ trying to stop Chris Jackson that someone else posted. CJ was spectacular at LSU. If you take CJ's ability and multiply it times 2 you get Pete Maravich.
Neither Lew nor Wilt would stop Shaq in the post, they'd have to play hack-a-shaq. Shaq would muscle either one of them down then turn and dunk. Shaq was way too athletic and strong for either of them. see this:
LINK
*around the 50 second mark it shows Shaq jumping OVER THE TOP of a 6'10" center,catching a rebound with one hand and slamming it back thru all at one time. I was at that game. The video doesn't do it justice.
This post was edited on 1/25/09 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:38 pm to LockdownDefense
Our team would destroy the earth! It'd be like if Matt Flynn ran the world.
This post was edited on 1/25/09 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:49 pm to LockdownDefense
quote:
Neither Lew nor Wilt would stop Shaq in the post, they'd have to play hack-a-shaq. Shaq would muscle either one of them down then turn and dunk. Shaq was way too athletic and strong for either of them. see this:
I still think both were more dominant in their time than Shaq was in his (in college), which is really IMO what the comparisons are about. And I think you're selling Chamberlain a bit short on athleticism...he was a phenomenal athlete and wasn't that much smaller than Shaq. Ran track at Kansas. I think the strength argument holds water with Jabbar...less with Wilt.
This post was edited on 1/25/09 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 1/25/09 at 9:59 pm to BayouBengals03
No doubt, we'd have an impressive starting five. But you've also got to consider chemistry, bench strength, and coaching. Our all-time team might actually improve if you took out one or two of the superstars and replaced them with a Blanton, Singleton, Martin or Taylor, or even Mike Hansen. Those were TEAM guys that really made the TEAM better.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:02 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Did you even look at the UNC list I posted? They have 3X or more of the "superstars" that LSU has produced.
It's not about quantity...it's the other q word.
Give me Shaq, the greatest center in collegiate history, over Eric Montross and Antoine Jamison combined.
With the exception of MJ, UNC has never put out a guard more talented than Pistol and Chris Jackson. No way. Don't give me your Hubert Davis and Ed Cota bullshite, either.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:12 pm to PiscesTiger
Pete is the greatest college bball player ever, CJ the greatest freshmen ever, and Shaq arguably the greatest college center ever (and National POY). That's a helluva trio and I didn't even mention Petit. No question, when you go with depth LSU is screwed, but this is about our top 5.
Oh, and for the record I love Tyrus and his contributions were outstanding but he has no business on here for what he did as a college player. He was 2nd team all-sec and the third best player on the team for most of the season
Oh, and for the record I love Tyrus and his contributions were outstanding but he has no business on here for what he did as a college player. He was 2nd team all-sec and the third best player on the team for most of the season
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:17 pm to lsumatt
Yeah, our starting 5 could take anyone's.
If LSU all-time played Florida's back to back championship teams and Duke's '91 and '92 teams, we'd win by 30, on all accounts.
If LSU all-time played Florida's back to back championship teams and Duke's '91 and '92 teams, we'd win by 30, on all accounts.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:23 pm to wil
quote:
I really don't think Carter would stop THe Pistol.
Pistol wouldnt stop Carter either
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:36 pm to Lester Earl
At the top of the key, who would you want with the ball in his hands- Pistol Pete or Vince? I would take Pete 100 out of 100 times without a doubt!
Posted on 1/25/09 at 10:38 pm to Tiger in Texas
i didnt say Vince Carter is better than Pistol. That's fricking stupid
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:07 pm to wil
quote:
Maravich single-handedly took LSU to the Final Four
i dunno what the frick you are talking about. it is widely known that lsu never even appeared in the ncaa tournament with maravich.
on the other hand, if we wanna talk about single handedly leading a team to the national title, i think danny and the miracles have some input. thanks for proving that kansas is better.
honestly, nobody in this thread has even addressed kansas besides me, and they are the 2nd best all time team behind ucla.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:18 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
It's not about quantity...it's the other q word.
Give me Shaq, the greatest center in collegiate history, over Eric Montross and Antoine Jamison combined.
With the exception of MJ, UNC has never put out a guard more talented than Pistol and Chris Jackson. No way. Don't give me your Hubert Davis and Ed Cota bullshite, either.
Walter Davis was up there and proved it as a pro. He certainly had a more prolific pro career than Chris Jackson.
BTW, you're about the only person in the thread that puts Shaq anywhere near the greatest college center in history. There are guys named Alcindor, Hayes, Hakeem, Walton, Russell and Chamberlain that are ahead of him on that list.
It's pretty hard to knock North Carolina basketball. Unlike Duke they put a ton of players into the pros that turn into stars in the NBA.
BTW, the Chris Jackson vs. the Bulls video. He had a great game. How many great games did MJ have? You tell me who the dominate player was between the two and who has the rings to prove it.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:20 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
i dunno what the frick you are talking about. it is widely known that lsu never even appeared in the ncaa tournament with maravich.
on the other hand, if we wanna talk about single handedly leading a team to the national title, i think danny and the miracles have some input. thanks for proving that kansas is better.
honestly, nobody in this thread has even addressed kansas besides me, and they are the 2nd best all time team behind ucla.
In your opinion alone in this thread are they the 2nd best all-time. Kansas has produced some incredible talent but I don't see them that close to the top. I'd take that Maryland team against them and take my chances.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:21 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
G Pete Maravich
G Chris Jackson
F Bob Pettit
F Rudy Macklin
C Shaquille O'Neal
This team wouldn't work well with Pete jacking up shots. No one else would get enough touches to make an impact.
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:38 pm to The Boat
Posted on 1/25/09 at 11:59 pm to VABuckeye
That is a great all-time 5, but really the Pistol, Chris Jackson, and Shaq - Shaq would never see the ball. You can't really compare players from different eras - for example, how would Bob Petit do playing an up tempo team like UNC could put together.
Posted on 1/26/09 at 12:11 am to BayouBengals03
Pick the top five from any decent program and you'd get a pretty good roster.
No question LSU would have highlight moments, but against the top 5 in UNC/Duke/Indiana/etc. history? A good placing but not a winner.
No question LSU would have highlight moments, but against the top 5 in UNC/Duke/Indiana/etc. history? A good placing but not a winner.
Posted on 1/26/09 at 8:03 am to The Boat
quote:
This team wouldn't work well with Pete jacking up shots. No one else would get enough touches to make an impact.
agreed
Posted on 1/26/09 at 8:27 am to Hardwood Tiger
Kentucky combinations would be interesting, but:
Dan Issel
Kenny Walker
Jamal Mashburn
Kevin Grevey
Kyle Macy
Pretty frickin' formidable. Lotta All-American awards in that group.
Dan Issel
Kenny Walker
Jamal Mashburn
Kevin Grevey
Kyle Macy
Pretty frickin' formidable. Lotta All-American awards in that group.
Popular
Back to top


1






