2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith Tracked Trump's Lawyers' Phone Calls
Posted on 10/5/26 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
Posted on 10/5/26 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
They got info on Suzie Wiles. They weren’t targeting attorneys. But you’d have to first get past the clickbait thread title to understand that.
Normalizing the targeting of a campaign is interesting.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:00 pm to moneyg
Indeed it was to hang over Drumpfs head during the election.
Decatur and the frick SlowtapdancingPro love these tactics.
Decatur and the frick SlowtapdancingPro love these tactics.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:57 pm to Wednesday
quote:
I care about none of this unless he is disbarred and criminally prosecuted
Well, if we go on past precedent for indicting, convicting and incarcerating Bureaucratic State Skunks ol Jackie baw has nothing to worry about.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:58 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What are the things about Jack Smith that you don’t particularly care for?
He used lots of methodologies of the Police State I abhor.
He has a really bad history (none of that behavior seems to overlap with the current cases, but it's still worth criticism)
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
He’s not going to answer that.
Wrong
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:59 pm to moneyg
quote:
…that’s because his endeavor failed and pushing forward was going to expose him further.
No. It's because the DOJ has a policy not to prosecute a sitting President for separation of powers issues.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
What reason would y track attorneys cell data
Posted on 10/5/26 at 2:59 pm to moneyg
quote:
Normalizing the targeting of a campaign is interesting.
We do not hate these people enough.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:00 pm to the808bass
quote:
He doesn’t believe in truth.
Wrong again
quote:
Only in legality.
Wrong yet again.
quote:
. It’s why he sounds crazy to normies.
Their issues with normal discussions of legal issues based on legal standards isn't my issue. All I can do is educate them.
That's a separate discussion from "the truth" however (although there will be overlap), which I have also explained.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:01 pm to moneyg
quote:
SFP is trying to use the DOJ policy to explain away his obvious intent.
No
I'm using DOJ policy to explain a behavior undertaken pursuant to that specific DOJ policy
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:01 pm to Jbird
quote:
What reason would y track attorneys cell data
For a conspiracy case? Do I need to insult you by explaining that?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:03 pm to moneyg
quote:
Normalizing the targeting of a campaign is interesting.
What part about being part of a "campaign" should legally insulate someone from prosecution of alleged illegal behavior?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:03 pm to BoarEd
So they got caught doing it a decade ago.... and they ran right back to the same tactics to do it again. 
And it will keep happening since there are absolutely and completely zero consequences.
And it will keep happening since there are absolutely and completely zero consequences.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
Look at slowassholepro.
You go!
Was that part of the witch hunt?
You go!
Was that part of the witch hunt?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Simple question do you think Jack was appointed to sway an election?
Simple yes or no will suffice.
Simple yes or no will suffice.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:15 pm to Jbird
quote:
do you think Jack was appointed to sway an election?
No.
If direct, credible evidence is shown that disputes that, I may change my mind.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
I am not surprised.
Like peachmints
Like peachmints
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
So why’d he give up once an election happened, having evidence? Again the whole premise of his appointment is political which you have said it isn’t.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What part about being part of a "campaign" should legally insulate someone from prosecution of alleged illegal behavior?
Don't play stupid on who the actual targets were. Just don't. Just this one time.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:23 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Don't play stupid on who the actual targets were. Just don't. Just this one time.
Targets: Donald J. Trump, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Olivera
#NeverForget
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News