- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:11 pm to TigersJump
quote:
On the day of the accident, Mr. Lacy was driving on a road with two lanes in each direction. While he briefly passed other vehicles, he safely reentered his lane without incident.
This seems like lawyer speak. Highway 20 does have 2 lanes in each direction, but that's when it's closer to town. Near Perez Lane where the LSP release said the accident was is a 2 lane highway with double yellows. After you pass Perez it becomes a passing zone for southbound traffic so his lawyer may be able to start there and put enough doubt into the situation that Lacy was passing safely
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:50 pm to TigersJump
quote:Absolutely bullshite lie. It’s clearly a two lane road with one lane in each direction. frick defense lawyers.
Mr. Lacy was driving on a road with two lanes in each direction
Posted on 2/3/25 at 12:41 am to LCTFAN
quote:
His statement refers to hit and run, Lacy never hit anyone and this possibly does not apply
The law does not require that you hit anyone. If you are the cause of the crash then the law still applies whether your vehicle struck anything or not. The only question is whether or not Lacy caused the crash. If he did, it is a hit and run.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 1:25 am to cbree88
quote:
The two drivers who swerved would not have immediately blamed the charger in this scenario. It’s pretty obvious that Kyren is guilty, unfortunately.
His attorney could argue if it was just one car that went into traffic. But two cars bailing out of the same lane because of him entering a no pass zone and both saying he was the cause? Yea he’s screwed.
This is just lawyer talk to the media to justify his job. Nothing more. Remember the draft is right around the corner.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 1:26 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 1:29 am to TigersJump
Not Guilty yanor!
Posted on 2/3/25 at 1:52 am to TigersJump
quote:
While he briefly passed other vehicles, he safely reentered his lane without incident.
Conveniently omitting that he was allegedly breaking the law by passing in a no-pass zone.
quote:
The accident occurred directly in front of him when a second vehicle in the oncoming lane crossed the centerline and collided with Mr. Herman’s vehicle, in which he was a passenger. We are of information and belief that the vehicle that collided with Mr. Herman’s vehicle was issued a citation. At no time did Mr. Lacy’s vehicle strike the rear of Mr. Herman’s vehicle, nor did any of the vehicles Mr. Lacy passed collide with his.
The vehicles he passed in his own lane were not the issue. It was the head on traffic Lacy was barreling towards that had to swerve to avoid him
I can't even imagine taking the time to write this nonsense.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 1:53 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:47 am to RobbBobb
quote:
As Lacy was illegally passing the other vehicles
This will be his undoing. No one dies if you stay within the double yellows.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:04 am to mtntiger
quote:
why did one vehicle end up swerving off the road to the right and the other swerve left, which ended up hitting the vehicle the victim was in? Why did both drivers say they had to take evasive action to avoid the Dodge Charger?
because he was still behind the driver who was killed, but was in the process of trying to go around the victim, with oncoming traffic too close to complete the pass. Therefore, the oncoming traffic scrambled going right and left, and one hit the victims automobile. Lacy had not fully passed the victim's car yet. That seems plausible.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:09 am to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
What the frick are you talking about? Show me the law that says a normal citizen must stop and render aid at a traffic crash.
If he in fact caused the crash, then yes, it is a crime. He wouldn't be an innocent bystander. I'm sure the drivers of the oncoming traffic were just making things up because of Lacy's skin color.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:17 am to Hold That Tiger 10
Series finale of Seinfeld.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:26 am to Beessnax
How did e pass the car and make the other car hit a car head on in front of him. And he had to pass the wreck? Makes no sense
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:26 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
If he in fact caused the crash, then yes,
Unless there’s video evidence, it can’t be proven he caused the crash lol
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:35 am to sunnydaze
quote:
Unless there’s video evidence, it can’t be proven he caused the crash lol
yeah....you know, except for the two eye witness accounts that they had to swerve to miss his car, and one hit another car head on in their attempt to swerve out of the way of Lacy's car.
But yeah, you seem legit and not at all trying to defend the black man.
At this point, you should probably be banned. You aren't even trying to hide it anymore, unless you are trolling. Either way, probably need to take a little time away. It is the same with every message from you.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:36 am to Mandtgr47
Everything you post towards me is about race lol but I’m the one need to be banned
You are very weird my man
You are a clown for sure
You are very weird my man
You are a clown for sure
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 5:39 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:36 am to HattiesburgTiger5439
quote:
How did e pass the car and make the other car hit a car head on in front of him. And he had to pass the wreck? Makes no sense
my guess is that he was ATTEMPTING to make the pass, but the oncoming traffic was too close, resulting in what happened.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:03 am to Roux22
quote:
Wanna bet? With who his attorney is and how he is viewed in that area combined with the city attorney and their relationship I am at the point of betting he walks away free.
Matt Ory has become a good defense attorney. Last year he got 2 people arrested for a cold case murder released. They were released before the grand jury filed a no true bill, so the DA’s office had to walk back a weak case.
I think in Terrebonne he has gotten some defendants off without convictions or hung juries.
All it will take is just one juror to cast doubt or feel the implied racism and will vote not guilty to the serious charge resulting in no jail time.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 8:40 am to DCtiger1
quote:
In what world is it a crime to not help after an accident?
Generally if you are a direct witness or involved.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 8:43 am to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Failure to stop and render aid is also a crime which the lawyer just admitted.
No the frick it’s not
Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:58 am to TigersJump
He gone
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News