Started By
Message

re: Live hearing thread

Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48991 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

But that’s the difference and the SEC has made it clear that said difference is what they’re hinging on.


But stating: Not withdrawing your name from the NFL draft and leaving collegiate athletics also makes them ineligible to return.

That's everyone else who has returned to date outside of LSU.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:10 pm
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
476 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to
If the judge rules in favor of the players, lsu will play them. You are nuts, and weak.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38930 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Yes, LSU cutting contact with these guys and committing to not rostering them would immediately end the situation as it relates to LSU. IDGAF if the plaintiffs keep going.



How many times do you weak people need it explained?


If the players win this case and we cut bait they will name us directly


Sankey has screwed this up so badly that he has institutions liable directly



This has already happened with Mizzou
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
10334 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

How many times do you weak people need it explained? If the players win this case and we cut bait they will name us directly Sankey has screwed this up so badly that he has institutions liable directly This has already happened with Mizzou


In Michael Scott’s voice:

“Double jeopardy”.
Posted by Curtis Lowe
Member since Dec 2019
1752 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

They are trying to find a legal way to get a federal court to overrule a state court, which means they have to find some federal law. It is a hail mary.

It is not criminal to file suit.


However, it is sanctionable to file frivolous lawsuit.
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
34624 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

From live testimony just now in the Pyburn v NCAA hearing: Mr. Downton: Mr. Sankey, you’ve testified that the SEC follows all NCAA by-laws and incorporates them into your conference’s by-laws, which I appreciate, but did I just hear you say that as the SEC Commissioner, you don’t know what the current NCAA 5 for 5 bylaws that took effect 8/1/26 actually say? Answer: I don’t. It’s the first time I’ve seen this new manual


This is one way to know that he’s telling the truth. Nobody lying would actually say something that fricking stupid.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

the players win this case and we cut bait they will name us directly

ZERO chance of recovery.

quote:

This has already happened with Mizzou

ZERO chance of recovery. Very easy summary judgment. Zero entitlement to the relief granted.

Totally a non-concern.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46686 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

The distinction between us and Texas etc is a contract.



quote:

But that’s the difference and the SEC has made it clear that said difference is what they’re hinging on.


Thats not what Sankey said on the stand today at all. He never said it was a contract. He said camps, he said leaving behind college, etc.

And those other players absolutely signed contracts and got paid. Did these oversees basketball professionals play without contracts?

They also made up that "contract" rule AFTER the 5 for 5. It wont stand. period.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38930 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:13 pm to
You understand that the Mizzou player won the TRO right?
Posted by Tifway419
Member since Sep 2022
2458 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

The new LSU regime is not going to get pushed around.
John Carmouche sits on the LSU Board of Supervisors, and was one of the 5 on the coach search Committee who selected Lane. By all accounts, he is a ruthless attorney, who holds grudges, and is very successful in his cases - even winning a $750Mil lawsuit against Chevron.

The SEC’s suit against LSU today was nit only garbage, it was near sighted and stupid. Good luck
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

If the judge rules in favor of the players, lsu will play them. You are nuts, and weak.

No, they won’t. LSU has good lawyers.
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
383 Hoosier Daddy Lane
Member since Dec 2013
39298 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by burreauxsballz
Member since Jan 2022
2075 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm to
This is most definitely cause for concern. And the fact that they have numbers of potential NIL figures form LSU just makes it easier for them to prove damages if we cut bait now
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

You understand that the Mizzou player won the TRO right?

Go ahead, state the exact relief granted. Quote the order.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:15 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38930 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:15 pm to
What is we are fine
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
4153 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

John Carmouche


Stone cold killer
Posted by Raging Tiger
Teedy Town
Member since Jun 2023
1467 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:16 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

This is most definitely cause for concern. And the fact that they have numbers of potential NIL figures form LSU just makes it easier for them to prove damages if we cut bait now

Nope. Enough to survive exceptions in state court or a 12b6 in federal court? Yes maybe.

Actual recovery? Zero exposure for LSU. LSU has NO obligation under any circumstance to these guys if LSU chooses not to take them based on NCAA and SEC court-upheld rulings.

Zero. None. Ever.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38930 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Go ahead, state the exact relief granted. Quote the order.



quote:

The latest court filing, if granted, would prevent the university from declaring Webb ineligible this year, declining to certify his eligibility, withholding any revenue-sharing or NIL compensation he is due to earn and, perhaps most importantly, withholding him from “practice, competition, team travel, or any other intercollegiate athletics activity during the 2026-2027 academic year.”


LINK

Posted by burreauxsballz
Member since Jan 2022
2075 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:17 pm to
Come in Kentucky, waters feeling nice!
Jump to page
Page First 64 65 66 67 68 ... 83
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 66 of 83Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram