- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lacy's Attorney Responds to LSP Video
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:31 pm to bayou85
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:31 pm to bayou85
quote:
He called his brothers father. According to his attorney, they didn't talk about legal things.
That’s hearsay. Nobody is going to get KLs phone records, so this cannot be proven. Brothers dad is a convenient scapegoat in this situation.
2
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:32 pm to IvoryBillMatt
One thing is clear - no td.com reader will be eligible for this jury
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Based on what we see and has been determined, imo...
KL is guilty of illegally passing cars in a NPZ.
KL dangerously forced a truck to stop and pullover.
Funyon Lady not paying attention and not using safe driving tactics beforehand and during this ordeal had to make an abrupt decision to either hit a truck or swerve into oncoming traffic(she stated she was trying to go around the gold truck who pulled off). Using easy regular safe driving tactics would have prevented her from doing so by being able to slow down and stop just like "everyone else did".
Funyon lady imo is responsible for the accident.
KL didnt make her not pay attention.
KL didnt make her eat while driving.
KL didnt make her speed(50mph in a 45 zone)
KL didnt make her not use proper following distance.
KL "did" make her make a decision she wasnt ready for and because of her "own negligence" she caused an accident.
KL is not responsible for her "own negligence".
End of story
Just for info: regardless what KL did wrong, he was literally already back into his lane before funyon lady crossed center line. This shows funyon woman is at fault imo.
KL is guilty of illegally passing cars in a NPZ.
KL dangerously forced a truck to stop and pullover.
Funyon Lady not paying attention and not using safe driving tactics beforehand and during this ordeal had to make an abrupt decision to either hit a truck or swerve into oncoming traffic(she stated she was trying to go around the gold truck who pulled off). Using easy regular safe driving tactics would have prevented her from doing so by being able to slow down and stop just like "everyone else did".
Funyon lady imo is responsible for the accident.
KL didnt make her not pay attention.
KL didnt make her eat while driving.
KL didnt make her speed(50mph in a 45 zone)
KL didnt make her not use proper following distance.
KL "did" make her make a decision she wasnt ready for and because of her "own negligence" she caused an accident.
KL is not responsible for her "own negligence".
End of story
Just for info: regardless what KL did wrong, he was literally already back into his lane before funyon lady crossed center line. This shows funyon woman is at fault imo.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:40 pm to Lgrnwd
quote:
Yes he probably would rather that. That way like a lot of people he could just go on believing what he WANTS to believe instead of being challenged with facts.
No dumbass
I want a state agency not to get down in the muck with a defense attorney. That’s not the function of the State police.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:40 pm to RB10
This is what the incident sounds like to me. If Funyun would've just ran into Lacy, since he was the one that triggered this, then this incident would've never occurred.
If Step 1 caused the accident then why wasn't his vehicle damaged. Have a good day.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:41 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
KL didnt make her not pay attention.
KL didnt make her eat while driving.
KL didnt make her speed(50mph in a 45 zone)
KL didnt make her not use proper following distance.
If KL wasn’t on the road that day, does anything she did that day result in this accident?
We all speed sometimes, follow too close at times, and look at the radio/phone/eat for a second. She happened to do that at the most inopportune time. 99.9% of the time what she was doing doesn’t result in a crash. It did that day, b/c KL was driving like a dumbass in a well known congested area where people who drive there regularly never see someone passing multiple cars up like KL did.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:43 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:Maybe. Impossible to know. Distracted drivers following too closely cause accidents everyday
KL wasn’t on the road that day, does anything she did that day result in this accident?
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:44 pm to USAFTiger42
quote:
This is what the incident sounds like to me. If Funyun would've just ran into Lacy, since he was the one that triggered this, then this incident would've never occurred.
If Step 1 caused the accident then why wasn't his vehicle damaged. Have a good day.
So if I run a red-light causing two other vehicles to collide, but I avoid any contact, I'm not responsible?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I posted the video just for those who are interested. The sync issue was interesting. I just don't see how you can get around the "but for" standard applied to Lacy's reckless driving.
But for standard is 1 of multiple elements of negligence
and then you have intervening factors.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:46 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
That’s hearsay. Nobody is going to get KLs phone records, so this cannot be proven. Brothers dad is a convenient scapegoat in this situation.
Then him calling a lawyer is hearsay. If nobody is going to get his phone records. But news sure said it like it was fact. But you're right, we don't actually know the truth. But the cop telling a witness what to say on body cam is bad policing. He took the word of other witnesses, namely the girl involved and tried to apply it to the other witness who said that's not what happened. You cant cherry pick info from witnesses. Red truck guy was also verifiably wrong with this account that was on body cam. He said lacy crossed between the cars and then one hit the other. Also, when the cop is taking the red truck's statement, he let 2 or 3 other people be there. Thats bad. You can't get a witness statement accurate if 3 people are inputting.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:46 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:Phone records are always obtainable in a criminal investigation and almost always subject to discovery in civil litigation. The conversation itself might or might be privileged depending on the identity of other party and whether a third party heard the conversation.
Nobody is going to get KLs phone records,
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:47 pm to Ice Cold
quote:
Phone records are always obtainable in a criminal investigation and almost always subject to discovery in civil litigation. The conversation itself might or might be privileged depending on the identity of other party and whether a third party heard the conversation.
This isn't a criminal investigation anymore. That ended with Lacy's death. I haven't even heard of any civil action outside of Lacy's insurance getting involved. I'm sure there will be civil suits filed at some point though.
This is now a case in the court of public opinion, and that's the only space it exists in right now.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:47 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:maybe not but we dont know her driving record and was most likely gonna cause wreck again or eventually by the way she was driving. Good point you bring up though. But beings this happened i can easily say nothing should have happened tbw also. If she was paying attention and following with distance, this doesnt happen either. Your points are all valid tho. I agree.
KL wasn’t on the road that day, does anything she did that day result in this accident?
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:48 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
called attorney in 10 minutes
Who was his stepfather at one time... attorney is his brother's dad. They spoke all the time.
Let John Allen come forward and make a statement about what they talked about
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:48 pm to USAFTiger42
quote:Oh, FFS ... that's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
If Step 1 caused the accident then why wasn't his vehicle damaged. Have a good day.
Y'all need to stop play-acting as lawyer, judge, and/or jury.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:49 pm to RB10
quote:
Defense attorney continues to muddy waters in defense of client.
An attorney that believes he has a solid case litigates it in court
An attorney that believes he has a weak case litigates it in the court of public opinion.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:50 pm to RB10
quote:I don't know if anyone has filed suit yet, but this will wind up in court with so many involved. Courts aren't perfect, but thank God none of the omniscient would-be advocates from this thread will be there to frick it up further.
This is now a case in the court of public opinion, and that's the only space it exists in right now.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:51 pm to Ice Cold
I'm trying to say I don't see your reasoning
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:53 pm to Ice Cold
quote:
I don't know if anyone has filed suit yet, but this will wind up in court with so many involved. Courts aren't perfect, but thank God none of the omniscient would-be advocates from this thread will be there to frick it up further.
This place is chock full of people who want nothing more than the former LSU player to be absolved of all wrongdoing and sprinkled in are a few that want to believe he was railroaded by "The man".
It's really a sad state of affairs.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:54 pm to USAFTiger42
quote:It's not reasoning, it's literally the law. A party does not need to sustain damages to be found at fault for another party's damages. That is, the lack of damage to Lacy's car does not mean he had no fault.
I'm trying to say I don't see your reasoning
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News