re: Its time: is Daniels better than burrow?

Dead heat, 1a and 1b in whatever order you prefer.

I don't know but the question isn't much different than who's the best qb on the planet cause both are easily top 5.

Only in your stupid world

quote:

---

so is burrow. always was

---

I didn’t says burrow wasn’t. ??? I was pointing out all of Daniel’s pros and why it is making him successful in the NFL. It’s the combination of that passing and run threat potentially being better than anything we have seen that could lift Daniels over Burrow at the NFL level. Again Burrow is my favorite qb of all time and Daniels still has to keep improving. But the possibility is definitely there.

So if the surrounding cast doesn’t matter why didn’t Daniels win the Natty ?

Your argument has no substance dummy

The argument that Daniels does not have a D is not a good one. Washington ranks 13th in NFL (4th in NFC) in Defense. Where as Bengals rank 25th in NFL (14th in AFC).

Burrow had to have the season he had to even have a shot to make the playoffs. If his Defense was similar to Daniels D ( getting turnovers at key spots), the Bengals would be in the Championship Game too and hosting.

The main question is Daniels better than Burrow? At this point he is not better than Burrow. He is doing phenomenal things no rookie should do. It is one year. Burrow has been elite for 5 years.

quote:

---

No.

---

So Washington doesnt have a better O-line, running game, and defense than Cincinnati?

The Bengals allowed more yards, touchdowns, and of course points.

The Redskins outrushed the Bengals by over a 1000 yds this year (and still outrushed them if you take away Daniels 800 plus yards)

Rating offensive lines is more subjective, and sacks were close to even (Washington allowed two more)

quote:

---

The argument can be made.

---

But you aren't making an argument... you just asked a question.

quote:

---

So Washington doesnt have a better O-line, running game, and defense than Cincinnati?

---

That was not what I responded to. I'll post it to remind you:

quote:

---

significantly better oline, running game, and defense.

---

(emphasis added)

quote:

---

The Redskins outrushed the Bengals by over a 1000 yds this year (and still outrushed them if you take away Daniels 800 plus yards)

---

526 rushing attempts (5th most) v. 380 rushing attempts (3rd fewest)

If you take out JD's stats, the ypc gets closer (4.5 to 4.1) and that's ignoring the impact JD had in creating the rushing game for the RBs.

Slightly better, but not significantly better. Same with the Ds.

Their OLs are rated very similarly, as is their D. This ignores the huge advantage Burrow has at WR and ST.

People are creating this narrative that JD had these huge advantages and Burrow is playing with a sisters of the poor team, but it's fantasy. Just like how it's even worse fantasy to pretend the team Burrow led to the Super Bowl was bad (it's more talented than either of these rosters this year).