- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lacy's Attorney Responds to LSP Video
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:41 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:41 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Do you not understand that is exactly what the LSP is doing? Releasing only what they want for their side
This is why a court and jury with all evidence needs to be involved instead of social media sleuths or attention seekers.
0
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:51 pm to sgallo3
quote:i kinda felt like this is EXACTLY what happened. People can twist it all kinds of way but my words above is 100% what happened.
quote:
KL started a negligent chain reaction and inside that chain reaction, funyon's negligence led to a death via car wreck. This is 100% what happened imo.
Your explanation is the most reasonable.
quote:this is where it gets cloudy for me as this is another language. I guess this can be deciphered with "law". My mind and gut tells me what I said above but in terms of "law" I wouldn't know.
There is a small contingent that believes KL's negligence over ecompasses the other driver's negligence.
quote:yeah. Possibly that can go both ways possibly.
Basically "you arent cheating unless you get caught" and she wouldnt have got caught if not for KL's actions.
In the end, KL is gone and wont ever get a chance for a court to decide. However, I feel like KL was not liable for the accident. I felt like funyons is liable. Based on the black box that showed her speeding, she admitted to eating and not using proper following distance. Tbh, I don't understand why this isn't a no brainer.
It doesnt matter why the gold truck stopped and pulled over , even still sticking out into the road, "a vehicle" behind that gold truck "is resonsible" no matter what, to slow down and stop if need be safely no matter what is presented in front of her. She did none of this correctly like eveyone else did. It is proven by her words and black box she was clearly negligent.
It was proven KL was already back into his lane before she swerved across center line. KL didnt make her swerve, her ignorance did.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 10/9/25 at 1:24 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Defense attorney uses half truths and whole lies to redirect blame...
this is what they are trained to do...
In court, they don't need to prove their client was innocent, they only need to cast doubt on the prosecution. That's all he is doing.
Why does Kyren even have an attorney? He's Dead!
I suspect his family is planning to sue someone, and they need to make Kyren appear innocent so they can work on a settlement.
this is what they are trained to do...
In court, they don't need to prove their client was innocent, they only need to cast doubt on the prosecution. That's all he is doing.
Why does Kyren even have an attorney? He's Dead!
I suspect his family is planning to sue someone, and they need to make Kyren appear innocent so they can work on a settlement.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 1:25 pm to Crow Pie
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 10/9/25 at 1:37 pm to bayou85
Cops do that a lot. Cherry pick witnesses to fit their Report when cops didn't see any of it. Look at the video later, amend your report. Witnesses get too excited to give good and actual evidence
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Lacy was speeding to pass five cars.
old dude in grey truck sees this and slams his brakes as lacy was in his lane.
white car behind grey truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck and hits suv head on.
now.......lacy was able to get back into the right lane before the head on collision but, the grey truck doesn't slam on the brakes if lacy wasn't flying towards him.
tough call on this one.
old dude in grey truck sees this and slams his brakes as lacy was in his lane.
white car behind grey truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck and hits suv head on.
now.......lacy was able to get back into the right lane before the head on collision but, the grey truck doesn't slam on the brakes if lacy wasn't flying towards him.
tough call on this one.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:42 pm to tigerdup07
quote:
Lacy was speeding to pass five cars.
old dude in grey truck sees this and slams his brakes as lacy was in his lane.
white car behind grey truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck and hits suv head on.
now.......lacy was able to get back into the right lane before the head on collision but, the grey truck doesn't slam on the brakes if lacy wasn't flying towards him.
tough call on this one.
Man you've got all those details hammered down. Great job idiot.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:49 pm to sharkfhin
When Ory says Lacy is innocent, he is defending his client from criminal charges. And I agree that Lacy is innocent of criminal charges.
Ory said multiple times “this is a civil case, not a criminal case” and he leaves it at that.
Now, if a civil trial were held, I don’t think Lacy would stand much of a chance. His lawyer probably doesn’t either. But he can’t just come out and say that part.
Ory said multiple times “this is a civil case, not a criminal case” and he leaves it at that.
Now, if a civil trial were held, I don’t think Lacy would stand much of a chance. His lawyer probably doesn’t either. But he can’t just come out and say that part.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:11 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
When Ory says Lacy is innocent, he is defending his client from criminal charges. And I agree that Lacy is innocent of criminal charges.
I would agree too, unless reckless driving is a criminal offence. No he should not be charged with negligent or vehicular homicide......if he were alive.
Why again was it necessary to defend his dead client from criminal charges?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:44 pm to bayou85
quote:
ETA: I'm not defending his actions. He was driving like a selfish arse and he would probably be civilly liable, but to act like this chick is innocent is flat out BS. Most accidents occur because of people like her not paying attention and making poor decisions.
This is generally my position as well. He clearly deserved to be charged with reckless driving, but the proximate and primary cause of the accident was the lady not paying attention, following too closely, and driving too fast. No one else had a problem slowing down to avoid an accident. No additional cars behind her or behind the truck she hit were caught up in the wreck because they did not have time to react. She was the only one who failed to stop safely.
Everyone keeps arguing that the wreck wouldn’t have happened if not for Lacy’s reckless driving. While I believe it’s likely the accident would not have happened if the gold truck hadn’t slowed down because Lacy was in his lane up ahead, I don’t know that we know for sure that the lady wasn’t going to have to take evasive action as the truck slowed due to the speed limit change anyway.
