- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm to UnsureTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
I'm assuming his ruling will come after that.
Most judges would take something like this under advisement. Whatever he does is going to be appealed so he’s going to want to have a well reasoned ruling citing to authority. Wouldn’t shock me if there isn’t a ruling today
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:50 pm
3
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm to UnsureTiger
If The Egg is unsure you could ship it to his home.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm to Casualobserver1985
Women's soccer and volleyball already has 5 for 5 athletes playing in the NCAA. But nobody gives a shite about women's sports to make a deal of it
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:50 pm to tzimme4
Amen to that from this old Tiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:50 pm to lsufball19
Im expecting a form of no one plays this weekend for football, any who did play already can keep playing. And a written decision next week sometime
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:50 pm to UnsureTiger
your anonymity is protected by all of us . We are unsure tigers who are unsure who unsure tiger is. does he even exists? batman?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:51 pm to DeplorableTerrorizer
quote:
Im expecting a form of no one plays this weekend for football, any who did play already can keep playing. And a written decision next week sometime
Yep. Unless he briefed his ruling before today like the Oxford judge did with Chambliss. Took a 20 minute recess and came back with an hour plus long ruling
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:51 pm to Raging Tiger
This guy is from University City in Kenner. I coached him from 12 -15 in Dizzy Dean Baseball. Pretty good player, just couldn't hit for shite.
Went to Rummel, then Tulane as his Dad was a huge Greenbacker guy. Once he went to Tulane he took a far left turn (his Dad was nothing like this. Salt of the earth who would drink beer at the playground after games and practices)
Now he's at UTa. When I used to be on Facebook, I argued incessantly with him. Thank God, I got out of that cesspool.
Anyhoo, he hates LSU with a passion and has a substandard HS education, so take whatever he says with a heavy, HEAVY grain of salt, he's irrelevant.
Went to Rummel, then Tulane as his Dad was a huge Greenbacker guy. Once he went to Tulane he took a far left turn (his Dad was nothing like this. Salt of the earth who would drink beer at the playground after games and practices)
Now he's at UTa. When I used to be on Facebook, I argued incessantly with him. Thank God, I got out of that cesspool.
Anyhoo, he hates LSU with a passion and has a substandard HS education, so take whatever he says with a heavy, HEAVY grain of salt, he's irrelevant.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:52 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Most judges would take something like this under advisement. Whatever he does is going to be appealed so he’s going to want to have a well reasoned ruling citing to authority. Wouldn’t shock me if there isn’t a ruling today
He has to rule on the injunction today, no?
If he’s going to take the preliminary injunction under advisement, he’ll have to extend the TRO. Which in and of itself telegraphs where he’s at.
Frankly, if he hadn’t made his mind up on briefing alone in this one he’s a low IQ moron. Which, admittedly is a possibility because he’s an elected judge in EbR
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:52 pm to More beer please
quote:
So the SEC is attempting to sanction LSU for complying with court orders and if we dont comply, then we get sued by the player.
They are actively threatening LSU. It’s starting to look like Sankey is actively trying to coerce LSU into violating the injunction which sounds like a criminal matter.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:53 pm to Wing T
You must be talking about Scott Schneider
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:53 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Most judges would take something like this under advisement. Whatever he does is going to be appealed so he’s going to want to have a well reasoned ruling citing to authority. Wouldn’t shock me if there isn’t a ruling today
I agree with you in most cases, but I'd be surprised if there is no ruling today.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:54 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
He has to rule on the injunction today, no? If he’s going to take the preliminary injunction under advisement, he’ll have to extend the TRO. Which in and of itself telegraphs where he’s at.
This happens all the time in litigation and it’s not really indicative of anything
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:55 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
agree with you in most cases
But injunction hearings?
The brothers Johnson and other idiots up there notoriously take anything that requires reading more than a Dr Suess book under advisement—but for injunctions?
It’s practically the only procedural vessel that shouldn’t be eligible for delayed judgment
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:55 pm to BugAC
quote:
They are actively threatening LSU. It’s starting to look like Sankey is actively trying to coerce LSU into violating the injunction which sounds like a criminal matter.
They are trying to find a legal way to get a federal court to overrule a state court, which means they have to find some federal law. It is a hail mary.
It is not criminal to file suit.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:56 pm to lsufball19
quote:
This happens all the time in litigation and it’s not really indicative of anything
I’m Incredibly aware of how often bad judges use advisement to make decisions.
I don’t think that’s practical here.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:57 pm to More beer please
quote:
And yet posters are confused why we wont "drop" something that we didnt start? When these players win the injunction, NCAA/SEC/LSU will be sued for not rostering them just like the player in Missouri is doing. So the SEC is attempting to sanction LSU for complying with court orders and if we dont comply, then we get sued by the player.
It’s amazing how few people understand this.
LSU hasn’t done anything. There’s nothing for us to drop.
The SEC is mad that we’ve signaled that we will obey a court order.
They’re being insane and all we have to do is prepare for Clemson
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:57 pm to tigerskin
You must be talking about Scott Schneider
Yessir. His Dad Gary and Mom Cookie were awesome folks. He's a woke delusional bitch.
Yessir. His Dad Gary and Mom Cookie were awesome folks. He's a woke delusional bitch.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:57 pm to Wing T
quote:
Went to Rummel
Raider Pride brah
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:58 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
They are trying to find a legal way to get a federal court to overrule a state court, which means they have to find some federal law. It is a hail mary.
It is not criminal to file suit.
No, but contempt of court is.
Sounds contempt-y to a non-lawyer.
Page 64 of 71
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News