0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:04 am to BoarEd
Total scum. That is all.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:06 am to Strannix
quote:
The FBI is a criminal organization
There is another criminal organization that says, "Hello"!
quote:
hen-Special Counsel Jack Smith's team secretly met at the CIA in late 2023 with former Director John Brennan to discuss "expert testimony" in the classified documents prosecution of President Donald Trump, and the FBI agents who attended the interview left blank their notes of what transpired, according to bombshell memos released Monday.
The autumn 2023 interaction with Smith's team occurred just months after Brennan testified before the House Judiciary Committee about the now-discredited Russia collusion case. Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, alleged in an October 2025 criminal referral to the Justice Department that Brennan's testimony was false.
FBI Did Not Take Notes When Jack Smith Met With CIA Chief Brennan!!
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 10:12 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:08 am to BoarEd
Made me sick to my stomach watching video (reddit over weekend) of Jack Smith at a public event, being treated like a national hero by other leftists. All of this, from the party who used to hate government overreach, invasion of privacy, etc.
How we have fallen.
How we have fallen.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:08 am to Timeoday
quote:
Special Counsel Jack Smith's team secretly met at the CIA in late 2023 with former Director John Brennan to discuss "expert testimony" in the classified documents prosecution of President Donald Trump, and the FBI agents who attended the interview left blank their notes of what transpired, according to bombshell memos released Monday.
Not a good look for anyone involved. shite like this tends to make people think that, oh, I don’t know…maybe they have something to hide?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:15 am to Wednesday
quote:
care about none of this unless he is disbarred and criminally prosecuted
This is my opinion. NOT that I don't think Smith should be prosecuted.
New management has controlled the DOJ for 19 months. If there is evidence of criminality, what's the holdup on prosecution of Smith?
Is this just political talk to fire up the base? Free beer tomorrow?
I STILL don't understand why Liz Cheney hasn't been prosecuted for the witness tampering she admitted during her bogus J6 shenanigans.
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:21 am to Wednesday
quote:
unless he is disbarred
Smith is licensed only by New York. Most bar associations (even in red states) are notoriously liberal.
ZERO chance that New York disbars anyone for ANYTHING done to Trump.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:22 am to IvoryBillMatt
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
- Allegedly tracked nearly two dozen defense attorneys, five journalists, @FLOTUS, political advisers including @FBIDirectorKash
- Administration official characterizes as "intrusive tactics" by special counsel Jack Smith team
- Probe laid groundwork for classified records case against President Trump
Pen Register Trap and Trace or PRTT
- Surveillance tool collects non-content routing data
- Phone numbers dialed or received
- Call times and duration
Two Scenarios
- Used for criminal and national security investigations
- lower standard than probable-cause warrant
Potential Violations
- First (Freedom of Speech) and Fourth Amendments (unreasonable search and seizure)
NOTE: Former Senior FBI agent says it looks like a classic FBI "tickle the wire" operation.
After FBI agents contact Wiles, the bureau tracks phone calls to identify who she immediately contacts
"On 10 April 2023, FBI WFO (Washington Field Office) reviewed WILES's telephonic activity to determine contacts of interest on the date of her FBI interview."
Declassified records via @WhiteHouse
transparency task force
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:24 am to BoarEd
quote:
Trump Probe: Approval Came From The TOP
- FBI, Biden DOJ Leadership
- Then FBI Director Wray Initials memo, Deputy AG Lisa Monaco initials, with note to then Attorney General Garland:
"Merrick, I recommend you approve, Lisa 3/25/22"
While memo is heavily redacted, it reads in part:
"Although members of the 45th Presidential
administration are no longer in office, the DOJ Memo states that the scope of this policy should be broadly construed to ensure that Department leadership is made aware of the opening of matters that could potentially be disruptive to the democratic process if publicly disclosed prior
to an election...."
Declassified via @WhiteHouse transparency task force
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:38 am to BoarEd
BoarEd, that appears to be evidence of criminality. Why do you think they are releasing that evidence without any visible prosecution?
For how long has the Trump DOJ sat on that evidence?
For how long has the Trump DOJ sat on that evidence?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:41 am to IvoryBillMatt
So why did they dismiss it without prejudice with all the “evidence”
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:41 am to BoarEd
quote:
I'm sure SFP will be along shortly to tell us that he is shocked and flabbergasted by this behavior and that he was wrong about Jack Smith before and Smith should be prosecuted. Right?
As soon as you can discuss this issue:
quote:
FBI field agents wrote that they did NOT believe there was probable cause for the Mar-a-Lago raid, but DOJ pushed ahead anyway ??
as to how it relates to the story AND how it was handled during litigation.
quote:
and Smith should be prosecuted.
What law did he break based on this reveal?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:42 am to DeBoar
quote:
So why did they dismiss it without prejudice with all the “evidence”
Because Trump was elected and it's DOJ policy.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Ignore the without prejudice part.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Backdooring his spying on the president should give all concern.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:44 am to BoarEd
quote:
I'm sure SFP will be along shortly to tell us that he is shocked and flabbergasted by this behavior and that he was wrong about Jack Smith before and Smith should be prosecuted. Right?
Thanks. I don't feel well today and needed the laugh.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:44 am to BoarEd
All of these types of activities will fit quite nicely in the Grand Conspiracy case(s).
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:45 am to AUstar
quote:
How was he able to get a warrant for the lawyers?
Is a warrant even needeed?
quote:
In Smith v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court held that installation and use of a pen register by a telephone company does not constitute a “search” within the context of the Fourth Amendment. The Court distinguished pen registers from listening devices because pen registers “do not acquire the contents of communications.” Therefore, the telephone numbers obtained through the pen register were properly introduced as evidence in this case even though the pen register was installed without a search warrant.
Also, you can ask Michael Cohen about how what you said is not an absolute standard.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:45 am to DeBoar
quote:
Aka all lawyers are scumbags
Except for Wednesday of course.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:45 am to themunch
quote:
Backdooring his spying on the president should give all concern.
Bingo. All the “evidence” is illegal bullshite gathered to prosecute if they would’ve won. They know it isn’t legal aka dismissed without prejudice.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News