Regardless of that, Lacy was back in his lane more than the legally required distance in front of oncoming traffic. It was a no-passing zone and he was speeding, but would the chain of events turned out any differently if he were passing legally and not speeding? He still would have been in the opposite lane of traffic the same (legal) distance ahead of the gold truck. While he was driving reckless, I don’t see that as the cause of the accident. He could have been passing legally (in a similar location) and the same chain of events would still have occurred.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:13 pm to BearCrocs
No it’s not you idiot all you know is really nothing about the accident the only thing in fact that you know is the green charger was passing other cars at a high speed but you actually do not know who caused the wreck
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:13 pm to deuceiswild
Your probably right.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:23 pm to TeddyPadillac
I'm not sure. Maybe his family simply wants closure and to have his name cleared so he is not considered a criminal.
And maybe, but I'm not sure, being, or not being criminally negligent somehow plays into any future civil suits that may be filed.
And maybe, but I'm not sure, being, or not being criminally negligent somehow plays into any future civil suits that may be filed.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:26 pm to tigerdup07
quote:this is where the accident is caused by funyon because o f her negligent driving.
white car behind grey(gold) truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck
This sounds really shitty but think of it like this....
KL's idiot driving was a "test" , everyone passed the test except funyon. This situation was easily preventable. Nobody had an accident that was easily preventable except her.
I know this is speculation but im willing to bet her eyes were distracted either by her food or a cell phone.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:33 pm to tigerdup07
quote:
white car behind grey truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck and hits suv head on.
Going too fast then
Haven't watched video was is she funyons? I think distracted driver and panic
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:34 pm to TeddyPadillac
Every one is entitled to their opinions about people. But I'll say this.... if you ever sit on a jury, depending on the nature of the case, it may change your opinion. I happened to have been a juror in a criminal case that Ory was representing the defendant. His client had no case whatsoever. But I respect the job Ory did. It was interesting to watch.
I used to be one of those people who thought defense attorneys were the scum of the earth. But that jury experience changed my mind completely. They're absolutely necessary, even to defend the worst people on the planet.
The police, the judge, and the DA are all on the same team. They all represent the state against one defendant. And in the case I was a juror, I felt the defendant, while absolutely guilty, was facing stacked charges. Additionally, there was absolutely shoddy police work done on the case. I was not successful, but I did argue for throwing out the lesser of the charges due to the shoddy police work. That was my way of sending a message. The guilty should face the consequences... no less and no more than what fits the crime. I felt he was overcharged. Good defense attorneys are an essential part of the system.
I used to be one of those people who thought defense attorneys were the scum of the earth. But that jury experience changed my mind completely. They're absolutely necessary, even to defend the worst people on the planet.
The police, the judge, and the DA are all on the same team. They all represent the state against one defendant. And in the case I was a juror, I felt the defendant, while absolutely guilty, was facing stacked charges. Additionally, there was absolutely shoddy police work done on the case. I was not successful, but I did argue for throwing out the lesser of the charges due to the shoddy police work. That was my way of sending a message. The guilty should face the consequences... no less and no more than what fits the crime. I felt he was overcharged. Good defense attorneys are an essential part of the system.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:47 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
KL's idiot driving was a "test" , everyone passed the test except funyon. This situation was easily preventable. Nobody had an accident that was easily preventable except her. I know this is speculation but im willing to bet her eyes were distracted either by her food or a cell phone.
These are a couple of the reasons that I believe Lacy is innocent of criminal charges. That, and the line in the DA report where it says he couldn't have known he caused the accident. Not sure I agree, but that's what it says.
I won't say the accident was easily preventable, but there is at least a small chance the accident happens even if Lacy was not on the road that day. And it's very possible that the lady in the car was distracted. Reasonable doubt. That's what you need for criminal cases.
I live less than two miles from the scene and I drive through it four days a week. Just passed an hour ago, actually. That video has a wide lense. 72 yards isn't what people think it is while driving. I'll just say that objects in camera are closer than they appear lol. The truck had no option but to get off the road. The lady had no choice either, imo. She made a bad decision. She should have rear ended the truck whether it happened in her lane or half way off the road had she followed him. This is why I believe that your version of the case would not hold up in civil court. The entire video is there and it's clear that Lacy was very likely the cause of the accident. In my opinion, he is absolutely the cause. The truck didn't brake and veer right for no reason. The white car didn't veer into the left lane for no reason. They had less time and distance than that video makes it seem.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:51 pm to tigerdup07
quote:
old dude in grey truck sees this and slams his brakes as lacy was in his lane.
white car behind grey truck turns left to avoid colliding into grey truck and hits suv head on.
now.......lacy was able to get back into the right lane before the head on collision but, the grey truck doesn't slam on the brakes if lacy wasn't flying towards him.
FYI - The gold truck never slammed on its brakes. You can see the black box data that shows this and you can hear him tell the cop that he didn't slam on the brakes or skid.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:53 pm to tigerdup07
quote:
IvoryBillMatt
Lacy was speeding to pass five cars.
3 cars and an 18 wheeler
quote:
grey truck
Gold
Posted on 10/9/25 at 5:10 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
He could have been passing legally (in a similar location) and the same chain of events would still have occurred.
This is what I was trying to say in another post. Take away the NPZ and although he was speeding, he did make it back into the southbound lane.
You said what I was trying to say much better than I did.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News