- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:21 pm to St Augustine
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:21 pm to St Augustine
quote:
What does this have to do with players fighting for a 5th year
Because they want to be able to enforce their rules and policies, which would unfairly restrict the athletes from exercising their 5th year. Is the basic issue
1
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:21 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Nothing is happening, moron Have you ever been to a 10 hour court hearing? I have. The judge decided the case a long time ago. Absolutely by all means remain enthralled by sketchy tidbits of who is on the stand though. I apologize profusely for the discussion
Then just get out of it. Nobody thinks you’re as important as you obviously do.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:22 pm to Indefatigable
Just have a snickers and settle down a little Beavis
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:23 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Have you ever been to a 10 hour court hearing? I have.
We don’t count the paralegals uploading the exhibits.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:23 pm to JayVegas702
The SEC shouldn't be able to enforce a rule they modified after a tro was granted, regardless of which school the player wants to go to. They're trying to make this about LSU when it's about the players. It's maddening
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:24 pm to Indefatigable
Let them play.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:24 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s in total nonsense and everyone involved would be better off walking away.
quote:
Indefatigable
The age of civility died in a whimper a looooooong time ago
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:24 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Changing the rules now doesn't just affect the players in this case. That affects every single player in this conference.
Irony.
quote:
Says this judge doesn't need to solve all of college sports. His job is to decide if going to professional sports ends their ability to participate in collegiate sports.
Bold strategy, Cotton.
Not a good look trying to tell the judge what is and is not his job. (If that is indeed the context in which it was delivered.)
Also, he is attempting to pull the will over everyone’s eyes that this ruling has no influence on the future of college football… He may need to convince future clients that he isn’t responsible for such foolishness by means of insanity.
quote:
Lsu is a voluntary member of this conference and are bound by the rules of the conference.
Be careful what you wish for, SEC. This could very well set the stage for LSU stepping away from the conference after the football season ends.
Slippery slope, when other voluntary member institutions are doing the same as them.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:24 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
Yeah, I don’t understand why the SEC is trying to die on this hill s
Remind me again..
Did they sue Alabama after they brought back a basketball player that had played 3 seasons in the g-league?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:24 pm to Indefatigable
Bro, what’s it like to wake up with zero testosterone? What’s it like to wake up without a spine? Stand up for yourself just once
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:26 pm to jrodslu
Interesting, but now LSU name has actually entered the chat. May have been posted earlier
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:26 pm to jrodslu
quote:
Stand up for yourself just once
Every time he tries to stand up he steps on one of his meat curtains
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:26 pm to Indefatigable
I think you’re the moron for typing all this shite that no one is reading and just giving you a down vote
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:27 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Nothing is happening, moron Have you ever been to a 10 hour court hearing? I have. The judge decided the case a long time ago. Absolutely by all means remain enthralled by sketchy tidbits of who is on the stand though. I apologize profusely for the discussion
Suck my space wiener
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:27 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Indefatigable
Stop derailing the thread.
Put the phone down and watch your high school football game that you went to for some reason.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:27 pm to UnsureTiger
Plaintiff rebuttal
This is not about testing the line. The line is not clear between pro and amateur. If the line is so clear then why can't they explain it?
College baseball and softball teams can play exhibitions against pro players. You allow overseas pros to participate in college. G League players are allowed to participate in college. Other examples are given...
These athletes did not make millions. None of them made any real money. One of them got 20k and some of them received a few hundred dollars.
Judge interrupted and said if they voluntarily left and were ultimately cut they knew that this was a possibility of their actions
Attorney says well it's an argument of old rules vs new rules. Under the old rules players were given red shirts and more years but to make it easier let's look at the new rule.
An individuals eligibility gives them 5 years from enrollment or 5 years from their 19th birthday. All of these players are less than 5 years from their 19th birthday. They made these rules and wrote these rules and under their rules these players should be eligible
No other rebuttal. Matter has been submitted to the judge. He will come back with ruling
This is not about testing the line. The line is not clear between pro and amateur. If the line is so clear then why can't they explain it?
College baseball and softball teams can play exhibitions against pro players. You allow overseas pros to participate in college. G League players are allowed to participate in college. Other examples are given...
These athletes did not make millions. None of them made any real money. One of them got 20k and some of them received a few hundred dollars.
Judge interrupted and said if they voluntarily left and were ultimately cut they knew that this was a possibility of their actions
Attorney says well it's an argument of old rules vs new rules. Under the old rules players were given red shirts and more years but to make it easier let's look at the new rule.
An individuals eligibility gives them 5 years from enrollment or 5 years from their 19th birthday. All of these players are less than 5 years from their 19th birthday. They made these rules and wrote these rules and under their rules these players should be eligible
No other rebuttal. Matter has been submitted to the judge. He will come back with ruling
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:27 pm to JayVegas702
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Those players should have submitted their college applications
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:28 pm to JayVegas702
Oh look, LSU wants to be tagged in.
Just like we kept telling that moron this whole thread.
Just like we kept telling that moron this whole thread.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:28 pm to JayVegas702
That request isn't crazy because the SEC are the ones who split the crowd because the other athletes weren't going to LSU
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:28 pm to jrodslu
This is almost starting to feel like the SEC has some kind of vendetta against Kiffin. Do they feel like he made them look bad the way he left Ole Miss or is it something else.
Page 80 of 100
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News